Technical 1.9 M Jet to tune on not to tune

Currently reading:
Technical 1.9 M Jet to tune on not to tune

Ooh, drove a 182 and was very impressed with how good it was, not just pace and handling but even the ride.

With petrol I find you need at least a 2.0litre (for displacement) or, less preferably a turbo/supercharger for real torque. Can't stand these revvy v-tech style engines which need 6k+ revs to work :p Best engine I've had in a car was my Alfa 2.0 twinspark in a 145 cloverleaf, handling was fairly crap though :D
 
Ooh, drove a 182 and was very impressed with how good it was, not just pace and handling but even the ride.

With petrol I find you need at least a 2.0litre (for displacement) or, less preferably a turbo/supercharger for real torque. Can't stand these revvy v-tech style engines which need 6k+ revs to work :p Best engine I've had in a car was my Alfa 2.0 twinspark in a 145 cloverleaf, handling was fairly crap though :D

Whats wrong with a nice revvy engine? I don't have to cry all day long about my boost pressure and it 'not running right'. etc etc. I love my VTEC engine.
Although I'd like a turbo next for tuneability.
 
One of you is talking about straight line here and the other is talking about what would be what in corners :p ST pwns in corners but remapped Mjet in straight lines. Even i can do ST's in a straight line.

Yeah i agree, ST trying to draft me to overtake haha .. mm's away from my rear bumber then pulling out next to me then falling back, Focus ST is a challenge
 
Whats wrong with a nice revvy engine? I don't have to cry all day long about my boost pressure and it 'not running right'. etc etc. I love my VTEC engine.
Although I'd like a turbo next for tuneability.

Turbo VTEC, Crazy !! So what Honda do you have ??
 
:Offtopic:

Sorry,couldn't resist...:p
 

Attachments

  • vtec_motiv.jpg
    vtec_motiv.jpg
    77.7 KB · Views: 122
  • vteck.jpg
    vteck.jpg
    63.9 KB · Views: 68
Back
Top