Technical Tappet adjustment? Naah, they adjust automatically.

Currently reading:
Technical Tappet adjustment? Naah, they adjust automatically.

RedPeril

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2012
Messages
78
Points
82
Location
Devon UK
I'm going to have the timing belt checked/replaced with my 2009 1.4L 8 valve Grande having done about 60,000 miles since it was last changed (too soon?) and the Fiat service schedule says to replace the spark plugs and adjust the tappets at this interval. Also, I see the auxilliary belt and water pump should be replaced. I'm not experiencing any misfiring but a slight shuddering occasionally takes place when deaccelerating in fourth gear. The total mileage of the car is 94,000.

One garage I contacted said that the tappets are self adjusting. Is this right?

Any advice or experience would be great.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the photos bugsymike, they print up well and thanks for aligning the row description alongside. I'd have been lost without them! I note that the electrode gap on the NGK IKR9F8 plus is not given on the first "page"?
Are you looking at the left of the pen for the engine series you gave me, it shows NGK ZKR7A-10 with a gap of 1.mm (40 thou.)
 
The first that I can recall shimming was a V8 Triumph Stag engine around 1975 that I rebuilt for on of our customers (roughly two Triumph Dolomite engines nailed together ;)) After grinding in all 16 valves, then assembling and measuring , I then went over to the local Triumph Dealer and ferreted through their box of shims to find what I needed micrometer in hand. Apart from the odd one or two over the years the last ones I did were on Iveco Daily with the 2.8 Sofim engine. Plus the Ducato one that went into my boat. Most of the other early 70s onwards ohc engines had some form of rocker with a threaded adjustment Lada 1200, Moskvich, Mazda OHC models, Ford Pinto engines. Going back the other way the big old Jags were shimmed DOHC engines and they used to say if you could hear them tap that was good, when they went quiet it meant they were due for a rebuild.:)
Never touched the Stag engine but always liked the noise they made. Seems to be a thriving support network for these "fragile" engines if you google it. I remember all the cooling problems. One Triumph I do remember was the pretty awful fuel injection system on the TR6/2.5 Our boss wouldn't let us mess with them. He got a specialist in to do them. Still got my special Crow foot locking spanner for the Pinto engines though, somewhere.

I've heard that said about the old Jag XK engines. Did they suffer seat recession then?
 
Never touched the Stag engine but always liked the noise they made. Seems to be a thriving support network for these "fragile" engines if you google it. I remember all the cooling problems. One Triumph I do remember was the pretty awful fuel injection system on the TR6/2.5 Our boss wouldn't let us mess with them. He got a specialist in to do them. Still got my special Crow foot locking spanner for the Pinto engines though, somewhere.

I've heard that said about the old Jag XK engines. Did they suffer seat recession then?
Sweet engine when running well and had Stromberg carbs if I recall.
Like many vehicles in those days lack of suitable antifreeze for engines with cast iron blocks and aluminum heads, they were held down with studs and nuts and it was a heck of a job getting the heads off, in the end I made up some short wedges and hammered them in the little space between engine and inner wings forcing the heads up enough so I could get a broken hacksaw blade and a pair of molegrips to saw through the studs, then a hydraulic press to push the studs out taking several tonnes of force. I was fortunate enough to not damage the block doing this and a light skim of the heads was enough to not loose the sealing capacity of the inlet manifold in the Vee between the two banks. Two long timing chains I recall?
I did think the straight six Triumph TR6 PI would have been ideal from new, but so many spoilt them with a V8 Rover lump and an autobox.:(
 
I'm going to have the timing belt checked/replaced with my 2009 1.4L 8 valve Grande having done about 60,000 miles since it was last changed (too soon?) and the Fiat service schedule says to replace the spark plugs and adjust the tappets at this interval. Also, I see the auxilliary belt and water pump should be replaced. I'm not experiencing any misfiring but a slight shuddering occasionally takes place when deaccelerating in fourth gear. The total mileage of the car is 94,000.

One garage I contacted said that the tappets are self adjusting. Is this right?

