too bad..still when i went into a showroom a year ago looking at alternatives to the panda we did buy, the salesman actually though the cityrover was a better car...panel gaps and squeaky dash included..walked away very quickly
all the big manufacturers have had there troubles, vw, fiat, renault, etc the difference is can you still make a product that people "want" and you look at most of the mainland european makers and the answer is yes they can, the panda came along when fiat looked like it was in serious trouble, so why not rover? poor management, no imagination, and a process of gradual evolution rather than innovation, which apparently they were renowned for back in the day.
i do feel the workers there and in the support industries are bearing the brunt, but they like many others are simply reaping what they sowed back in the 70's with wildcat strikes bring production to a virtual standstill for no reason, creating an image of poor quality, "friday/monday cars" and a general air of "we're crap and dont care", that endured for a long long time.
despite problems worse than that for the italian marques (alfa and fiat) and the majority of japanese ones with rampant rust and reliabilty from that same period of time, they have managed to distance thrmselves from that image, with a product range that works and is desirable in the main
at least the mini and land/range rover made it out alive and are thriving, as for the reat of the range...i agree with steve, rubbish