Multiecuscan guide?

Currently reading:
Multiecuscan guide?

Joined
Oct 1, 2017
Messages
7,312
Points
2,292
Location
Edinburgh Scotland
'Mornin all.

Just a wee thought passing through that vacuous space that serves for my brain:-

I've been registered for about a month now and, although I've been messing about with small Fiats for many years, I've only just bought my own copy of Multiecuscan and I'm finding it quite difficult to get my head round it. As some of you may have seen from my post in the "Punto 2012 onwards" section, I'm waiting on a set of timing tools to arrive for my boy's 2012 Punto 1.4 (8 valve engine) and then I'll be doing a timing belt and "big" service. On completion of the service the ECU needs to have its service reminder reset using MES. There are You Tube guides on how to do this and it looks simple enough to do. Following replacement of the timing belt a Phonic Wheel Relearn may be needed to teach the ECU the new relative angular positions of the crank and cam sensors to each other (if I've understood correctly) I've not so far found a definitive step by step guide as to how to do this so if it proves necessary I'll just have to "blunder" around with my MES ( to be honest I'll probably rather enjoy this, as long as I don't render my boy's car undriveable! )

So what I'm wondering is, wouldn't it be a good idea to have a section solely devoted to Multiecuscan use. With a top section (I think you call them "stickies" ?) Which lists, in guide form, step by step, the common proceedures for which MES is used. ie. Service resets, Phonic wheel relearn (I believe this is a proceedure used in ABS as well?) Component activation etc etc. It would be useful also to have any pitfalls listed. For instance, I believe you can increase but not decrease (understandably) the mileage record.

Having browsed around the site for a few months now it's obvious that there are some very knowledgeable people on here and I'm so greatful for the advice and info freely given to me so far. A lot of you obviously use MES and have a great depth of understanding of it which, in a section such as this I'm proposing, could pass it on to the rest of us and particularly those, like me, struggling at first use!

Again, many thanks to those who have helped me recently. I'll update my entry on the Punto cam belt after I've stuffed the valves through the pistons!!!
Regards
Jock
 
Thanks for replying. Yes I found the site when I registered my copy of MES.

As you say - Too much reading! Maybe I need to persevere! The biggest problem I find is "translating" what people are writing about? Quite a number of the posts I've looked at are difficult to understand because they have been submitted by someone who is, I guess, probably not someone who is a native English speaker. I must have missed the guide though, or is that the one you can download as a PDF? If so then I do have it but there's nothing in it about Phonic Wheels that I can see?
 
Not read specifics...

Have you used the demo button on mes..

'Simulate' will show you SOME of what is required
Ooh, Demo button? Haven't noticed that yet. Was going to have a play with the simulate button this evening after we've handed our granddaughter back and I can concentrate. I think it works by me selecting the vehicle make and model then instead of clicking on "connect" or "scan" etc I click on "simulate"? I'm hoping that when I've finished I just click "disconnect" to take me back to a "home" screen? It doesn't lock into the simulation mode in some way, perhaps requiring a proceedure to be performed to exit simulation mode?

You can see how little I know! I'd be distraught if I found myself locked into simulate mode when I try it on my boy's Punto for the first time next weekend.

Thanks for the advice.
 
Ooh, Demo button? Haven't noticed that yet. Was going to have a play with the simulate button this evening after we've handed our granddaughter back and I can concentrate. I think it works by me selecting the vehicle make and model then instead of clicking on "connect" or "scan" etc I click on "simulate"? I'm hoping that when I've finished I just click "disconnect" to take me back to a "home" screen? It doesn't lock into the simulation mode in some way, perhaps requiring a proceedure to be performed to exit simulation mode?

You can see how little I know! I'd be distraught if I found myself locked into simulate mode when I try it on my boy's Punto for the first time next weekend.

Thanks for the advice.

Simulate = what I meant by demo,;)

just see a basic one..and get a "feel " for it (y)



I'm far from PC literate.. but get along ok with most of it..

unfortunately.. I've not used mine for almost a year..

so it's not exactly fresh in my mind
 
Simulate = what I meant by demo,;)

just see a basic one..and get a "feel " for it (y)



I'm far from PC literate.. but get along ok with most of it..

unfortunately.. I've not used mine for almost a year..