Any advice or experience would be great.
I was just looking back at the original post in this thread and thought I'd sum up the advice given? As regards when the belt should be renewed, I've seen conflicting advice but the most quoted is 5 years or 70,000 miles, whichever is the sooner. Our cars do quite small annual mileages so I tend to flag up that they need doing as they start into their 5th year and, by the time a good weather day comes along - I work in my driveway - which doesn't interfere with family commitments, I generally get them done before the 5th year (Cars like ours, which do lots of short trips, put more strain on the belt anyway so changing a wee bit early is a good idea). As regards "auxiliaries", like tensioners and water pumps, In other words anything which is part of the belt's drive train, I would always renew at the same time because a failure will affect the belt. I'd also always, unless very recently replaced, put a new fan belt (aux belt) on too as it costs very little and will have to be removed to do the cam belt anyway so the only extra cost is the price of the belt itself. Always fit a new cover gasket on reassembly unless the existing one has been renewed very recently. I suppose you could use silicone sealant all round the old one if a new gasket is not available but all the factors around here seem to have them available off the shelf. By the way, make sure you get a gasket set that includes the 4 wee rubber O rings which seal the oilways between the cam cover and top of the cam journal pedastels - some kits contain just the cover gasket on it's own.

I don't think your's will be a VVT engine? but if it is - My boy's 2012 1.4 8 valve is a VVT so I tend to think of this. But if it is a VVT then Cleaning the filter on the valve (which is near the oil filler on the cam cover) is advised. I haven't actually done this on his yet but both our cars will be due belts soon and I'm going to remove the valve on his and clean it. He's been complaining lately that it seems a bit sluggish on the steep hill out of town - Church brae - and if the VVT isn't working properly this might account for it.

Spark plugs? if your's are recommended for changing at this interval, ie 5 years? - then they are probably long life Platignum/iridium type. I run both our Panda and my boy's Punto on ordinary "copper" plugs, mainly because my factor sells them to me for "silly" money and I change them every two years - never have any problems.

Without experiencing it it's difficult to comment on your "shudder" but I'd take a close look at the torque reaction "dog bone" on the bottom of the engine which is there to resist the engine moving back and forwards on it's mountings due to acceleration or overrun. They are known to wear and the rubber go soft or even separate with age.

As regards the garage which said the tappets are self adjusting. Was this a service reception type person or a greasy mechanic? The "clean handed" reception type might reasonably be expected to not know but a technical type should have known as these engines are very common. You might like to consider whether to let this garage work on the car if it was a "dirty finger nail'd" person you spoke with.

In the "grand scheme" of things, these belts are not too difficult to do but are better tackled by someone who is familiar with them as there are numerous posts on the forum where inexperienced people have tried to do one and got it wrong - being one tooth out is a very commonly reported problem. Also, sometimes, it's necessary to do an ECU reset - called a Phonic Wheel Relearn - after the engine is up and running again. This informs the ECU of the new relationship between the cam and crank position sensor signals due to the new belt. Main dealers seem to always do this as part of the operation but it's not really needed unless the car throws up a DTC (it'll light the check engine light) and, if it's going to do it, it usually does this on the first longer trip (out on the open road) you do after the belt is fitted. Trouble with this is it needs dedicated equipment, like the dealer diagnostic gear or Multiecuscan - which many of us have - but which a general duty small workshop is very unlikely to have.

Well, the sun's come out from behind the dark clouds so I'm going to mow the grass in case it decides to rain later.
 
Hi there Puggit Auld Jock and thanks for your summary.

I'm using a service schedule from "Fiat Workshop" which gives a number of things to do, many of which I missed at 72,000 miles so I'm catching up. I've attached a scan, which shows what I'm following as a guide.

Spark plugs? The Auto Data Manual gives NGK ZKR7A-10, which I will follow. and yes, a new rocker cover gasket.

Tell me what a VVT engine is, please! My engine's code is 350A1.000. Difficult to tell over the phone if the person advising me had dirty finger nails but next time I will ask! I take your point and more than one garage has sounded vague on the subject of tappets. One has included 8 cam followers on the parts list. Is this right?

I have a go at many maintenance jobs but, given that timing and the cam belt is so cemtral to things, I think paying for a trained trade person is probably a good investment for me.

