I notice you have an Alfa 164 3L V6, whats it like on fuel with these high cost of petrol guess thats not your every day car?
It's BRILLIANT on petrol, I haven't filled it up since April!
I remember reading about someone with a V8 petrol Range Rover who found it was the most economical vehicle they'd ever owned - because they avoided any unnecessary trip in it...
My friend James was the last to fill up the 164 - he used it for a ~3hr return trip with passengers, and before that it towed the project Uno home on a trailer.
It can return anything from 20mpg around town to 40mpg on a decent trip. And, comfortably over 30mpg when towing an Uno on a trailer. If you have a task that needs the 164, it's an economical car for the task
I drive my 164 about once a month and the experience is worth every minute. When considering the running costs, you also have to bear in mind that the car cost $1000 to purchase (about 340 pounds). :slayer:
I don't really have an 'everyday' car because I don't need to go anywhere every day. In fact I was thinking recently that cars are something of a self-fufilling prophecy - most trips I make have something to do with the car itself. At the moment, the project Uno is the first choice of transport, but after that disappears next week, I'll use my Punto until that gets its driveplate replaced soon, and then I'll drive the Uno Turbo unless its raining, in which case I'll take the 164. Or the scooter.
Even though it's something of a last resort, as you might have guessed by now, I love my 164. It's a competent machine that feels great to drive and is made out of good-quality stuff, and I think the styling is fantastic, perfect proportions. It's really quite different to any other Alfa Romeo before or since. Also I've owned the FIAT Croma and the Lancia Thema, and I'd say the 164 is the overall best of the bunch, though the Lancia/Saab have their own character - the 164 has aged better.
In the summer I expect to invest some time and money in restoring my 164. The engine needs to come out to fix a few minor leaks, the clutch needs replacing (doesn't slip but it's super-heavy), and the front end could do with a respray (chips and scratches - no rust!). I ought to figure out why the passenger's seat motors require a tap from a hammer to get them moving. Also I have a replacement compressor for the climate-control. After all, it has done over 240,000km (150,000 miles).
Rather than undertake this work, earlier this year I decided to buy a 166 instead. That was a 2002 3L V6 auto and had done just under 100,000km. It turned out to be a lemon and I sold it a month later at a $2000 loss, for $7000. The next owner easily spent another $2000 on it. I don't think the 166 is a patch on the 11-years-older 164. My dB meter confirmed that the 164 was quieter (yet the 12V engine sounds better than the 24V) and the 164 is considerably more economical, with quicker acceleration (lower-down torque than the 24V). It's made out of better materials too - the 166's beauty is only skin-deep and the body bends like a banana. And at a count of 15, the 164 has a lot more interior lights
I notice you have a GTV... though I must confess the photo was so small, when I first saw it I thought it was an '86-'91 BMW 3-series
-Alex