What would most put you off buying a car?

Currently reading:
What would most put you off buying a car?

What would most put you off buying a car?

  • Mileage

    Votes: 32 46.4%
  • Colour

    Votes: 15 21.7%
  • The owner

    Votes: 26 37.7%
  • lack of Service history

    Votes: 25 36.2%
  • no/short tax or MOT

    Votes: 24 34.8%
  • Large amount of previous owners

    Votes: 23 33.3%
  • model - e.g ELX

    Votes: 8 11.6%
  • Make - e.g Fiat

    Votes: 10 14.5%

  • Total voters
    69
Insurance - its not on the list but if they asked me to sit down before I got the quote then the car might not be coming home with me :p

Other than that its owner and make. I probably wouldn't buy a non-fiat currently. The owner must know about the car, I feel its better for him to tell me exactly what sort of oil hes used rather than a service sheet saying the oils been changed.
 
High number of owners doesn't mean much to me, my tipo had 6 or 7 previous owners and din't even start its life in this country... still running almost 4 years on (y)

If I had met the previous owner and they appeared to not have a clue then I probably wouldn't buy, also wouldn't buy if they tried to lie blatently about car specs.

Wouldn't buy a model of the car I didn't like e.g a normal civic as it looks nasty and would only accept the Type R but couldn't afford that anyway.

High Mileage (n)

No MOT Certs or Service History (n)

Not driving any Green, White, Brown or Pink cars :yuck:

MOT is not really a problem if I have the money to spend on repairs and I want it, Tax is not a problem for the same reason.

Cannot rule out manufacturer as anyone of them could be capable of making a car which makes me say ooooOOOOOOooooo.
 
Things to look for are frequent change of ownership [can show the car has problems], no obvious maintenance. Receipts and a service book mean nothing. both easily frauded. Look for work done. does it tally with the service receipts? If it has a stamp in the book, ring them up and check they know the car. If the car has say 70000 miles +, does the bonnet have stonechips? If not, why? An honest car will have them as well as a few dints and dents possibly. Is the mileage correct? Give the car a HPI check. Look at the interior, is it worn yet miles are low? Walk away if looking shabby. High miles is nothing on a petrol car today. As long as the servicing has been done, nothing to worry about. Indeed, in reality, a motorway car with 100000 miles is less worn then a 50000 miles town car!! Ask the owner what type of oil they use. If they dont know, then car has not been looked after. Ask general questions, like when were tyres and brakes done. A honest and enthusiastic owner will fall over themselves to tell you. These are the cars to buy. And last, if the car and owner dont go together, run a mile!!!!! (y) :)

Andy.
 
custard said:
Ford%20Badge.jpg


i dont know how any fiat owner can say anything about the blue oval. ford has been better since time began and still is. did the stilo compete with the focus? they arent even in the same class. did the mondeo struggle to steal sales from the marea, i think not. could the punto keep up with the fiesta & ka, well its not quite so convincingly ford this time but ford won fair and square by a big margin. and ford dont make a cinq/sei competitor because toy cars aren't ford's thing. the only fiat that beat ford was the coupe, and thats only because the cougar was a rush job. ford transits may be rusty but they rust on the roads while scudos are stuck in the mud at scrapyards. 90% of people will agree that ford make better cars than fiat, and the other 10% missed school too much. all i can say is s1 rst.
 
jug said:
i dont know how any fiat owner can say anything about the blue oval. ford has been better since time began and still is. did the stilo compete with the focus? they arent even in the same class. did the mondeo struggle to steal sales from the marea, i think not. could the punto keep up with the fiesta & ka, well its not quite so convincingly ford this time but ford won fair and square by a big margin. and ford dont make a cinq/sei competitor because toy cars aren't ford's thing. the only fiat that beat ford was the coupe, and thats only because the cougar was a rush job. ford transits may be rusty but they rust on the roads while scudos are stuck in the mud at scrapyards. 90% of people will agree that ford make better cars than fiat, and the other 10% missed school too much. all i can say is s1 rst.
I know a lot of people, Garage owners and drivers alike who would gladly take a Fiat over a Ford. The garage owners have owned both Fiats and Fords and the others have owned neither. but I think Fords Rep is worse then Fiats.

