personally i think the lets all hate stu thread would have been less trouble
lol this is gona get uglycustard boy said:personally i think the lets all hate stu thread would have been less trouble
what stu? ahhh thats more like itAlex B said:lol this is gona get ugly
CheeseMaster said:I'm expecting another blood vessel blown reply coming my way soon and probably a few more insults to add to the fun.
poggy said:Dear Mr Cheesemaster,
Fear not, I am not even close to bursting a blood vessel but I appreciate your concern. I was just pointing out that your post was a simplistic view of MPV's and not based on a lot of fact.
I have an MPV but the kids are not at school yet, so my MPV is not used on a school run. Using your logic they obviously are all used for the school run,
but they are not, am I allowed to have one now.
CheeseMaster wrote:
"Please. Some might need these tanks but..."
I base it on a survey of the close knit neighbourhood where I spent 10 years in Hampshire. They are very representative. You see I'm not just from one area - I know many areas of the United Kingdom well enough to have seen the same patterns and the same levels of ownership amongst friends of my family and friends of my friends.My kids will go to a local school, which is about 5 minutes walk away and they will walk. One of our friends has a MPV and motorbike, so there is one who doesn't have two cars. Just because I know this person I am not saying other people don't have two cars, but you seem so sure the majority do.
Quite, but I pointed out specific incidences also that you haven't addressed and I also said that 9 years worth of having to drive through the same school run the aggressiveness of the School Run Parent In MPV/4x4 far far outweighed any other.If you look at the school run, it doesn't matter whether you drive a car, MPV, lorry or 4x4 they are all pushing not just the 4x4's or MPV's.
The traffic calming measures around schools need to be sorted out, not the type of car used.
That I have heard of before happenning elsewhere. It's a symptom of the sick, arrogant self centered society that England is becoming. However, you can't make changes to them can you? But parents on the school run CAN group together and help to PROTECT their kids by car pooling, minibusses or alternating MPV use. Oh and not leaving it too late to drop the kids off at school ( and therefore not getting into a panic behind the wheel and doing stupid things ) in good time. I saw it every day, not a day would go past when my heart wouldn't go "eeek" at some bit of MPV/4x4 driver cretinousness and sometimes ( but far less ) other parent driver cretinous on the school run.The traffic patrol lady recently quit at the local school because of the amount of abuse she got from drivers when she took the kids across the road.
Oh come on. So not one parent of any child on a school run ( either to that school or another ) was behind one of these incidents?These were not people dropping off kids, but other motorists.
I used to walk to school, but things are a lot more dangerous on the road now and I can appreciate that parents don't always feel comfortable letting there kids walk to school having to cross busy roads.
Please don't play chop logic games with me. I made my position clear on the matter and said what my preferred solution was.I still don't understand your comment about size, your now saying that a mondeo is too big for the school run because it is the same size as a Ulysse, so it's not just MPV's or 4x4's. What is your preferred size if school run vehicle.
I said that MPVing 2.2 kids to school each day and jostling for position on a road crowded with other MPVs and kids was an indulgence.I presume you take the bus or train to work as you feel that taking the car is an idulgence. Many parents drop there kids off on the way to work.
Goodness gracious me. Please do the courtesy of reading my responses through before you reply will you? I'm losing the will to reply here . 10% of a Ulysse price per parent over 30 childrens worth of parents would pay for a much safer alternative. Hell, councils used to pay for it, then we all voted conservative and that had to stop.A Fiat Ulysse starts at the same price as a standard family car, so if took 10% of the money saved you wouldn't get much I am afraid.
Yet again, something I never said. I said a heavier vehicle has more momentum. Look up momentum and see my comments about pancakes.I suggest you look at braking distance tests for cars and revise your comment about all heavier cars taking longer to stop, it's not true.
Emergancy assistance wont help you if a child is in your deadzones/blindspots. Ask yourself whether that pedestrian safety covers reversing into children that you can't see.Also the Renault Espace has 2 stars for pedestrian safety, so it is better than a lot of cars and this is the same test applied to both vehicles. It also about the technology of the car, if it has emergency assistance etc.
What have you edited it again? . I quoted what you said, but you didn't read my comment properly if you even have to ask whether or not I was being universally inclusive or not. * edited for poor sentence construction.I agree you didn't mention my wife or Stu's, but I only asked if you were saying that with your general comment about MPV drivers (read my comment again).
Firstly you brought up maturity, not me. Secondly I made the comment here:I don't have a baby on board sticker, but if you want to talk about maturity saying all MPV's with a Baby on Board sticker must have the baby at the wheel is a highly mature comment.
What, you looking for him to leap to your defence? I'm sure he will, but so what? If it makes you and him ask a question about what he is really doing with that sticker, or question the rationale behind the choice in vehicle to even a tiny amount then as far as I am concerned, job done.By the way Stu had a Baby on Board sticker so you must have been referring to people like him driving MPV's.
As I said, some people "need" MPVs, but thats the whole point isn't it? However did people cope before MPVs had sliding doors? It must have been like the flintstones. However, I have transported children about and can understand the space issue. But doors do open on the side of cars, and I've found that kids have other problems with MPVs and sliding doors - like the tendancy to leave stuff in the way stopping other kids from making it to the sliding door in the first place. There are practical problems with MPV interiors for which sliding doors or opening doors make no difference. In fact, I think sliding doors are a good thing if only from the point of view of not having some idiot giving me yet another parking dent.MPV's with sliding doors are safer to enter and exit and my comment about whether you have kids was to find out if you know the practicalities of transporting kids, that was all. If you haven't then you may not know some of the problems there are.
I have seen plenty of cars pull stupid stunts with and without a Baby on Board sticker, so how is the sticker relevant.