so it's not exactly fresh in my mind
Well, "best laid plans" and all that. Never got round to having a play with that simulate button. Delivered our granddaughter safely home (approx one hours journey across town) where No 2 son was about to leave for work. He runs an '07 plate 1.6 twin port Astra (VVT cam pulleys) and, as he started it up, clack, clack, clack for about 5 to 10 seconds from the variator pulleys! How long's it been doing that then? Oh, just a wee while Dad, only does it if it's been standing a day or two without starting though which is why I've never picked up on it when they've been visiting us! Now have to decide is it worth doing pulleys and solenoid valves, (never worked on VVT pulleys in my life), plus cambelt of course, on an old car with well over 100,000 miles on the clock? Then, as we are driving away, wife's phone rings. It's No1 son. Can we call round and pick up grandson's Christmas present as they've nowhere to hide it and they're worried he's going to find it! So, 1/2 hour diversion, then back across the city to home. Just time for some home made leek and potato soul with a roll and off to bed! Maybe I'll get time tonight with that simulate button! Probably time I abandoned this thread now as I just realised There's not much about MES in the above ramblings. - Sorry.
 
No issue. Just had the same for my supper..

VVT.. clatter on for a while before failing.. either px..as quiet whilst there..

Or just run til it breaks..

Could leave you stranded though..

There are many MES threads on here.. just get some practice with the demo.. and basic parameter operations.. then post on a relevant older thread.
Charlie
 
Last edited:
No issue. Just had the same for my supper..

VVT.. clatter on for a while before failing.. either px..as quiet whilst there..

Or just run til it breaks..

Could leave you stranded though..

There are many MES threads on here.. just get some practice with the demo.. and basic parameter operations.. then post on a relevant older thread.
Charlie
Yum yum! I see my dear wife has invented a new soup - leak and potato soul? - Actually her lentil is even better! I'm so very grateful to have a wife who can cook!

Young Pete tells me the Astra has been doing the "clacking" for quite some time now but only rattles for a few seconds on cold start and isn't getting any worse. Autovaux actually do the bits quite cheaply, just a few hundred, but there are other small issues with the car too, not to mention the mileage. He is a self employed signwriter, specialises in vehicle wrapping, and uses the car (it's an estate) for business so he puts some miles on it. He really wants a van - standard size Transit type would do - We had thought of trading it in exchange as it only does it on cold starts but we both just feel that is unethical and dishonest - we like to sleep soundly at night! Never needed to buy a van before - they're expensive aren't they!

My intention is to keep updating the thread in the Punto 2012 section as I make progress with the cam belt and service I started there some weeks ago. Thanks Charlie for your input there. Nice to be able to call you Charlie too instead of Varesecrazy. Does it have a meaning? Mine just means tired, worn out, half daft, old Jock!
 
hello how did it work out for you
Regarding the Astra's VVT pulleys. We decided to do nothing about them as he was going to buy a new(er) vehicle, probably a van for his business. But his business income is very variable and he had a bit of a lean time for a while so neither repaired the car or bought a new vehicle. The Astra went on merrily clacking away! Then, about a year ago, it failed it's MOT on emissions!

I "fiddled" with it for a while trying to diagnose the problem with the generic scanner embedded in my VCDS program but was unable to identify a component which was obviously giving a poor or out of range reading - very frustrating. Then he landed a job doing fancy graphics on a large recreational vehicle which belongs to his local wee garage and the owner told him to bring the car in and he'd have a look at it. He diagnosed the worn VVT pulleys being the cause. I was very dubious about this but he said he'd seen it before and it's the drift in valve timing which causes the problem - I remained very sceptical but my son asked him for a quote to fix it. The parts were a considerable cost but they agreed to come to an "arrangement" over the labour by offsetting it against the graphics work on the RV. At home that night I remembered about Autovaux from when I had my Astra SRI estate so looked up the parts cost on their site and the saving was massive so I immediately rang the chap up and asked if I could supply the parts. He doubted if I could buy them more cheaply but when I told him the price he was amazed and said "fine, just you go ahead". In the end the whole job cost about £250, maybe £300, all in compared to somewhere around £800 at our local Vauxhall independent. The car passed it's MOT - much to my surprise as I was sure it was a sensor problem - and is running better than it has in years!

Then there's my experiences with Multiecuscan (MES). Charlie, I just love your post above, I chuckled over it for quite a while - wish I'd known about the cream! It was the "fear" that I would need to do Phonic Wheel Relearns on both our Panda and my boy's Punto after replacing their cam belts and that I couldn't do a Service Reminder Reset on the Fiats by pushing dashboard buttons, coupled to the fact that I'd had VCDS (called Vag-Com when I bought it) for my VAG vehicles (SEAT and Skoda) for a few years so knew how handy a manufacturer specific scanner could be. The VCDS program came to me (from Ilexa) on a disc which I just had to stick into my laptop drive and run it. There was no complicated setup and it worked as soon as I plugged the interface cable into the car's diagnostic port. So MES was a bit of a shock as it had to be downloaded from the internet (I'm very poor with "computery stuff").