Although ford have sold more units it doesn't mean a thing, is like saying Sony and better then Sega and games and Consoles :rolleyes:

But like I said in my opionion of cars above somewhere, any manufacturer is capable of making me change my mind, The MK1 Focus was nice but then again so was the Stilo. The new Ford ASBO is nice but then again, so is the G-Punto :confused:
 
jug said:
i dont know how any fiat owner can say anything about the blue oval. ford has been better since time began and still is. did the stilo compete with the focus? they arent even in the same class. did the mondeo struggle to steal sales from the marea, i think not. could the punto keep up with the fiesta & ka, well its not quite so convincingly ford this time but ford won fair and square by a big margin. and ford dont make a cinq/sei competitor because toy cars aren't ford's thing. the only fiat that beat ford was the coupe, and thats only because the cougar was a rush job. ford transits may be rusty but they rust on the roads while scudos are stuck in the mud at scrapyards. 90% of people will agree that ford make better cars than fiat, and the other 10% missed school too much. all i can say is s1 rst.
what i found with ford is the build quality is shocking! new focus in the family, the door handles keep coming off, a scorripo? (sp? lol) the rear door handles keep coming off, the clocks broken, the air conditioning is broken and the remote locking doesnt work and makes endless amounts of creaking and banging and squeeking when driven, s reg focus, electric window doesnt work and air conditioning is broken, errr and my mates fiesta si, the door handles keep coming off, (these fords like to loose there door handles!) and the ash tray keeps falling off, oh and this is only what i have found from being in them, so theres obviously more!

all of the above are cared for so its not abuse.

now if i think about it, my sisters car, which has had endless abuse, its really bad, gets thrashed and trashed by sisters children, only thing wrong on interior side is that the bonnet release came off when her boy kicked it getting into the front, everything else is all very secure and nothing is broken. no squeeks or creaking.
 
High milage would put me of with either combination of lots of previous owners, especially if it's changed hands quickly in the recent past or an owner that doesn't have a clue... says he who bought a Mk1 Punto with a blown HG!
 
jug said:
i dont know how any fiat owner can say anything about the blue oval. ford has been better since time began and still is. did the stilo compete with the focus? they arent even in the same class. did the mondeo struggle to steal sales from the marea, i think not. could the punto keep up with the fiesta & ka, well its not quite so convincingly ford this time but ford won fair and square by a big margin.

Though Ford are technically owned by Ford USA, they are seen as a British car whereas Fiat are obviously Italian. Therefore a lot of people buy British in preference to foreign cars. Also, Ford has a much, much larger dealer base in the UK than Fiat, therefore there is much more opportunity to buy them due to availability when compared with Fiat.

And also remember that though Ford beats Fiat on UK sales, Fiat have trounced Ford in European sales with some of their models. Uno for instance was the best selling car in Europe for a number of years ;) And I'm fairly certain both the Cinquecento and Punto followed that up as best sellers in Europe too.

jug said:
and ford dont make a cinq/sei competitor because toy cars aren't ford's thing.

I think the Fiat Cinquecento is very firmly in the same 'super-mini' market category as the Ford Ka...

jug said:
the only fiat that beat ford was the coupe, and thats only because the cougar was a rush job. ford transits may be rusty but they rust on the roads while scudos are stuck in the mud at scrapyards. 90% of people will agree that ford make better cars than fiat, and the other 10% missed school too much.

Depends. In the 80's Ford made some shockingly bad cars. The Escorts and Fiestas of the time rusted to bits and had antiquated engines. The Sierra was ok to drive long distance but felt worn and tatty by 80k miles (not including the Cosworth here). Most of their models of that era weren't rated at all and were regularly beaten in road tests by just about every other manufacturer. It wasn't until the Mondeo of the early 90's did Ford finally make a well built car, and the then new range of Zetec engines finally brought them up to the standard of everyone else.

