General Best MPG from 165bhp 2.0 diesel sport

Currently reading:
General Best MPG from 165bhp 2.0 diesel sport

If u read my other post I used half tank on 295 miles to average that

I topped up the quarter with the share of money I got from a friend to cover there part the fuel bill

So is was roughly half tank to do the 67mpg over 295 miles

That's not 67mpg there is no way you got anything near 67mpg over that distance its way more than the official figures.

To have done 67mpg you would have to have only used 20 litres of fuel over 295 miles which is way less than half a tank. The Bravo's fuel tank is 57 litres. Half a tank for 295 miles is about 48mpg.
 
I tested my cars mpg over the weekend.
I had a full tank of fuel, and got 658miles till empty and an average mpg of 65.3

Is that good / bad?

Brim it then do the calculation then you will get an accurate value. I would say 658 out of a tank is pretty impressive, is it the 1.6 diesel?
 
That's not 67mpg there is no way you got anything near 67mpg over that distance its way more than the official figures.

To have done 67mpg you would have to have only used 20 litres of fuel over 295 miles which is way less than half a tank. The Bravo's fuel tank is 57 litres. Half a tank for 295 miles is about 48mpg.

I have never managed to fit more than 50l in my tank
 
it's funny i get WAY better milage at 90 (on a closed road) than i do at 70, like 10mpg more must be the gearing :confused:
 
That's not 67mpg there is no way you got anything near 67mpg over that distance its way more than the official figures.

To have done 67mpg you would have to have only used 20 litres of fuel over 295 miles which is way less than half a tank. The Bravo's fuel tank is 57 litres. Half a tank for 295 miles is about 48mpg.

I get about 330 from half a tank and nowhere near 67, or even 60 mpg on my computer. I average 50mpg on mine, the most I've ever had is 53mpg, and that's working it brim to brim, not using the computer which is quite inaccurate.
 
Back
Top