Technical Springs or dampers? (WHY THE RIDE IS HARSHER AFTER LOWERING)

Currently reading:
Technical Springs or dampers? (WHY THE RIDE IS HARSHER AFTER LOWERING)

chrisunoman

Prominent member
Joined
Mar 26, 2004
Messages
3,134
Points
532
Location
Manchester
Springs or dampers?

Ive had my Uno lowered 60mm on Jamex springs and shocks, but now the ride is unbearably hard!!! :bang:

Im thinking of putting my 35mm springs back on to rectify this, but ive heard off my mate that its probably the shorter shock absorbers thats making the ride harder.... but i thought it was the springs that made the ride harder.... :confused:

Could anyone tell me whos correct??
 
Re: Springs or dampers?

guessing your shocks and springs were a set, they're matched to each other. i wouldnt go mix'n'matching them.

if the shocks are for a 60mm drop, they'll be shortened and may not even fit with 35mm drop springs on
 
Re: Springs or dampers?

chrisunoman said:
Ive had my Uno lowered 60mm on Jamex springs and shocks, but now the ride is unbearably hard!!! :bang:

Im thinking of putting my 35mm springs back on to rectify this, but ive heard off my mate that its probably the shorter shock absorbers thats making the ride harder.... but i thought it was the springs that made the ride harder.... :confused:

Could anyone tell me whos correct??

How much the lowering kit cost ya chris?? im lookin into doing it on mine. Well if you dont wanna keep them on the car i'll have em off ya. I like a harsh ride :D

Just get a cushion on your seat :D :D :D

As for the reason, they both contribute to the ride. The springs do the major support of the car, including height etc. But the shocks are what smooth off the little bumps etc. So if you uprate them too you will feel all the little lumps and bumps, but all in the name of great suspension. And due to the shock arm being reduced, i dont think you will get away with putting your 35mm springs back on as you will probably find they are too big.
 
Re: Springs or dampers?

The kit cost me £170, good value really. Im going to keep it like it is now, last week it pissed me off abit, it handles reallllllly well and dont think it will handle as well if i mess around with the springs. Im beginning to get used to the firm ride now, very slowly mind, and im finding routes where the roads are nice and new and smooth hehe!

Just off topic, im fairly sure this engine would fit into an uno quite easily, would be a good conversion for someone, you could even use the alloys too, http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=10382&item=4525780375&rd=1

and these alloys will prob go cheap, with a quick spray would look good as new http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=28648&item=7951288376&rd=1
 
Last edited:
This post contains affiliate links which may earn a commission at no additional cost to you.
Re: Springs or dampers?

Hi Chris M8,

It might be a little late for you, having made such a good job covering the seats, but could maybe try Uno Turbo or SX seats. Wiout lowering they make a big difference to the ride… (y)

Regards All,
Louie Bee
 
Re: Springs or dampers?

Chris,

Ya never get something for nothing... :)
I think the 60mm-drop springs are perhaps the culprit but it's too hard to say for sure. 'Both' was the reason as Luke said. I have -40mm springs on my Uno Turbo with new Munroe 'Reflex' (i.e. pretty budget!) shocks. My springs have 'settled' since they were fitted, just with the car sitting in the garage - I haven't driven it for six months and now it looks really low!

Ride quality is a complex subject.
As standard, the ride quality in an Uno is awful :) Uno Turbo is kinda OK but if the shocks are worn then it's horrible because it's too soft and 'rocks' from side to side! All Unos are a bit flexible IMHO meaning a big shake of the dashboard when you hit something in the road. I can only imagine this getting worse with harder suspension - nothing you can do about that.

You've probably got some bigger alloys with low-profile tyres. That is going to make the road noise louder and the ride more sensitive to the 'texture' of the road. However it's also going to reduce that 'spindly', wandering feel of Unos on 145 tyres... so in my books that makes the ride quality better.

As Louie says, the design of the seat makes a difference. Softer is not necessarily better since you don't want to be rolling around (ever driven an Austin Princess? or any other 70's BL car? THAT's how bad seats can be!)

Shock absorbers, particularly shock absorbers that are stiffer than normal in order to cope with stiffer springs, are going to make the ride more 'choppy' - more sharp displacements - but they are also going to reduce the diving when you brake or the lifting when you accelerate, and you won't 'float' over bumps during cornering. Thus, that's all going to improve the ride quality in some sense even though it feels more choppy.

