Could you point out where that says the Mk.3 is simply an update of the Mk.2- I'm fairly confident that whilst they might look very similar (well, not <that> similar) they are in fact "properly" different cars.
Cost I would imagine, and it does need good working over or replacement, most, if not all the large manufacturers base engines are newer, cleaner, more economical, better performing for their size etc.Why all this propaganda for a Swift?
I'm a bit surprised that some people want an improved 1.2. Why? If you don't like the 1.2, then buy a TwinAir!
It says:Could you point out where that says the Mk.3 is simply an update of the Mk.2- I'm fairly confident that whilst they might look very similar (well, not <that> similar) they are in fact "properly" different cars.
what we are saying, alex, is that the Fiat 500 has very outdated technology for a car still being sold new in 2015 = )This all seems quite a silly discussion to me - you have to decide what the 500 competes with. Someone decided it was the Swift, which is funny as there are so many other cars in that segment (Polo, Fit/Jazz, Yaris). FIAT has the Punto...
The closer competition is the Suzuki Splash, Toyota iQ, and VW Up, but who really cares - you could buy a 2001 7-series and pretend to be Jason Stratham (The Transporter) for the same price as a 500 - more solid, faster, etc. etc. point I'm making is that no-one is forced to stick to this type of car.
I personally think the 500 is a modern-day 126 - it has the fun character of having been produced cheaply in Poland and will probably carry on for a long time. When the 126 first saw the light of day, it was considered completely uncompetitive, yet the design soldiered on for more than 20 years. I'm not sure whether the 126 had any competitors - they probably all came and went in that time.
-Alex
and pay 2000 GBP more? Not all of us are millionaires! Fiat can easily 'improve' on their base model without increasing the price!Why all this propaganda for a Swift?
I'm a bit surprised that some people want an improved 1.2. Why? If you don't like the 1.2, then buy a TwinAir!
what we are saying, alex, is that the Fiat 500 has very outdated technology for a car still being sold new in 2015 = )
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. If they can get this glitch sorted, then there will be absolutely nothing wrong with the 500
Would you buy a fiat 500 new in 2015? I most certainly wouldn't it's the same car I bought in 2010!
I'm a bit surprised that some people want an improved 1.2. Why? If you don't like the 1.2, then buy a TwinAir!
In 2014 both a 500 Lounge 1.2 and a 500 Lounge TwinAir 80 costed €16695 in my country. Price difference ZERO! In 2015 the 500 Lounge 1.2 became €200 cheaper and the 500 Lounge TwinAir 80 became €600 more expensive, all due to changed taxes. So the difference is €800 now.and pay 2000 GBP more? Not all of us are millionaires!
I totally agree!For every reason other than looks, you'd buy a Panda 99 times out of 100. There is no valid reason for buying a 500 when you see how much cheaper a Panda is. But that is the reality of the market.
In 2010 you couldn't choose a 500S, a 105 hp TwinAir engine, nice 16" Cult wheels, a TFT dashboard, ......Would you buy a fiat 500 new in 2015? I most certainly wouldn't it's the same car I bought in 2010!
In 2010 you couldn't choose a 500S, a 105 hp TwinAir engine, nice 16" Cult wheels, a TFT dashboard, ......