People who have seen some of my other posts will know I'm slowly hauling myself out of the "gravity well" with regard to automotive electronic diagnostics. Haven't even reached stage 1 separation yet though!
I have both VCDS and MES and what I've discovered is that being able to graph "stuff" is really useful. To a certain extent I can do this with both these scanners but the problem is because it feeds to you through the USB port it's quite restrictive (and also you are seeing what the car's ECU thinks it's seeing which may not actually be what's going on) It's much more useful to be able to directly connect to components, typically by back probing, so you know for sure what the trace on the screen relates to.
Because of this I'm very interested in Automotive oscilloscopes and I've been looking at the options for quite a while now. I like Laptop based systems and there are some almost affordable options obtainable from the far east but, without going into detail, there are problems to overcome if you go this route, not least of which is support for an electronic dinosaur like me. I think it's important for anyone interested to realize that, although you can use a more general purpose 'scope you would be well advised to buy a dedicated automotive one or you will spend lots of time trying to understand how to set up the X and Y axis values and maybe choosing attenuators etc. The dedicated item has presets and suggestions to solve this (probably has an inbuilt library of waveforms etc to help you too). I've also discovered it would seem to be best to avoid very cheap options as they are unlikely to give the resolution or sampling rate you need.
"Everybody" - including an acquaintance who has his own garage - seems to say the Pico just can't be beat. Trouble for me is I don't have, and couldn't justify spending, that sort of money. I'm very interested in the Foxwell OS 100 4 sold by our friends at Gendan £395 is pretty good but still a lot of money. When you look closely at it it looks like a Hantek? casing looks the same anyway? and it's the Hantek which you can buy direct from the east somewhat cheaper. I do read about configuration problems with these though, which I'm sure Gendan would help with if you bought their Foxwell version.
Now to the reason for this post. About a month or so ago - I don't think I posted at the time? - I came across a you tube video of someone playing around with one I hadn't come across - it's a DITEX - Here's their site: https://autoditex.com/
I think you are looking at around £600 to get set up so a big saving over the Pico and still out of my reach just now but I like the look of it. What might be of immediate interest to some of us though is the Library they've made available. I've spent hours in there and it's fascinating. Pico do the same and between the two there's an absolute wealth of info to be gained for ignorant newbies like me.
So, dive in, why don't you, but beware 'cos it's addictive.
regards
Jock
I have both VCDS and MES and what I've discovered is that being able to graph "stuff" is really useful. To a certain extent I can do this with both these scanners but the problem is because it feeds to you through the USB port it's quite restrictive (and also you are seeing what the car's ECU thinks it's seeing which may not actually be what's going on) It's much more useful to be able to directly connect to components, typically by back probing, so you know for sure what the trace on the screen relates to.
Because of this I'm very interested in Automotive oscilloscopes and I've been looking at the options for quite a while now. I like Laptop based systems and there are some almost affordable options obtainable from the far east but, without going into detail, there are problems to overcome if you go this route, not least of which is support for an electronic dinosaur like me. I think it's important for anyone interested to realize that, although you can use a more general purpose 'scope you would be well advised to buy a dedicated automotive one or you will spend lots of time trying to understand how to set up the X and Y axis values and maybe choosing attenuators etc. The dedicated item has presets and suggestions to solve this (probably has an inbuilt library of waveforms etc to help you too). I've also discovered it would seem to be best to avoid very cheap options as they are unlikely to give the resolution or sampling rate you need.
"Everybody" - including an acquaintance who has his own garage - seems to say the Pico just can't be beat. Trouble for me is I don't have, and couldn't justify spending, that sort of money. I'm very interested in the Foxwell OS 100 4 sold by our friends at Gendan £395 is pretty good but still a lot of money. When you look closely at it it looks like a Hantek? casing looks the same anyway? and it's the Hantek which you can buy direct from the east somewhat cheaper. I do read about configuration problems with these though, which I'm sure Gendan would help with if you bought their Foxwell version.
Now to the reason for this post. About a month or so ago - I don't think I posted at the time? - I came across a you tube video of someone playing around with one I hadn't come across - it's a DITEX - Here's their site: https://autoditex.com/
I think you are looking at around £600 to get set up so a big saving over the Pico and still out of my reach just now but I like the look of it. What might be of immediate interest to some of us though is the Library they've made available. I've spent hours in there and it's fascinating. Pico do the same and between the two there's an absolute wealth of info to be gained for ignorant newbies like me.
So, dive in, why don't you, but beware 'cos it's addictive.
regards
Jock