jasper
Member
Without wishing to re-hash old threads that have probably covered this issue before...I just wanted a debate about the bad press the Stilo has sometimes.
Case in point ...I picked up that new 'Test Drive' mag that's been advertised recently - I flicked to the back where there was the obligatory quick summary of all cars available. The Stilo scored three out of five stars with the 2.4 versions only getting two. The summary said "quite a stunner in 3door guise but Fiat seriously misjudged how quickly the small hatch market would move forward and you can't help think the Stilo is just there to make up the numbers?"
I agree the Stilo is not the car it should or could have been...but 2 stars? Bearing in mind they give the truly diabolical (but soon to be replaced by the apparently excellent C4) Xsara 2 stars also. So they're trying to say a well specced Abarth is no better a car than a base model 1.4 Xsara - I think that's a little harsh.
Also there's no consistency between mags...Top Gear have slammed the Stilo but in a recent special Buyers Guide Top Gear mag; they say the Abarth is an original and alternative hot hatch and other very complimentary things ..I remember Auto Express also rating the manual 2.4 highly.
I am being naive in thinking journalits don't get paid to say nice things about certain makes? Because I'm begining to suspect sometimes they do? (rant over just wanted to get it off my chest!)
Case in point ...I picked up that new 'Test Drive' mag that's been advertised recently - I flicked to the back where there was the obligatory quick summary of all cars available. The Stilo scored three out of five stars with the 2.4 versions only getting two. The summary said "quite a stunner in 3door guise but Fiat seriously misjudged how quickly the small hatch market would move forward and you can't help think the Stilo is just there to make up the numbers?"
I agree the Stilo is not the car it should or could have been...but 2 stars? Bearing in mind they give the truly diabolical (but soon to be replaced by the apparently excellent C4) Xsara 2 stars also. So they're trying to say a well specced Abarth is no better a car than a base model 1.4 Xsara - I think that's a little harsh.
Also there's no consistency between mags...Top Gear have slammed the Stilo but in a recent special Buyers Guide Top Gear mag; they say the Abarth is an original and alternative hot hatch and other very complimentary things ..I remember Auto Express also rating the manual 2.4 highly.
I am being naive in thinking journalits don't get paid to say nice things about certain makes? Because I'm begining to suspect sometimes they do? (rant over just wanted to get it off my chest!)