Springs - lowering the centre of gravity reduces the roll during cornering which, for the passengers in particular, is more comfortable. Yet of course the decreased suspension travel means that the spring has to be stiffer to prevent bottoming-out. Thus when you hit a bump, the spring won't deflect as far as a standard spring, meaning that the bodyshell will take some of the impact and you'll feel it.

On a lightweight car like the Uno, something called the 'sprung/unsprung mass' comes into effect. The unsprung mass is everything that moves when a wheel hits a bump: the wheel itself, the brake assembly, the suspension arm, and the strut. The sprung mass is everything else. Cars like the Uno have relatively lightweight suspension/wheels, but the bodyshell/engine etc. is also lightweight. This means that when the unsprung mass moves (hitting a bump) the sprung mass starts to move too (transfer of momentum).

Cars like the Austin Allegro were particularly bad because the suspension was made out of heavy cast-iron and the gas/liquid springing was under-damped (have you experienced the bouncy ride?)

Ever noticed how a Rolls Royce, or a Bristol, or a Mercedes, weighs a lot more than the 700-845kg of an Uno? That's the basic ingredient of their smooth ride, not just softer springs or dampers. In fact, just about any newer car weighs more. That allows the sprung mass to be proportionately more than the unsprung mass, particularly with BMW's aluminium suspension - the goal of that is to reduce the unsprung mass and therefore improve the ride quality. It's expensive, but it works.

Now on the other hand YOU have probably increased the unsprung mass of your Uno - by fitting bigger wheels. So, you can't possibly hope that the ride quality will improve ;)

Of course ride quality is a subjective issue. The engineers at FIAT tried very hard for the best compromise (and not just to save money: it cost them a lot to fine-tune the spring and damper rates) so you can't really hope to improve on the compromise overall. However, you can move the compromise towards your personal preference. I would prefer my Uno to feel glued-to-the-road at all times with plenty of stability and feel in the steering, even if it means that the ride becomes less smooth. That's because the ride was never smooth to start with, compared with bigger cars... so why try to preserve it?

If in all this you were looking for an answer to your question - yeah, try the 35mm springs, if they still fit... and you'll need another wheel alignment so more expense :)

Make sure that your Uno doesn't handle dangerously, i.e. check for how the steering responds if you encounter a bump mid-corner, make sure the car is not bouncing as you drive down the road (because that could reduce tyre grip), and also be aware that handling 'on the limit' probably gives you less advance warning (understeer) than it used to, so know the warning signs before you spin... Unfortunately all these things begin to occur as you go lower and stiffer, particularly if (for some reason) the shocks are not stiff enough for the springs.

I see that I've written heaps on my 'complex subject', oh well, probably no-one will read it ;) I've wasted a great deal of time adjusting suspension on a particular car (my FIAT 128 Coupe) and I know that sometimes it was overall worse than standard. It really is a world of compromise, the 'standard' settings are sometimes the best, and only you can decide what is important if you stray from those.

-Alex
 
Last edited:
Re: Springs or dampers?

Now that ive changed the rear top mounts the ride is 10 times better! It doesnt seem as shakey now over bumps in the road and generally feels a lot more solid cornering.

So now im going to leave the suspension as it is, ive spent far too much on it anyway! Im not doing anymore mods on it, only general maintenance, cos i want to change my car when ive got the money.

Thanks for everyones comments, much appreciated!
 
Pure Gold!

Thanks for all that Alex M8 You’re an Absolute Star!!! (y) Man with many strings to bow…


alexGS said:
I see that I've written heaps on my 'complex subject', oh well, probably no-one will read it ;) I've wasted a great deal of time adjusting suspension on a particular car...

...-Alex

No Way M8 - pure GOLD :cool: .

I Still have concerns, but Ill post them on my £320 thread (https://www.fiatforum.com/showthread.php?t=24793)… ;)

Regards All,
Louie Bee.
 
Re: Springs or dampers?

Alex, you are spot on with your comments about suspension. Many people totally underestimate just how much a car manufacturer goes for an overall compromise to give a quality ride with good handling and road holding. They have access to all kinds of computer based design programs and test facilities, whereas we don't. Just by changing one aspect of the suspension can have drastic consequences.

