Hi! No, it's still the basic 60HP engine. Classic 1.2 8V but it has new design rocker cover, with rotary oil cap (not like on that Panda you linked) and a 2-3 mm wider cam belt. As i said, this engine has no mark on the cylinder head so no idea where exactly should i set the cam belt. I do have experience in changing belts, i've done a few cars, including my own Punto a few years ago which had the same 1.2 8V engine but that was pre-face. And that engine had the mark on the head, so it was easy to align the belt. This one does not. Very strange.
I'm asking this, because someone changed the belt on this car earlier, before my girlfriend purchased it, and the car runs OK at idle, no strange noises, no vibration, however i feel it a little bit weak, not very good at accelerating. I know it's not a race car, but mine old Punto with it's 60HP ran better. So i was thinking, the cam belt is maybe 1 tooth off...
I could not find a guide for this exact type of engine...
Hello Forgonati and welcome.
I've messed about quite a bit with these engines in the Panda range (owned a few from a '99 Panda Parade to our current 2010 1.2 dynamic eco) so basically exactly the same engine. As you tell us it has the round oil filler cap we'll not bother talking about the earlier versions (which as you say have the square rubber filler cap and, on the early ones, a thinner belt with courser tooth pitch) So the engines with the round filler caps are what they call EVO 2 engines. Here are a couple of forum threads which are relevant:
Andy Monty's definitive version:
https://www.fiatforum.com/grande-punto-guides/237966-1-2-8v-evo-2-engine-cam-belt-replacement.html
and my own humble offering:
https://www.fiatforum.com/panda/459903-beckys-timing-belt-ongoing-saga.html
All 60 HP engines have a solid cam pulley/sprocket like the one shown in the pictures you have posted and these engines were produced until sometime in 2011 (maybe early 2012) they were then superseded by the 69 HP engine which has a Variable timing cam pulley which you can see in the "add on" Andy has included in his feature. The 69 HP engine was used in some of the very last of the 169 model run and got a reputation for not being as good a "driver" as the 60 HP. However we can forget about the VVT engine because yours is too early and obviously has a solid cast cam sprocket.
Earlier engines were, as you have found out, easily timed by lining up the timing marks - the crankshaft has them on the flywheel and the bottom belt sprocket (the mark on the sprocket is lined up with a mark on the oil pump casing) and the camshaft sprocket mark is lined up with the mark which is shown on the head in your biggest picture. At some point in the engine's life, and I think all evo2 engines are like this, they started producing them with a "free fitting" camshaft sprocket. These sprockets do not have a locating dowel/key like the earlier engines and NO TIMING MARK ON THEIR HEAD. I believe your engine is one of these (more on it in a minute) - Mine is a 2010 60 HP engine and is like this. Another pointer is that if you look at the larger picture of the sprocket you found and posted you can see a drilled hole in the face near the bolt this is the hole the dowel in the cam locates into. I've magnified the wee picture of your actual sprocket (upper left in your post) and there's no hole is there? Something else I've noticed on the ones I've worked on is that the Sprockets with the dowel/key are held onto the cam with a hex headed bolt (as in your big picture) whereas the "free" pulleys are held by a big Torx bolt. I think the edge of the bolt in you upper left picture - and I can only just see the edge of it - looks more like a Torx than a hex head?
So my guess, and that's all it can be without actually seeing the car, is that you've got a "free" sprocket here. Now the problem here is that the sprocket, having no dowel/key, can theoretically, be tightened in any position relative to the camshaft. Because once that securing bolt/Torx is slackened the sprocket is free to spin on the end of the camshaft - It drives simply because the bolt/torx is done up so tight that it locks the sprocket to the cam by friction, no dowel, no taper, no splines, just a very very tight bolt (and people have reported problems with slackening and retightening them because of this! So, if you've read Andy's (excellent) guide, you'll understand that the only way you are really going to be able to be sure the timing is "right" is to set it up with the proper timing tools - there are no reference timing marks - and, because you didn't do the last belt on it, you have no idea whether the person who did it actually set it up right?
Alright all you other knowledgeable "clever clogs" on here, please chime in now and tell me what I've missed or advised wrongly here?
PS sorry for the "welcome" bit at the beginning. Not that you're not welcome, indeed you are! I just got you mixed up with someone else I was "chatting" to.