Hope the rain held off for the mowing.
 

Attachments

  • 23-09-01 Fiat Worksop schedule..pdf
    200 KB · Views: 45
Last edited:
Hi there Puggit Auld Jock and thanks for your summary.

I'm using a service schedule from "Fiat Workshop" which gives a number of things to do, many of which I missed at 72,000 miles so I'm catching up. I've attached a scan, which shows what I'm following as a guide.

Spark plugs? The Auto Data Manual gives NGK ZKR7A-10, which I will follow. and yes, a new rocker cover gasket.

Tell me what a VVT engine is, please! My engine's code is 350A1.000. Difficult to tell over the phone if the person advising me had dirty finger nails but next time I will ask! I take your point and more than one garage has sounded vague on the subject of tappets. One has included 8 cam followers on the parts list. Is this right?

I have a go at many maintenance jobs but, given that timing and the cam belt is so cemtral to things, I think paying for a trained trade person is probably a good investment for me.

Hope the rain held off for the mowing.
Hi again. The rain did indeed hold off and I got the grass mowed, a couple of plants moved, My shaped bush got a quick hair cut and all the tubs and hanging basket got a good soaking.

Now sitting with a cup of tea and Mrs J has come up with a cherry scone! Hoping EVRi are about to deliver the bits I need to repair my neighbour's strimmer and browsing through my Haynes Punto Manual while I wait - Haynes publication 5956 - Like all the modern Haynes manuals it's not the be all and end all when it comes to manuals, but it does contain a lot of very handy info and I can recommend getting one - I'm sure a used one off ebay would be fine.

The NGK ZKR7A-10 are the "normal" plugs which I use. They are not long life and I replace them every 2 years and whip them out for a quick gap check after a year. I like to keep my gaps within spec to reduce the load on the coils if the gaps get wide. Actually I think they'd probably go on for longer but they're not a lot of money so I do them biannually. I believe the NGK long life plugs are ZKR7A1-8 But I've never felt the need to go for them as the standard jobbies do just fine for me. (and the long life ones are considerably more pricey) By the way, it's not now advised to use a grease on modern plugs any more - typically I'd have used copper grease to reduce the tendency for the plugs to seize/corrode to the head. Modern plugs have a plated finish on the threads, which looks a bit like chrome or nickel but is actually "trivalent" (whatever that is) and is designed to reduce the tendency to seize and, should the threads seize, it's designed to shear away thus releasing the plug. I believe there is an operational advantage too in that the electric current flows more easily without the copa slip thus encouraging a "better" spark. I've been fitting plugs without greasing them for about two, maybe three, years now without any problems and my tin of grease gets used for other stuff.

My Haynes manual shows the 350A1.000 engine as being the single cam 8 valve fitted from 2006 onwards and lists it as a VVT. So, Ok, what's a VVT engine? Variable Valve Technology is what it stands for by the way and what this involves is a camshaft sprocket which is not solidly locked to the camshaft itself! On older engines the camshaft sprocket was a solid component with a key way which lined up with a key way cut in the camshaft and something like a woodruff key (piece of metal) fitting in the slots so locking them together. With a VVT pulley there is no keyway so if you slacken the big bolt/nut holding the pulley onto the end of the camshaft then the pulley can spin freely on the camshaft - and you've just lost the timing! To set it all up again you need a set of cam and crankshaft locking tools (available on the likes of ebay for around 30 to 40 quid.) A non VVT engine will not have that solenoid but often has a cam position sensor on the front end of the cam cover which might be confused for the solenoid if you don't know what you're looking at. My boy's Punto, with VVT, has it's cam sensor on the back end (above the bell housing) of the cam cover.