By the time the Focus was released Ford had really got their act together. The cars are very well assembled and most of the engines are good. Not only that but the cars are NICE TO DRIVE, something you couldn't say about an 80K 1980's Escort/ Sierra ('soggy' is an understatement!)

But there is more to a car than just being built well. Old Mercedes are built well but aren't exactly fun to drive. A Citroen AX GT is great to drive (when it stays in one piece!), but has shocking build quality. Don't ask how I know :bang:

I've owned and driven many Fords in the past. I loved my mk5 Cortina 2.0 litre Ghia, and in fact still own a mk3 Cortina 2000E with a 2.8 V6 conversion. Modern Transits are amazing to drive compared with older models, but then again, so are the vans from a lot of modern manufacturers..

I've also driven mk1, 2 and 3 Granadas, which were ok if a little tail happy. Mk3/4 Escorts were horrible, and mk2 Fiestas were dull (the XR2 and XR3 had no hope with competing with a Golf GTi/ Pug 205 GTi).

However, though I've owned and driven many Fords at the moment I'd be unlikely to buy another. Why? Simply because none of them appeal to me, with the exception of the top end performance Focus. I just don't like the way they look, which also applies to many cars of today - simple as that. But who knows, maybe a Ford will come out that I will lust after. Until then I'm sticking with what I've got. (y)

jug said:
all i can say is s1 rst.

I'm not sure if you mean it is good or bad? S1 RST was a horrible car in my opinion. Sorry. It was poorly built, unreliable, dreadful engine (CVH engines were bad enough N/A let alone turboed!), rusted like crazy, didn't handle well compared withe the opposition (Golf/ Pug/ R5 and Strada Abarth could run rings round it) though its straight line performance was ok. Very few left now, and that's hardly surprising.

All manufacturers have their good and bad points. Ford make good cars today, well built, finished and reliable. Fiat aren't as good, but in general are a lot cheaper. You get what you pay for, though a lot of Fiats are tough and will go on for miles even if they feel like they are about to fall to bits!

Swings and roundabouts I guess :chin:
 
jug said:
i dont know how any fiat owner can say anything about the blue oval. ford has been better since time began and still is. did the stilo compete with the focus? they arent even in the same class. did the mondeo struggle to steal sales from the marea, i think not. could the punto keep up with the fiesta & ka, well its not quite so convincingly ford this time but ford won fair and square by a big margin. and ford dont make a cinq/sei competitor because toy cars aren't ford's thing. the only fiat that beat ford was the coupe, and thats only because the cougar was a rush job. ford transits may be rusty but they rust on the roads while scudos are stuck in the mud at scrapyards. 90% of people will agree that ford make better cars than fiat, and the other 10% missed school too much. all i can say is s1 rst.

Think you missing the point, I chose a Fiat because it appeald to me more that Ford, mainly in the styling and shear 'fun' factors of say an equivalent Fiesta. No ones arguing that Fiat make technically better cars, but for some people, they just hit the spot.
 
yeh i aggree, fords are good cars, nobody's disputing that, it's what car is right for YOU and I happen to like fiats :D

is it just me or does the GP punto Look a bit like the MK1 focus? specially from the rear but not so much from the front
 
what kinda put me of buying my car was the stains on the seats... But then i figured, hey it must be a chick magnate. It looked like the car had seen more action than arnie... I can also confirm it true it works wonders wi the ladies. Just like its owner lol :p
 
Last edited:
Ford build pretty cars with pretty interiors. But the engineering is appaling. For example, Fiesta front bumpers are held on by big strong bolts. But the head bolts are crap and cheap!! Numerous Ka's are rusting around the inner wings for example. The engine in the Ka dates back its origin to 1955!! Early Zetec engines were rubbish, and always had tappet jacking issues and loads of ECU problems. Infact, the electronics on all Fords are plagued with ECU problems.
The vast amount of new Fords are company owned, and not private. I would like to see Ford private sales over 2 years say. These cars come on to the market, so there is a huge choice for buyers. Perhaps with the high dealer network, this is why people buy Fords.

Andy.
 
Back
Top