General Panda 4x4

Currently reading:
General Panda 4x4

The twin air is great in your 50mph scenario. There's plenty of grunt, 4th or 5th would be fine.
Take both motors out for a drive and see. The twin air is much more fun and a fair bit quicker.
Mpg wise, the multijet would be my choice. fun and performance = TA.

I've can get 70 mph in 4th gear so it has got grunt and if you drop the speed below 60 mph you can get Good MPG out of the TA engine
 
The twin air is great in your 50mph scenario. There's plenty of grunt, 4th or 5th would be fine.
Take both motors out for a drive and see. The twin air is much more fun and a fair bit quicker.
Mpg wise, the multijet would be my choice. fun and performance = TA.

In my case I've just changed from an Alfa Mito 95HP Multijet to the Panda
Trekking TwinAir, and the performance of both seems quite similar- the
Panda's lighter weight making up for the 10HP power deficiency :)

Driving the Panda TA on the gearchange indicators is strangely diesel-like
as one's encouraged to stay around the peak torque revs- and I'm now
averaging about 55MPG (having covered just over 1000 miles to date)

The only time I've used more than 3000rpm is for overtaking, when the
acceleration is very satisfying (with motorcycle-style noise :D )

IMHO you'd need to cover a rather high mileage to justify going for the
Multijet, and I speak as a former diesel devotee!

I think the TwinAir really is a game-changer :cool:



Chris
 
Interesting. Will follow their thoughts on it. If I take the plunge on one still swithering between the engines.

Do you go for the economy of the diesel and lose 6th gear

Or

Do you go for the performance of the TA knowing that petrol is nearly 10p a litre cheaper than diesel so it doesn't have to be as economical.

Ultimately any car I buy needs reasonable 50mph pick up for safe Rural overtaking. The TA I took a test drive in 'felt' like it had the shove as long as you knew the gearing (torque band narrower than a TD), but I wasn't actually overtaking anything to know for sure and may well have just been revelling in the noise!

Happy to hear the thoughts of you early adopters!!

Hi 4x4Fun,

I think you'll be absolutely fine overtaking at 50mph whether you choose the TA or diesel.

I live in a similar sounding area where there are lots of rural roads and not many opportunities to overtake. We have the 1.2 regular Panda which is less powerful of course, but I never have any trouble overtaking quickly at 50mph in third or fourth gear. Sure it doesn't sound particularly refined (lol!), but as long as the rev counter is around 3500 or above it won't let you down. The power is there, you've just got to know how to use it;)

I can well imagine it will feel odd moving from a 2.0TD as you have got plenty of torque on tap whenever you need it. But I would be very surprised if either engine was insufficient for your needs once you got used to them.

Put it this way, if I can do it in my puny little car then you will have no problem!:D
 
Last edited:
I had the opportunity to try the split personality of the T/A motor over the last week:

Exiting narrow side roads feeding into busy country A and B roads where the traffic is doing c.60mph (or 80mph, in the case of the A303): The car accelerates up to speed very decisively; this manoeuvre now feels 'safe' in a way that the old Mk3 never did. Living in the countryside, this ability to get up to speed quickly is very important and the Panda T/A does not disappoint.

Up until now I've been holding off a bit and just been tickling the throttle on station and school runs, so it was nice to experience some of the zip that I noted from my test drive way back at the start of January.

:)
 
The only possible benefit from the beam axle is it's articulation - would those three-wheeled stunts they show so much on the new model be possible on the old one?
 
I think though that FIAT have done a rather good job of making the Mk4 4x4 actually drive very well on full-winters even in the summer. I agree you get a bit more squirm and perhaps other traits, but it is just so well resolved through the Panda's helm that any lack of grip compared to all-season or summer tyres is just not an issue. The more i drive the little car, the more I realise just how damn good it is; I mean, by which yard-stick would anyone expect a city-car based 4x4 to handle so well? FIAT clearly decided that the rule-book needed re-writing...

Another thing I am re-appreciating after my months of Panda-absence is just how handy it is to have a narrow and short car for parking at the station and in town.

Becoming addicted...:D
 
I think though that FIAT have done a rather good job of making the Mk4 4x4 actually drive very well on full-winters even in the summer. I agree you get a bit more squirm and perhaps other traits, but it is just so well resolved through the Panda's helm that any lack of grip compared to all-season or summer tyres is just not an issue. The more i drive the little car, the more I realise just how damn good it is; I mean, by which yard-stick would anyone expect a city-car based 4x4 to handle so well? FIAT clearly decided that the rule-book needed re-writing...

Another thing I am re-appreciating after my months of Panda-absence is just how handy it is to have a narrow and short car for parking at the station and in town.

Becoming addicted...:D

In truth, a small 4x4 with added ride height is the PERFECT city car.

Want to pull out into a small gap from a junction? 4x4 helps immensely, I've got a mk3 4x4 and it's fantastic for this.

It's higher than most other cars other than proper 4x4's which is fantastic

It's got good ground clearance and doesn't have massive wheels so you can drive it up kerbs without worrying about trashing your wheels, perhaps more of a worry with the Mk4 and its 15" wheels.

One beef I have with my mk3 4x4 and the way it drives is the horrid way in which it self centres the steering, it feels so rubbery compared to our 500..... They've used the same suspension arms and strut top mounts in the mk3 4x4 as they did in the 2wd Panda so unless they've changed something on the subframe, the castor could have been adversely affected. That and the lack of a proper LSD in the rear are the only things I have against my 4x4.

Most people won't care about those things so I'm sure that the Mk4 4x4 is a cracker and probably one of the best city cars.

Maybe in a few years time I'll have a Mk4 4x4 as well :)
 
Because of the hot whether I've had the Air-Con on High and I notice that the fan speed goes faster when the engine revs faster also fan slows down ,I notice this On fan speed 3 or 4 ,I have manual air-con ,I wonder if this is built in so it works this Way

I noted the same thing the other day- on my next drive I'll hook up my
multimeter to see if it's related to the alternator voltage.

If it isn't, it's probably beyond my reasoning powers :confused:



Chris
 
Back
Top