Here is the two vehicles side by side.

Mito Vehicle Summary Performance & Economy

Fuel consumption (urban) 36.7 mpg
Fuel consumption (extra urban) 58.9 mpg
Fuel consumption (combined) 47.9 mpg
0 - 62 mph 11.2 seconds
Top speed 112 mph
Cylinders 4
Valves 16 v
Engine power 95 bhp
Engine torque 92 lbs/ft
Dry weight 1080 kgs


Bravo Vehicle Summary Performance & Economy

Fuel consumption (urban) 40.9 mpg
Fuel consumption (extra urban) 65.7 mpg
Fuel consumption (combined) 53.3 mpg
0 - 62 mph 10.5 seconds
Top speed 120 mph
Cylinders 4
Valves 8 v
Engine power 120 bhp
Engine torque 188 lbs/ft
Dry weight 1368 kgs

Will the performance of the Mito feel dreadful compared to the Bravo? Bear in mind i don't rag my Bravo, not by any means, I like a smooth drive and I usually drive with economy in mind.

What do you all think?

Info's from Autotrader.

Thanks.

FiatFan2012 said:

My wife is fed up or hearing about it!!

Click to expand...

As long as it's a 'nice' colour she won't mind what car you get

(Ypsilon range needs a bigger engine version in it's range, 1.4 Tjet or 1.6 diesel)

Indeed T14086 indeed...

Im right in saying it will have substantially more performance than the 500's 69hp 1.2 though? Aren't I...?

The new Panda is pretty cool, go have a look. Lots more space inside than a 500.

The Y is ugly.

Then again, you can always go for a Qubo as long as you spring for the 95 HP Multijet.

FiatFan2012 said:

Im right in saying it will have substantially more performance than the 500's 69hp 1.2 though? Aren't I...?

Click to expand...

The extra weight of the Ypsilon brings it closer than you would think.