Technical Webasto sun roof

Currently reading:
Technical Webasto sun roof

babbo_umbro

Established member
Joined
Oct 17, 2007
Messages
2,146
Points
468
Location
Devon and Umbria
I've been looking into the subject of putting an after-market sun roof in my 4x4 TwinAir. Information to date goes as follows:

Webasto do list the new model Panda as suitable for their Hollandia 400 - which is a folding fabric roof, giving a much bigger open area than the alternative glass roofs.

The actual hole cut into the roof panel is still a lot bigger than the opening that you get in practice; there's quite a large overlap down each side and at the front, and the folded-up fabric occupies a fair bit of the opening at the back of the roof.

Webasto recommend fitting an additional stiffening bar to make up for the stiffness lost by removing most of the roof panel. This adds something approaching 200 pounds to the total cost.

There is a black plastic fairing that goes across the roof in front of the sun roof to reduce buffeting at higher speeds with the roof open. I was concerned about this either fouling the roof bars or coming so close to them that it might generate a lot of wind noise from the outer ends at all times. In fact this fairing is 88.5 cms long and the space between the roof bars is 102 cms at the front so I don't see this as a problem. (As a matter of interest, the bars are only 92 cms apart at the rear, so they converge where I would have guessed that they're parallel; I think this might well have generated a roar or whistle if the bars were only this far apart at the front.)

I've looked at a Hollandia 400 kit that Aurotrim in Ivybridge are waiting to put in a customer's car. Webasto have been around for over a hundred years, and their products have TUV approval - German type approval - and I must say that it looks like a thoroughly-engineered piece of kit, though slightly dauntingly complex. It comes with a 3-year warranty if fitted by an authorised dealer.

There's a massive grommet (not to mention a substantial Wallace) that fits into the roof opening and has two slots running round it - one to take the edge of the original roof panel and the other to take the edge of what remains of the original headlining. This is cream/beige, the inner lining is the same, and the outside fabric is black; as my Panda's Tuscan Green I think it would look fine from outside (and in).

There's a switch console, that fits above the windscreen at the front of the roof, it also contains the motor for folding and closing the roof, and I'm not quite sure how this would marry up to the stepped headlining round the interior lights and switches. Autotrim are confident that they can integrate it into the Panda's bus-based electrical system with no problems.

Total cost, including the additional stiffening kit, which I consider essential - is 1070 pounds plus VAT - 1284 pounds. Fitting takes a day - drop the car off first thing and collect it late in the afternoon.

I'm still very tempted and will make decision in the next couple of days.
 
i'd rather keep the strength of a solid roof especially if you have aircon. no point in a full sunroof unless you are using the car as a pride float or to carry home a large xmas tree. pride float seems to be the main reason for having holes in panda roofs.
 

Attachments

  • 1.JPG
    1.JPG
    79.7 KB · Views: 65
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    74.2 KB · Views: 81
  • 4.jpg
    4.jpg
    10.8 KB · Views: 66
  • 11.jpg
    11.jpg
    97.5 KB · Views: 70
  • 22.JPG
    22.JPG
    53.3 KB · Views: 67
  • 33.JPG
    33.JPG
    115.8 KB · Views: 72
  • 88.jpg
    88.jpg
    80.1 KB · Views: 72
Well - a thread in the Series 3 Panda section had edged me towards going for the sun roof - although the opening still seems short for the length of hole you have to cut in the roof panel - but it also prompted me to do some more careful measuring from inside the car. The major drawback seems to be that the aperture, and the frame round it, would interfere with the sculpting on the headlining, round the grab handle on the passenger side, and the hollow for it where there would be one on a LHD car (if you see what I mean), making it very hard to make a neat job. I'll do some more measuring tomorrow but, for the moment, it looks like a no-goer.
 
Well - a thread in the Series 3 Panda section had edged me towards going for the sun roof - although the opening still seems short for the length of hole you have to cut in the roof panel - but it also prompted me to do some more careful measuring from inside the car. The major drawback seems to be that the aperture, and the frame round it, would interfere with the sculpting on the headlining, round the grab handle on the passenger side, and the hollow for it where there would be one on a LHD car (if you see what I mean), making it very hard to make a neat job. I'll do some more measuring tomorrow but, for the moment, it looks like a no-goer.

Hi. I was wondering if u had any more thoughts about the viability of this? If the 400 is not a go-er then I don't think I'll bother as the glass ones are not really worth the effort.... :)
 
Hi. I was wondering if u had any more thoughts about the viability of this? If the 400 is not a go-er then I don't think I'll bother as the glass ones are not really worth the effort.... :)

I just don't see how it could be fitted neatly inside given the shape of the headlining and the width of the aperture, plus the shaping round the interior light and its switches. I agree totally that the 400 - the folding fabric model - is the only one that would be worthwhile.
 
I just don't see how it could be fitted neatly inside given the shape of the headlining and the width of the aperture, plus the shaping round the interior light and its switches. I agree totally that the 400 - the folding fabric model - is the only one that would be worthwhile.

What a shame. I would really liked to have had it done....oh well 1500 quid saved! LoL
 
Back
Top