me53350
New member
what a pile of boll!cks.
do you have any skill or experience to back this up? how about you try this on your own car.
Why is this incorrect?
You obviously have no praticle experiance or skill.
what a pile of boll!cks.
do you have any skill or experience to back this up? how about you try this on your own car.
Why is this incorrect?
You obviously have no praticle experiance or skill.
Why is this incorrect?
You obviously have no praticle experiance or skill.
Why is this incorrect?
You obviously have no praticle experiance or skill.
are you a plonker on purpose?
I think it's funny.
I have 3 people telling me i am wrong and none of them cannot explain why!
27 years of what?
I don't want arguments just a discusion.
Thanks, Tom.
I think it's funny.
I have 3 people telling me i am wrong and none of them cannot explain why!
27 years of what?
I don't want arguments just a discusion.
Thanks, Tom.
That ratio is the stoichiometric ratio.
14.7 parts air to 1 part fuel.
This is for an efficient burn when the engine is at working temperature; when cold the ratio is more like 13.5 parts air to 1 part fuel.
Increasing the fuel part in the ratio will increase power to a certain extent. Yet too much fuel will decrease power therfore people only increase the amount fuel injected to certain point giving poor emisions.
if its a near standard engine with a standard map, maybe 80-85bhp?
Standard map but just had a big head skim, polished valves (stems and faces), has been ported and polished including inlet manifold, also it has the all important K&N air flilter lol ;
the in. manifold gasket is now restricting the flow as it's now slightly smaller than the ports and manifold.
I don't think anyone here is directly disputing that using resistors will have absolutely no effect on the car's performance. But what can undoubtedly be accepted is that it will completely cock up your engine. And that the gains will really be completely minimal considering the extra fuel wasted.