I thought they were different the mk2 looks flatter
True along the top edge, by 6mm, but same along the bottom.
Pity to fit a mk.2 screen to a mk.1, as it's printed with dots and decoration that doesn't look right. Acoording to Autoglass, a mk.2 screen is now the standard item they bring along to a mk.1 car.
But mk.1 screen is also 8mm taller than mk.2 screen, on centre line, brings the glass edge v close, almost touches the mk.2 metal at top, while bottom and side margins are as normal. So it's surprising that any kind of rubber would get round that.
As I said, my v late mk.1 seems to have mk.2 metal at top, so the new mk.1 screen that I have doesn't fit well - it's too tall and too 'crowned' at the top.
I'm thinking of getting the the mk.1 screen fitted by bonding - the bonding compound wd then be 6mm thicker than it should be, at top centre. I might slice the rubber gasket into simple semicircle section, and face-bond it over the joint so it looks right, hopefully obscuring the top-centre mismatch between glass and metal.
Any comments?