angry he got the sack or angry they paid him to start with?
If you read it, it states "The former footballer, who has raised more than £5m for charity over the past 20 years"yeah he was paid fundrasier, but he cost more than he raised that is why he is sacked,
Why wouldn't he get paid, as part of his role as director of fundraising - I don't see any issue with that :shrug:
All because it is a charity, doesn't mean to say that payroll costs are neglible - they need to be at commercial levels, otherwise they won't attract the right calibre of leadership.
Look at the 2011 accounts once they are published; I have already had a read of their 2010 accounts, have you?This guy might have raised £20k for the charity but how much did the charity spend on him in terms of wages, support etc?