we are not going to agree on this, the mk2 is much improved on the mk1 and only time will tell if more mk2 forum members report as many faults as the mk1 members.
Umberto
There lieth the problem, no we are not going to agree, but the Mk2 is
not much improved on the mk1. The major differences are cosmetic, the fundamental parts of the car that are known to be problematic are exactly the same, just look on
eper.
It is that part of your statement that I disagree with. You are wrong to say that most faults with the mk1 are resolved in the mk2 if you can not back that up with hard facts.
Is it unreasonable to suggest that if more problems arise with older cars it is quite possibly for no other reason than the simple fact that they are older? These cars tend to have had more use and in a lot of cases (as is common with older cars) have done more miles? Before you say that newer cars can have higher mileages, yes thay can; but with few exceptions (Taxi's for instance) newer cars with high miles tend to have done them in compressed periods over longer journeys than for instance an older average mileage car that may well have done those miles on stop start shorter journeys, school runs etc that incur greater wear and tear than cruising on a nice smooth motorway or A road for several hours a day.
Please feel free to list exactly which faults have been rectified, bearing in mind that the clutch including slave and master cylinder, front drop links, wishbones, anti roll bar and crank sender which im sure you'll agree cover a lot of the common faults
are the same in both Mk1's and Mk2's.
Until then perhaps you should stay away from saying things like "its fact" until you can prove beyond reasonable doubt that the fact is correct. Anything else is opinion!
Might I also ask why you say(and I quote) "in any case you are assuming that people who buy older multipla's are going to be "hands on" and spend a lot of their spare time replacing all the bits & pieces"?
I assume nor imply anything of the sort!
Please, other Mk2 owners do not take offence in anything I have written above, the post was simply a response to innaccuracies in one members post and not any sort of attack on the Mk2 which i happen to think is a great (if a little bland looking

) car!