General to service at a dealer or not

Currently reading:
General to service at a dealer or not

Yeah but it means nothing when you go to sell it.

It doesnt matter who stamped it as long as its a garage and its serviced.

See, the MOT is due at the same time and rear tires are need soon, if not before, and also the exhaust is blowing at the flexi-joint, and that might make it fail an MOT to.

at least my road tax is £100 now!
 
To say a genuine Fiat service history is worth nothing is rubbish. If given identical cars with identical prices and mileages and one has been serviced by the manufacturers agent and one is done by kwik fit, 9 out of 10 punters would pick the dealer serviced car. Also Fiat good will policy does not support vehicles serviced outside the dealer network.
 
Big Black Stilo said:
Yeah but it means nothing when you go to sell it.

It doesnt matter who stamped it as long as its a garage and its serviced.

See, the MOT is due at the same time and rear tires are need soon, if not before, and also the exhaust is blowing at the flexi-joint, and that might make it fail an MOT to.

at least my road tax is £100 now!

Well if your car does fail its MOT on the exhaust flexy joint you always have the option of the flexys available at Super-Spanner here in S.Wales (y)
 
NumanR said:
To say a genuine Fiat service history is worth nothing is rubbish. If given identical cars with identical prices and mileages and one has been serviced by the manufacturers agent and one is done by kwik fit, 9 out of 10 punters would pick the dealer serviced car. Also Fiat good will policy does not support vehicles serviced outside the dealer network.

Fiat have a goodwill policy? :eek: Don't know how many forum members would agree with you there.
 
I saved myself a few quid and went somewhere else to get mine serviced. When it came to selling my car, the Vauxhall dealers asked if it had service history I said yes, they then asked if it was stamped I said yes but the work was carried out by an independant motorsports specialist they said that's cool, no problem at all as long as it's stamped.
He asked if there was a particular reason for going elsewhere I said yeah, price and quality of service.
 
NumanR said:
To say a genuine Fiat service history is worth nothing is rubbish. If given identical cars with identical prices and mileages and one has been serviced by the manufacturers agent and one is done by kwik fit, 9 out of 10 punters would pick the dealer serviced car. Also Fiat good will policy does not support vehicles serviced outside the dealer network.

Hmmm... after being offered £2800 p/x on mine against a Grade Punto yesterday by the Fiat Dealer whom serviced mine last time I'm thinking it's for the new owners benefit and my detriment (read cost!)... if it wasnt for the Autocare warranty on the car think I would service it my self and pay to have the service indicator re-set & book stamped.

@BBS - Feel for you man... just had a complete exhaust, set of new tyres recently and only 1400K to go to 48K Service + Tax out end April :eek: Been quoted £269 for 48K by FIAT :chin: time to shop around me thinks...
 
Would prefer to be hands on myself I then know that it is done and not wonder if any unsuspected things may happen :rolleyes: any complicated things like the electrics etc I will then entrust that to a friend who has his own garage and as far as the service stamps are concerned after a ripe old age if you sell your car on does it matter who has stamped the service book cos normally when i sell mine its in better nick than when I bought it :)
 
IMO, to way to go is to self service. The reduced cost is considerable. You can write down everything that is done. In 17 years of car ownership I have never paid for a service, ever.

The only things to be changed is oil and filter, the rest is 'checked' - a monkey can do that - if it actually gets done.

So if you service the car and save per service. So, after a few years and services, is the increased value of having a dealer stamp going to match that absolute saving?? Probably not. To be perfectly honest, the dealer stamp means nothing to me. Based on my experiences of Fiat dealers, the stamp would be detrimental, I'd prefer to see an independant stamp there.

At the end of the day, does to cost justify itself and I don't think it does. my car has the service due indicator on, has done all the time I've had it. Bothered? No. Warranty is so poor anyway, it sometimes seems to be a pointless piece of paper.
And I am not overly negative about dealers - just realistic based on my experiences for the last 17 years.



Bottom line - dealer service is overpriced . . . . . fact
 
The many things that have failed are not servicable items, and are not even checked during a service. So your 2 points are totally unconnected. No other car of mine has ever had these reliability problems.

Note:- reliability and not durability.
 
Think the level of sophistication is the Stilo's downfall... Stilo_ste your right and that is my main problem with FIAT's servicing costs not a lot of doing goes on mainly 'inspection' & Morritt dont fancy your chances of a trouble free ownership experience much... being as you have an abarth - even more fancy gear to go wrong :eek:
 
wotnowarninglight said:
Morritt dont fancy your chances of a trouble free ownership experience much... being as you have an abarth - even more fancy gear to go wrong :eek:

well i didnt have any problems on tuesday ...
 
Back
Top