General Case Fiat Punto 1.1 55 sx

[fingers99]

usually anitvirus software will recognize cracks as a virus while in reality its only a false positive, it rly depends where u download your torrents from, if its from a private site there is no chance it contains any malicious sh_it, torrents downloaded from public sites cant always be trusted

You've obviously no idea of how P2P networks and torrents work. Why would something as innocent as a (genuine) crack register as a positive?

 

[flisko]

uploaders at private sites are usually respected members, and not anyone can upload torrents there, as opose to public trackers where anyone can upload their own torrents and put anything in it

still a false positive

 

[fingers99]

But it's easy enough to seed your own torrents (and easier still to transfer files by plain old peer to peer where nothing is checked: just install aMule, eMule, Gnutella, etc.). And check how many torrents on torrent sites are actually verified.

Many of the folk who publish cracks are truly unpleasant folk -- they'd give the Sopranos a bad name. And, although I don't believe in the ownership of software (and for that reason I don't use a closed source OS), it's nasty to use cracks against tiny software publishers like MES.

 

[flisko]

almost no one still uses emule and similar programs

 

[fingers99]

You'd be surprised. One of the servers lists more than 32,000,000 files!

Torrents are certainly easier for the end user, and generally quicker, but the problem is that the sites which host the torrents themselves are both prone to legal action and easy to block by ISPs. Most of the P2P ports are not even monitored.