Let me decode the negatives, I've already had to explain the hypocrisy to you so no need to repeat that. No, I'm clearly not saying that cars without baby on board stickers are perfect non aggressive drivers. Just the drivers aren't hypocrites when they do it. Fools, but not hypocrites. Equally I never said that ALL BoB drivers drive like maniacs.Are you saying you haven't seen cars without a Baby on Board sticker ever pull a stupid driving stunt. This is the type of comment, which I think is not well founded.
What did you edit out the use of expletives and the rudeness? Perhaps you are blind to your own faults, god knows we all are to a certain extent, but I have found your replies to mine in this thread like watching a boy racer pulling handbrake turns in a car with a "Baby On Board" sticker dangling around in the back window.As regards maturity, which part of my argument was not mature, please enlighten me as it all looked reasonably argued.
poggy said:Sorry it was not my intention to insult you, but I think you did that quite well to anybody who has a Baby on Board sticker.
poggy said:Baby on Board sticker.
arseofbox said:I dont give a flying ... yeah about MPVs, I just hate those placard things.
I dont drive any less sensibly or manically (as needed) with those buggers around, and showing one wont stop me or any other sensible motorist tailgating you for doing 60 in the middle lane of a motorway (if you cant overtake).
Same thing with compressed gas. By rights when Im carrying my SCUBA kit from here to there, if its full, I should display a Compressed Gas placard, same applies for any other compressed gas mind as its all pretty dangerous . Ive tried with and without and even if your showing one people still drive like dicks.
Not worth the effort.
CheeseMaster said:Quite and who adds to those busy roads at peak times with nasty noxious fumes when they are otherwise so paranoid about child health? Where does the start stop dangerous traffic come from?
CheeseMaster said:Thats why I pointed out school busses. You know we used to have to line up in the school premises and wait for all the busses to finish their manouvers. Then we would get on ( line by line ). Then we would get dropped off at various stopping points. ?
CheeseMaster said:Please don't play chop logic games with me. I made my position clear on the matter and said what my preferred solution was.
CheeseMaster said:Goodness gracious me. Please do the courtesy of reading my responses through before you reply will you? I'm losing the will to reply here . 10% of a Ulysse price per parent over 30 childrens worth of parents would pay for a much safer alternative. Hell, councils used to pay for it, then we all voted conservative and that had to stop.
CheeseMaster said:Yet again, something I never said. I said a heavier vehicle has more momentum. Look up momentum and see my comments about pancakes.
CheeseMaster said:Emergancy assistance wont help you if a child is in your deadzones/blindspots. Ask yourself whether that pedestrian safety covers reversing into children that you can't see.
CheeseMaster said:What have you edited it again? . I quoted what you said, but you didn't read my comment properly if you even have to ask whether or not I was being universally inclusive or not. * edited for poor sentence construction.
CheeseMaster said:Firstly you brought up maturity, not me. Secondly I made the comment here:
"Baby on board? Yeah, in the driving seat."
which was clearly flippant.
CheeseMaster said:However, I'm prepared to back that comment up and question the level of arrogance and maturity of anyone who has one of those dangling up in their rear windscreen or stuck to it. If it was about "accident safety" and not being a "mind my child" arrogant then it would be stuck to both of the SIDE windows and not in a position where a rear ender will make it invisible or rolling the car meaning it will flop down on the ceiling.
CheeseMaster said:What, you looking for him to leap to your defence? I'm sure he will, but so what? If it makes you and him ask a question about what he is really doing with that sticker, or question the rationale behind the choice in vehicle to even a tiny amount then as far as I am concerned, job done.
CheeseMaster said:However did people cope before MPVs had sliding doors? It must have been like the flintstones. However, I have transported children about and can understand the space issue. But doors do open on the side of cars, and I've found that kids have other problems with MPVs and sliding doors - like the tendancy to leave stuff in the way stopping other kids from making it to the sliding door in the first place. There are practical problems with MPV interiors for which sliding doors or opening doors make no difference. In fact, I think sliding doors are a good thing if only from the point of view of not having some idiot giving me yet another parking dent.
CheeseMaster said:It is relevant because it is an appeal to other car drivers to be careful around the car ( admit it - it is ) and when its been driven poorly it is the ultimate in hypocrisy, don't you think?
Let me decode the negatives, I've already had to explain the hypocrisy to you so no need to repeat that. No, I'm clearly not saying that cars without baby on board stickers are perfect non aggressive drivers. Just the drivers aren't hypocrites when they do it. Fools, but not hypocrites. Equally I never said that ALL BoB drivers drive like maniacs.
CheeseMaster said:What did you edit out the use of expletives and the rudeness? Perhaps you are blind to your own faults, god knows we all are to a certain extent, but I have found your replies to mine in this thread like watching a boy racer pulling handbrake turns in a car with a "Baby On Board" sticker dangling around in the back window.
bulldog5046 said:well thats enough arguing, lets all goto the pub and get pissed
Alex B said:i think half of the time people dont even know what the gas signs meen, my girlfriend certainly doesnt lol and they dont mention it in your test/theory. and im sure alot of drivers never even look at the highway code.
Stuart DemonD said:Wow
I have just come back from a really tough audit over in Leamington, having a beer, about to order a chinese, and then started to read this....
Actually, I have only skimmed it as of now - one thing is certain, the BABY ON BOARD sticker we used to have was actually purchased when we had a Citreon ZX/Mondeo - not an MPV in sight. BUT we didn't use it on the Ulysse because it was unable to be read from the outside.
We purchased an MPV for one reason - we wanted to transport our 2 children in comfort, plus Jules could run it as a business vehicle for child-minding. So what if we bought an MPV? I could have easily purchased an estate, a 4x4, or whatever - but we decided the MPV fitted our needs. Peoples' tastes and needs are different, don't judge others because they don't suit yours