So what's the big deal with this VVT pulley? Well, the central boss, which the big bolt locks to the camshaft, is free to move (over a limited range of degrees) relative to the toothed outer segment of the pulley assembly. In other words the pulley is actually two parts. Between the inner and outer parts of the pulley there are chambers into which oil from the engine oil supply, can be introduced which either advances or retards the camshaft position in relation to the outer toothed segment of the pulley. Strewth, complicated eh? So why do this? Well, it's complicated, but at it's simplest what's going on is that at low engine speeds springs in the pulley keep the cam in it's retarded position so the cam timing is "mild" and the engine behaves in a docile fashion. As the revs rise the ECU will command the solenoid valve in the cam cover to open (it's just to the left of the oil filler cap. Looks like a wee barrel shaped thing sitting at right angles to the axis of the camshaft on the cam cover with an electric wire going into it) at low revs it shuts off the oil supply to the pulley which means the springs keep the cam retarded so the engine ticks over nicely and pulls well. However, as the revs go up, gas flow will benefit from a more sporty cam configuration and this is partially accomplished by the ECU opening the solenoid and allowing engine oil under pressure, to enter the pulley and act against the springs holding the cam in the retarded position so advancing the cam relative to the pulley teeth and thus making the valve timing more aggressive and allowing the engine to produce a little more power than it would with a fixed pulley. I'm sure there are emission implications too. This wee solenoid valve has a screening filter which is worth checking from time to time for contamination. However I doubt if many ever get checked except by diligent enthusiasts like us.

I'm really scratching my head as to why 8 cam followers, or even 1 cam follower, might be needed unless there's something very wrong with the engine. But without being there and checking it for myself I don't know why this recommendation may have been made, sounds weird to me though.

If you're not happy with doing the belt I think you're very wise to hand it off to a "professional". These engines have been around for years and any competent mechanic should have no bother with it. There's always the possible problem that a Phonic Wheel Relearn may be needed and there's a couple of things of interest regarding this. The recommended way to do the job is to use the locking tool kit to position the crankshaft and camshaft and loosen the camshaft pulley retaining bolt so the pulley can spin freely on the camshaft when the new belt is fitted. After the new belt is fitted and fully tensioned the cam pulley retaining bolt is then tightened up thus ensuring the timing is "spot on". It's very likely the relative position of the camshaft relative to the crankshaft, as perceived by the ECU via the position sensors, will be very slightly different and it's this which causes the ECU to get "upset", light up the engine management light and post a DTC (Diagnostic Trouble Code) which can be read with a scanner - MES strongly recommended. Doing a Phonic Wheel Relearn "teaches" the new relative positions to the ECU and settles it down again.

Now here's the thing. Many small garages won't have the locking tools, especially if they're not Fiat specialists, so will do the belt by the "tippex" method. I don't recommend this to anyone who is not very confident "playing about" with engine valve timing and thus will know what to do if they completely loose the settings. However, because it interests me, I've played about quite a bit with doing this job both with the correct tools and by the "tippex" method and I can say with confidence, if you do it by the tippex method, the MIL stays out! (or has done for every one I've tried doing this way) Once you slacken that cam pulley bolt, there's a good chance you're going to get the light and need to do a relearn. I'm pretty sure I know exactly what's going on with this but it's too involved to discuss here.

By the way, the trouble code posted when a Phonic Wheel Relearn is needed will often be one for a miss fire - the ECU doesn't seem to be able to recognize that a relearn is required and posts for a misfire instead - People on the forum have reported spending substantial amounts of money replacing stuff like coils, HT leads, etc trying to cure the miss fire when what was actually required was a relearn. The big giveaway is that although the ECU may be flagging up a miss fire there's not evidence of it when driving. So no uneven tickover, no jerking about, in fact none of the "classic" indicators of misfiring.

And, just to finish off for now, I'd recommend cleaning the MAP sensor at every major service, maybe even every year. It's only held in with one screw (to the side of the throttle body) It gets contaminated with oil from the breather system and I find it makes quite a difference to how the engine pulls if you clean it - I clean mine with a dedicated MAF sensor cleaner but I'd think something like brake cleaner would do the job just fine - make sure it's completely dried off before running the engine.

By the way RedPeril, if you do the cabin (pollen) filter, do let me know how you get on. I find the one on my Boy's 2012 car is a bit of a swine to do and has to be "scrunched up" a bit to get it to go in. Seems to go back to it's proper shape once in though.

Still no delivery from EVRi!
 
