| | #1 | ||
| Punto GT vs Abarth Selespeed vs Abarth manual Who can tell me about driving experiences with these models? I came from a '98 Punto GT (130hp) and last February I've replaced it by an Abarth Selespeed. But I found the Abarth to be faster than the Punto only at speeds above 170Km/h or so. Which of course, is less than 1% of my car use. The fuel consuption is also higher than the Punto. Since the Abarth has more torque than the Punto at relatively low revs (3500rpms), I wonder why I notice that much difference for the Punto. I know we don't feel any speed with the Stilo, but I also notice that's harder to pull away from the typical Turbo diesel cars. Something that didn't happened with the Punto GT. I also like to hear about speed and acceleration figures for the manual gearbox abarth, and/or driving experiences compaired with the selespeed or Punto GT. Michael
__________________
| |||
| |
|
| | #2 | ||
| Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Posts: 2,352
Thanks: 0 Trader Rating: (0) | The punto GT is a proper lightweight hot hatch, the Abarth is a comfy cruiser, its never gonna beat the GT apart from on top end. Stilo TURBO!!!!(diesel)
__________________
| ||
| |
|
| | #3 | ||
| i also read an article saying that stilo abarth is not a "racing car" as focus st170 or civic R or megane sport .... stilo unlike cars mentioned above has preety big engine and its ment to be a cruiser on the road ... just compare the weight of the punto and stilo and you fill found out ... once i had a chance to drive UNO TURBO RACING ... i think it had around 120-130bhp but I'm sure that it was lighter than 900kg ... its a BOMB on the ROAD. FIAT STILO 1.6 3dR Tiziano Red Sub=Pioneer TS WX20LPA AUTOMOBILE SK
__________________
| |||
| |
|
| | #4 | ||||||||
But I guess It makes diference. I guess I just want a Turbo for my Stilo! :P Michael
__________________
| |||||||||
| |
|
| | #5 | ||
|
__________________
| |||
| |
|
| | #6 | ||
| Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Fife, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Posts: 1,874
Thanks: 0 Trader Rating: (0) | Wow that means the 1.2 Stilo weighs about the same as the Punto GT, might explain the cars sprightliness! 53 plate, Stilo 3-door, Sassy grey, Alloys to follow, 1.2 Active, 5-Disc CD-Changer -- 45mpg!
__________________
| ||
| |
|
| | #7 | ||
| <font face="Comic Sans MS"></font id="Comic Sans MS"><font size="6"></font id="size6"> IM prety certain that the punto gt and the stilo abarth 0-60 are both 8.5 s 1.6 3 dr K&N, full ss eghaust twin 3" tailpipes full engine remap, abarth sideskirts 5 dr spoiler louc
__________________
| |||
| |
|
| | #8 | ||
| Cymru Am Byth! |
__________________
| ||
| |
|
| | #9 | ||
| Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Posts: 2,352
Thanks: 0 Trader Rating: (0) | The stats can be the same, but as we all know 0-60 times don't always give an accurate impression of real world performance, an aparently fast car can disappoint and vice versa. Stilo TURBO!!!!(diesel)
__________________
| ||
| |
|
| | #10 | ||
| Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Smoke on Trent, United Kingdom.
Posts: 81
Thanks: 0 Trader Rating: (0) | The fastest car I ever owned was an MG which I spared no expense on modifying....Hell that car would shift.. and I mean shift. It had a full race engine apart from the camshaft which I had modified to make the car more tractable at lower revs by reducing the valve over-lap. I imposed a rev limit of 8500 on the engine and all else was lightened where ever possible. What your after is power/weight and that car regularly produced 120bhp at the wheels on the Dyno. A std. Midget would produce about 45bhp. This is the trouble with the Stilo and other modern cars...they are too heavy for good performance. Adding a turbo helps as it makes the car feel quicker in mid-range where it really counts. At the end of the day its all about gas flow and forced induction helps here also. 1.8 5 Door in Sassi Grey Comfort Pack 1
__________________
| ||
| |
|
| | #11 | ||
| Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Posts: 2,352
Thanks: 0 Trader Rating: (0) | To make a stilo feel properly fast it would need >200bhp, 250bhp would put it right up there;) Stilo TURBO!!!!(diesel)
__________________
| ||
| |
|
| | #12 | ||
| Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: stenhousemuir/scotland, United Kingdom.
Posts: 351
Thanks: 0 Trader Rating: (0) | its not how fast it goes that matters, its how fast it feels. i had a 1275GT mini that was not fast, but it felt like the fastest car on the planet. TOP FUN.
__________________
| ||
| |
|
| | #13 | |||||
I mean Punto GT 1.4 8v turbocharged, not Punto HGT 1.8 16V. ...And I can tell you for my experience that the Punto is a lot more faster climbing on speed. My Selespeed Abarth only shows better acceleration at speeds above 160Km/h (about 100mph). Michael
__________________
| ||||||
| |
|
| | #14 | |||||
The other day I decided to give it a run on the freeway and caught my girldfriend retouching her makeup on the mirror while I was doing 140mph. I guess that says it all. |) I will look for a Turbo in the future. I miss the kick! Michael
__________________
| ||||||
| |
|
| | #15 | ||
| Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Posts: 2,352
Thanks: 0 Trader Rating: (0) |
__________________
| ||
| |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 16 or 17 inch wheels for Punto HGT / Abarth | punto_power_nr_1 | Lets Talk FIAT | 9 | 25-06-2006 17:01 |
| | DOG | Stilo | 8 | 25-05-2004 19:05 |
| | broadfield | Punto | 4 | 07-11-2003 04:12 |