Another problem with the suspension on the Uno is as you've mentioned, both the suspension AND the bodyshell are comparitively lightweight. Fitting overly hard springs is NOT a good idea with this combination! If the springs are too hard then all that happens is the bumps that should be absorbed by the springs/ shocks get transferred to the bodyshell instead. End result is a car that bounces around all over the road instead of having the tyres stay in contact. This in effect makes the roadholding WORSE, along with giving a very choppy ride.

Of course, people lower their car because it makes it look good. But unless the suspension has been upgraded as a whole the ride/ handling chacteristics will be made worse. Also, people tend to think that the handling characteristics have been improved because of less body roll, but you may well find that on bumpy roads the car will 'let go' earlier than when on standard springs/ shocks. This is because the wheels are in contact with the road LESS because they are bouncing the whole car around on shorter harder springs when compared with longer travel softer springs which absord the road bumps better.

A good example of this is the Citroen 2CV. The body rolls all over the place when cornering and it has long travel suspension, but the soft suspension design keeps the wheels glued to the road. In actual fact, a 2CV has very good road holding along with a soft ride. It just doesn't look or feel it.

The other problem is that when buying upgraded springs you really do get what you pay for. Some of the cheaper sets available have been designed to simply look good as they lower the car. But often they have not had the extensive development that more expensive sets have had, and also the more expensive sets normally come with upgraded dampers as well that are designed to compliment the shocks. Changing the springs alone but using standard shocks is more likely to make the suspension work worse than standard.

Unless the springs and shocks are worn on a standard Uno, it is unlikely to bottom out on big bumps. Therefore, to preserve the ride and handling characteristics when fitting uprated and lowered springs you really need to fit dampers/ shocks with a softer rating.

In fact, the problem with lowering the Uno is the fact that it is such a light car. Most other cars in the same class as the Uno weigh considerably more, and the cheaper uprated spring manufacturers don't take this into account.

Worth bearing in mind too, a little known secret that Lotus have often used on their cars. Lotus' have always been lightweight due to the use of glass fibre body shells. Lotus have also always been known for making very good handling and roadholding suspension.

Now get this. Lotus get their handling from fitting SOFT springs but complimenting this with HARDER shocks/ dampers. This is a better combination for a lightweight car, and Lotus have had years of making reknowned suspension for lightweight cars to prove this.

Therefore I would suspect that the Uno would benefit from a similar philosophy. By all means fit uprated and lowered springs, but really you should then fit softer shocks. Or go the other way (like Lotus) and fit lowered springs but at the same spring ratios as standard and fit harder shocks. The wrong combination is to fit harder springs AND harder shocks!

This is all theory mind, and I haven't done any of this on my Uno. Other than a bit of body roll I don't think my car needs uprated suspension for every day use! Track day use would be a different matter though, but I'm hardly likely to take my 1.0 45 racing! I do admit that it would look good lowered, but as I drive it every day I'm not that fussed. I'd rather keep it feeling like it does than have a bone jarring ride on the UK's every worsening road surfaces.

I am however on the lookout for a Turbo front anti-roll bar. This should reduce rolling under cornering without upsetting the ride quality. Morty Mort has done this to his car and reported that it did indeed improve the handling charateristics as well as reduced body roll. If I had the money I would like to try lowering my car, but I'd go for the same spring ratio as standard with lowered springs (this in effect makes the spring slightly harder as it gives the same resistance over a smaller spring travel) and fit better shocks. I'd also try and go for adjustable shocks so I could try and 'tune' the suspension for optimum performance. The shock damping rates are as important as the spring rates!

So I wonder if anyone else has tried to do more extensive tuning of their Uno's suspension rather than just fitting lowered/ uprated springs? Has anyone fitted adjustable shocks and experimented with the settings? It would be interesting to find out, as from what I've read on here just fitting lowered and uprated springs only seems to give a harsh ride on standard roads. Sure the car looks better, but that's downsided by a much harder, and in some cases, uncomfortable ride. Plus going by suspension theory the roadholding will actually be worse than standard.

Still, as with any modifications half the fun is doing it. If you want to make your car look good by lowering then go for it. Just bear in mind that you may well not actually be improving the road holding or handling unless you uprate ALL the suspension as a whole.