Where one has quoted including "cam followers" that sounds like he thinks it has hydraulic tappets, what does anyone else think?
That would explain it Mike - not a lot you can do with worn'damaged hydraulic tappets is there. I don't think this engine has them, my boy's are solid with shims.
 
Oh, Triiiiiing, Man at the door -------------- Hooray! It's the bits for the strimmer - and nothing broken either! (like everything now a days it's plastic) Shouldn't take long to get it working and back to it's, very elderly, owner. It's parts for the spool feed. It's got a strange arrangement whereby the feed advances by one "click" every time the machine is started with excess cord being cut off by a blade mounted on the shield. I don't like it. My machine, admittedly a rather more commercial petrol engined device, has to have it's cord advanced manually. I can see this wee electric machine wasting a lot of cord if it advances the cord feed every time it's stopped and restarted? Anyway, I'm not familiar with it yet so maybe I've misunderstood how it works. If i get stuck in right now I should have it done and back to him for tea time.
 
By the way RedPeril, if you do the cabin (pollen) filter, do let me know how you get on. I find the one on my Boy's 2012 car is a bit of a swine to do and has to be "scrunched up" a bit to get it to go in. Seems to go back to it's proper shape once in though.
Autodata 2012 doesn't say much about pollen filter.
 

Attachments

  • DSCF0960.JPG
    DSCF0960.JPG
    458.2 KB · Views: 30
Autodata 2012 doesn't say much about pollen filter.
Yes, it all looks quite simple in the manual, but, in the event, "stuff" gets in the way and prevents it being fed straight in so it has to go in at an angle but it can only engage with the casing if you "bend" it. First time I tried it I was sure I was going to ruin the element but it springs back into shape inside the case.
 
I'm really scratching my head as to why 8 cam followers, or even 1 cam follower, might be needed unless there's something very wrong with the engine. But without being there and checking it for myself I don't know why this recommendation may have been made, sounds weird to me though.

Thanks again for all the replies.

From my perspective, I've had one garage, as reported, adding 8 cam followers to the parts list and this being seriously questioned (see above) and another garage swearing blind that mine is a hydraulic tappet engine. I've contacted other garages who have been vague on the phone or not included anything relating to tappets in their quotes.. I've contacted the garage sporting the 8 cam follower addition to the parts list but I've had no reply yet.

Consensus on the Forum seems to be that my car has mechanical tappets so only if they need adjusting it will be a shim job.

My Punto is running fine, save for the slight juddering on high gear deacceleration but I've had help here on the Forum relating to that.

The pollen filter pic from the ADM is handy, thanks bugsymike. Hope the strimmer repair goes well PAJ and thanks for solving the VVT mystery for me..
 
Hope the strimmer repair goes well PAJ and thanks for solving the VVT mystery for me..
The strimmer repair/reassembly went well and all back together and working as it should. The line feed does indeed advance with every start from zero rpm. it throws out an additional 15mm of cord every time and I can see no way to stop it doing this - even mentions it as an automatic line feed feature facilitating easy use in the manual! To me it just looks like a way to sell more line? I'm not that keen on bump feeds but even that would be much more useful than this idea.

I'm pretty underwhelmed by the machine. It uses 1.0mm thick line which is just too light duty to be of much use in my opinion. My own petrol machine, which is a medium duty jobbie, uses 2.4mm line which I buy in 90 metre reels at a cost of around £15.00p whereas this wee machine has a minute, pre wound reel costing almost £5.00p. Here's a pic of them both for comparison:

P1110166.JPG

The black thing is the wee machine's spool. I get multiple loadings of cord for my machine from that one big pack
Here it is in comparison with the head on my machine:

P1110163.JPG

and a close up of it mounted to it's machine:

P1110164.JPG

Time will tell of course but I think he's going to find this difficult to use as I've seen people using machines with very light weight cord like this and mostly what happens is they break the cord repeatedly. I just wish I'd known he was intending to buy something like this because I could probably have got him a more robust used machine for less money. Ah well!
 
