Here's an example for you!
2000 - I buy a pair of Ellese tracksuit bottoms for holidays, cost £32.
2006 - Mum buys a pair of Patrick tracksuit bottoms for me, cost £8.
Ellese tracksuit bottoms have zips, drawsting and pockets intact.
Patrick tracksuit bottoms have one duff zip already.
Conclusion the £32 pair are better made.
to the same note, i bought a pair of asda george £8 jeans which i have worn practically non stop for 4 months mainly because i like the style (irrelevant), the point is there is no wear, there has been no tear, they still look good, they dont sag or bag, and they havn't shrunk.
i got a pair of fubu jeans bought for me for my birthday by a very rich friend of mine, £179.99 the tag was still on the label when he gave them to me.
i wore them for a week, washed them, only to find that they had shrunk.
I then discovered that one of the pockets was coming apart at the seems.
Conclusion the £8 jeans are better made...
we come to totally different conclusions based on past experience.
i'd just like to note i didn't start this thread to argue, just to vent some anger at how people tell me i should dress and how society's "BMW effect" (thats an awesome phrase jug) forces people (consciously or unconsciously) to look a certain way.
as for "i think you`ll find the the non brand people are actually buying cheap rip offs of the branded things anyway, cos that what high street fashion does!!"
This is totally untrue, every season a trend is set and retail outlets and designers design ranges around them. the reason you assume the retail outlets are coping branded items is simply down, again, to what you have been taught about fashion. that branded products are the best and therefor anything similar is a copy.
i heard a quote on tv today that reminded me of this thread, it was on a look-a-likes show. where they make people look like celebrities. the make up artist said "you look lust like Camron Diaz" and the girl said "well actually i'm 2 years older than her so technically she looks like me"...