Oh yes, Alex you are a lucky man to have a Fiat 128 coupe! I take it this is the 3P model? They look great and were rated highly in their day. Sadly there are very few in the UK as they tended to rust to bits!

Gotta keep those Uno's running!
 
Re: Springs or dampers?

Thanks 1986Uno45S (I forget your real name, was it Warwick?), I think we agree on everything there :) Incidentally the X1/9 also has soft springs by sportscar standards, but because the rest of the design is right, they corner really well. Hard springs aren't everything, as you well know...

My 128 was a 1974 SL (not the 3P) and it was (and is) in unusually good condition. I finally sold it just over a year ago (returned to standard suspension, though I understand the new owner has meddled with it again and had all the same problems repeated! Those cars are prone to torque steer, particularly with a 'hot' 1500).

ChrisUnoMan, good to hear that you've replaced more worn-out bits, I know those top mountings well, they simply tear apart... After you've fitted uprated suspension it seems to usually cause something else to wear out, it can be a long process getting everything right. One thing's for certain, you don't get full performance from your modifications until all worn parts are replaced. Sounds like you're getting there at last!

Louie - I'll talk to you in a separate thread ;)

-Alex
 
powerflex bushes

luke1985 said:
Might be worth getting some powerflex bushes next as they're bound to go wrong next :D :
:bang: That ll be in the post next I guess – Any recommended retailers?
luke1985 said:
Other than that i think you'll probably have everything covered (y)
Feeling that post thanks 1986Uno45S!!:cool:

I should be OK with Jamex -35mm spring and shock kit I guess :confused:


Regards All,
Louie Bee.
 
Last edited:
Re: Springs or dampers?

Thanks Alex, it's good to see people on the board that have a decent understanding of how a car works. Too many people see adverts for 'uprated' parts and think that just by fitting them all will be fine and great improvements will be made. Quite often this is not the case!

Suspension is a complex subject, and I doubt if the cheaper spring manufacturers do much development in making lowered springs for cars like the Uno. All they know is that if it makes the car lower then the buyers will be happy.

Again, if anyone is thinking of lowering their Uno then I would suggest going for a well known suspension manufacturer that have a spring AND shock kit specifically for the Uno. It will cost more, but just changing the springs alone is a bad idea unless you get the correct shocks to suit the new spring ratios.

It very much is a case of you get what you pay for.

Oh, and I didn't know you could get a 128 coupe in SL spec! Maybe a New Zealand only model? I think in the UK the coupe only came as a '3P' model with the 1300 engine. A nice idea to fit a 1500 engine from an X19 or Strada/ Ritmo for a bit more power, though a shame it brings in a lot of torque steer. I wouldn't mind one myself, but they are very rare in the UK now.

And LouieB, it does pay to shop around and do some research before paying out for suspension upgrades. They do actually race Uno's, so maybe finding someone who builds/ races them you could ask what kind of uprgraded suspension they fitted. I seriously doubt if it would be one of the cheaper spring sets we all see advertised!

And Alex, you must must be getting me mixed up with someone else. I've been called many things, but never Warwick! I'm Chas, from NW London (actually in the USA at the moment) and my daily driver is a 1986 Uno 45S with very little mods. It's fitted with a Uno Turbo tailgate (plastic so it won't ever rust!), an SX instrument pod with tachometer and a set of X1/9 alloy wheels. Other than that I try to keep it looking clean and tidy, and it is in pretty good shape for a 19 year old car. That alone turns heads, as there aren't many nice 1986 cars left on UK roads. I leave the 'Chavving' up of cars to Nova and Saxo owners :p Uno's had style right from the start and look good with clean lines :)
 
Re: Springs or dampers?

Hi Chas,

The guy at the garage tells me he worked on the Lancia racing team before they band class B :confused:, 1 000 CC sounds a lot… also having an UT in 85, and a few others over the years.

These JAMEX Sportsline kits German TüV standard – I must admit I don’t understand what it means.

They retial for € 277,39 + carrage + Vat prob.+ import tax… http://www.jamex.nl/shop/Subgroep_l...Accessoires&SG=SPORTSLINE&Make=FIAT&Model=UNO don’t mention 35mm though.

Kind Regards,

Louie Bee.


Edited as post split - see What’s Chavving?
 
Back
Top