I'm going to have the timing belt checked/replaced with my 2009 1.4L 8 valve Grande having done about 60,000 miles since it was last changed (too soon?) and the Fiat service schedule says to replace the spark plugs and adjust the tappets at this interval. Also, I see the auxilliary belt and water pump should be replaced. I'm not experiencing any misfiring but a slight shuddering occasionally takes place when deaccelerating in fourth gear. The total mileage of the car is 94,000.

One garage I contacted said that the tappets are self adjusting. Is this right?

Any advice or experience would be great.
I'm going to have the timing belt checked/replaced with my 2009 1.4L 8 valve Grande having done about 60,000 miles since it was last changed (too soon?) and the Fiat service schedule says to replace the spark plugs and adjust the tappets at this interval. Also, I see the auxilliary belt and water pump should be replaced. I'm not experiencing any misfiring but a slight shuddering occasionally takes place when deaccelerating in fourth gear. The total mileage of the car is 94,000.

One garage I contacted said that the tappets are self adjusting. Is this right?

Any advice or experience would be great.

I'm going to have the timing belt checked/replaced with my 2009 1.4L 8 valve Grande having done about 60,000 miles since it was last changed (too soon?) and the Fiat service schedule says to replace the spark plugs and adjust the tappets at this interval. Also, I see the auxilliary belt and water pump should be replaced. I'm not experiencing any misfiring but a slight shuddering occasionally takes place when deaccelerating in fourth gear. The total mileage of the car is 94,000.

One garage I contacted said that the tappets are self adjusting. Is this right?

Any advice or experience would be great.
IT should read 'check valve clearance' really.. Yes they are shims.

OK, firstly if it's not tapperty when hot, leave well alone, it will not tap for a few seconds on start up when cold, that really only applies to hydraulic lifters, your shims sit in a 'bath' of oil in a sort of trough, so oil is there from start up, a second or so later the oil will rain down on them from either the spray bar or the cascade type rocker box if fitted.

Its not a bad job at all, I've just checked my shim tolerances and found one is out of tolerance and hence I have one more pronounced ticking when hot, a few second hand shims on ebay but the dealers sell them at four to the packet and around £15 for the four, but special order from Italy. (four in the pack will consist of the next increments, ie, I need a 2:45, so in the pack will be a 2:35,2:40,2:45 and a 2:50)

The faff comes about because you have to basically do the job at least twice, once, to measure the tolerances and if any are out take the shim out and note its thickness under neith or with a micrometer. Then you do a calculation of : the tappet measurement of the existing gap with your feeler gauge, minus what the factory specification is, plus the tappet shim thickness, this will give you the shim size you NEED.

obviously the shim/s will have to be ordered so unless you don't intend to use the car it's all back together and do the job again when you have the new shims.

I could not find my shim removal push the bucket down tool anywhere and I could not find one on ebay either, I just pressed the perimeter of the bucket down with a soft metal dowel by hand and fished the shim out.
Mine are on order and will do it at a later date, when it's cooler and when I get back from the NC500 😎
 
I've heard that said about the old Jag XK engines. Did they suffer seat recession then?
Sorry Jock, only just read that bit, I don't think they were known for it as pretty well built and the few I worked on had no problems in that direction.
I do have a very primitive tool I made to adjust the timing chain, only used it the once, it had a peg to depress a locking pin and two pegs to engage and twist the tensioner sprocket around. It did work but very basic.:)
 
OP's engine does have VVT. But does it matter? No if he's going to the garage to get the belts done. (y)

Does it need clearances adjusted? Probably not, but they can be checked.
 
OP's engine does have VVT. But does it matter? No if he's going to the garage to get the belts done. (y)

Does it need clearances adjusted? Probably not, but they can be checked.
IT does matter yes, one engine has shims, the other does not.....

The garage doing the belts has nothing to do with valve adjusting, two totally separate jobs..


"Does it need clearances adjusted? Probably not, but they can be checked" is what I said at the start, the OP says the garage told him they need 'adjusting' they don't, they need checking first then adjusting if any are out of tolerance, being as its VVT, it has no adjustable tappets...

Its all sorted now we know what engine it has.
 
Well, the op was not going to do it by himself so it does not matter.

That engine doesn't have hydraulic lifters either. So whatever, the garage should know.
 
Back
Top