Expensive clutch?

Currently reading:
Expensive clutch?

Joined
Oct 1, 2017
Messages
7,315
Points
2,293
Location
Edinburgh Scotland
Anyone who's read some of my posts will know one of the motorized sports I'm interested in is Drag Racing. The most powerful engines produce ridiculous amounts of horsepower (11,000 Hp or more, anyone?) which all has to be controlled in a usable way and applied to the rear wheels. To do this they use multiplate centrifugal clutches like you've never seen before - A bit like the clutch from one of the old british bikes I sometimes mess about with, only much more massive.

Just in case anyone is interested enough here's a video about them: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpFyEW3aJu0 Did you get that the friction plates only last one to three runs? and I thought the Panda clutch had been an expense!
 
I watch a series on YouTube where a guy is building a bush plane. Obviously he is a very skilled engineer and he was designing the spars for the wings. Just posted a video where he had only needed 3 wing spars which he employed an engineering firm to make custom from extruded aluminium so highly specialised processes for custom parts.

Only needed 3 lengths which but due to a minimum order quantity had to buy 30. So spent a whole video testing the spars by bending a load on a jig to see how they would fail.

Outcome was they failed exactly as software predicted. Now has a pile of very expensive bent metal to throw away
 
My brother in law was a pilot (I say was because he passed on a couple of years ago - nothing to do with flying.) He was in coastal command (Liberators) during the war and flew the Berlin air lift and lot's of other exciting stuff in Africa and the Middle East before becoming a civil airline pilot with BEA and then Cyprus Airways. He had two mantras he would often repeat to me. One was "If you're going to fly long distance over water you need at least 3 and preferably 4 engines" the other was, after hearing I'd been up flying with my son in law in his wee single engined monoplane, "Just don't fly in anything small or with less than one engine - Bloody death traps!"
 
A friend and work mate was killed in the early 1990s when his Cessna "spam can" engine failed. He was on the way to Silverstone for the F1 meeting. It turns out the exhaust valves stuck. What made it even more serious was the problem had happened before and the cylinder head had recently been professionally stripped and effectively blueprinted. We are still using 1940s engine technology, because the costs of homologating anything "better" make new engines near on impossible to achieve.
 
A friend and work mate was killed in the early 1990s when his Cessna "spam can" engine failed. He was on the way to Silverstone for the F1 meeting. It turns out the exhaust valves stuck. What made it even more serious was the problem had happened before and the cylinder head had recently been professionally stripped and effectively blueprinted. We are still using 1940s engine technology, because the costs of homologating anything "better" make new engines near on impossible to achieve.

Arguably the engine technology you’re talking about as found in even more recent Cessnas and many of the new generation of General aviation planes, dates from the 1930s which developed from even older 4 cylinder air cooled horizontally opposed engines found in planes in the 20s.

There are 2 reasons they don’t get updated.

1 is that lycoming and continental more or less completely dominate the general aviation engine world and so there is little competition and therefore little need to update or develop the engines any further, they are stupidly reliable and so under stressed they rarely have problems, also they’re reputations means that all some people will want.

2nd is that there are little in the way of restrictions in aviation in terms of emissions, the emphasis is on reliability and safety so there is no need to develop an engine for fuel economy and emissions like there is with automotive engines.

Some people take a Subaru engine and convert it for aviation use, the 2.0 litre Boxer engine comes with something like 150hp in a standard non turbo form, where as a lycoming 0-360 found in something like a Cessna 172, is also about 150 - 180hp but with 3 times the displacement. Air cooled instead of water cooled, direct driven instead of using belts or chains, magnetos in place of coils. Modern engines are much more highly strung and less reliable.
These days you’re more likely to find someone converting a car engine for use in aircraft rather than develop a completely new aircraft engine.

One of my favourites which I really want to have a fly in in the Diamond DA62 which uses converted Mercedes A class (Austro) Diesel engines as least that has two so if one merc engine breaks it has a spare.
 
I'm not suggesting the engines should be powered up because as you say reliability is key. But for an engine to fail with stuck valves? That's unheard of in modern stuff. Cam belts, rods breaking, blah blah but stuck valves!!!
 
I'm not suggesting the engines should be powered up because as you say reliability is key. But for an engine to fail with stuck valves? That's unheard of in modern stuff. Cam belts, rods breaking, blah blah but stuck valves!!!

You are talking about nearly 30 years ago, and who know what sort of work an engine 30 years ago had or hadn’t had done to it.

As for flying, even with a stuck valve he should have maintained enough altitude to get himself down on the ground. Even with no engine the glide slope on any Cessna will carry you a very long way out of trouble, they don’t just fall to the ground when the engine stops. One of the first things you learn is picking a Landing spot in an emergency. As well as how to deal with a forced landing.

As for things that are eye wateringly expensive, I recently bought some Krytox oil for treating the seals on my cabriolet. The vw stuff is over £1300 a litre for oil. It’s a good job you only need a little drop
 
Last edited:
You are talking about nearly 30 years ago, and who know what sort of work an engine 30 years ago had or hadn’t had done to it.

As for flying, even with a stuck valve he should have maintained enough altitude to get himself down on the ground. Even with no engine the glide slope on any Cessna will carry you a very long way out of trouble, they don’t just fall to the ground when the engine stops. One of the first things you learn is picking a Landing spot in an emergency. As well as how to deal with a forced landing.

As for things that are eye wateringly expensive, I recently bought some Krytox oil for treating the seals on my cabriolet. The vw stuff is over £1300 a litre for oil. It’s a good job you only need a little drop

Yes it was long ago but even then stuck valves were unheard of on road vehicles. Of course his plane did not just fall from the sky Looney Tunes style, but he clearly hit something very hard or he'd have walked away.
 
Yes it was long ago but even then stuck valves were unheard of on road vehicles. Of course his plane did not just fall from the sky Looney Tunes style, but he clearly hit something very hard or he'd have walked away.

So what killed him was hitting something hard and not a stuck valve….

If you know the details it will all be somewhere on the CAA website
 
Back
Top