I spent quite a while deciding which interface package to go with and contacted Gendan (Their Grant is wonderfully helpful and very patient with "silly old codgers" like me) for advice more than once. After agonizing for some time I went with the Multiplex version mainly because it's very similar to the concept behind my VCDS where you just plug in one interface and then have access to all controllers. It was expensive, but I now know that, for me, it was the right decision.

Although downloading the program from the internet had "frightened" me, I actually managed it without any dramas at all and, as Charlie - and others - suggested at the time, I played around with the Simulate function whilst waiting for the interface to arrive from Gendan. Anyone considering buying MES should just download the program (it's free) and play around with the simulate function.

When the interface arrived I thought I could just plug it in and use it - like the VCDS. Silly me! The computer has to be "taught" to "speak" to the interface! There are quite clear instructions as to how to do this included - assigning com port and Baud rates etc - but I was too thick to properly understand them or know how to access the settings on my computer where the changes needed to be made. I blundered around, on and off, for a couple of days, getting more and more frustrated and depressed, before I got it all set up right. Many many many thanks to all on here and Grant at Gendan who helped! In fact it wasn't very difficult, it was just my complete ignorance about computers which was the problem!

So here we are nearly 3 years later and how has it worked out? Well, First thing to say is that I'm so glad I bought from Gendan. The quality of the kit they supplied is first class and their Grant has been so helpful. Although I'd had my VCDS for a few years before buying the MES I'd not really had any serious fault finding to do on any of the VAG stuff in the family so only used it for service resets and other very simple stuff. Consequently There was very little by way of "transferable skills" I could employ with the MES - I was pretty much starting out from a very low point in terms of knowledge. However I've been interested in diagnostics for many years and have a number of deeply - maybe too deeply technical? - books on the subject so probably know enough to be "dangerous".

In my opinion MES is a wonderful and powerful tool. It gives you enough access to do most of the stuff a competent home mechanic might aspire to be doing without being "dangerous" like the VCDS which gives options that can land you in very deep doo doo indeed if you don't know exactly what you are doing. I can see now why what I was proposing at the top of this thread is not really practical because the options available differ greatly depending on the vehicle spec and controllers fitted to that specific vehicle. Much better I think to make specific requests for advice/help with your problem in the "TECH" section when and as you have need? Or try You Tube where there is a great deal of good, but also misleading, stuff to ponder over.

3 years ago firing up MES was like opening Pandora's box - full of wonderful stuff but all a complete mystery to me! Now I'm quite at ease using it to scan our cars before a service to look for stored fault codes (always do this, then, if anything shows up wrong after you've been working on the vehicle you know it was something you did that caused it!) Being able to activate components is also very useful and I'm a particular fan of graphing sensor outputs when looking for faults. You can often find something which is "misbehaving" but not throwing a code by doing this. I have an ongoing conversation going with Grant at Gendan. At present we are discussing how MES presents Fuel trims for the Marelli controllers. Unlike the Bosch stuff Marelli don't seem to call them "Fuel Trims"? I'm also getting into testing MAP sensors. 3 years ago I wouldn't have known a fuel trim from a jam tart!

I never, so far, have had to use the Phonic Wheel Relearn! If you're interested you can read a lot more on this in the posts I did on Becky's Timing Belt. - enter Becky's timing belt in the search bar - but I've done a whole mass of other stuff with it all assisted by advice from folk on our forum and with the help boxes in the program itself. The only thing which would "frighten" me is the Proxy alignment because it warns you to record your present settings before proceeding. With VCDS when a recommendation like this is made it's like a secret warning that if you do it wrong you're going to be in very deep doo doo. So, just play around with it and, especially, take a look at the graphed outputs from the sensors whilst it's all running well. Then, if she's not running so good, you can do some comparing and often see, pretty quickly, that something is not giving the expected output. Oh, and don't buy bargain or "universal fitting" electronic components. Always buy big names from reliable sources and remember there's a very big market in counterfeit parts these days so be careful about on line purchases.

I'm very friendly with a number of my local small garages and from advice I've gleaned from them I think it's worth mentioning that actual ECUs seem to be pretty robust unless you do something really silly to them so suspecting that an ECU is faulty should be your last stop (there are a number of concerns who will check it out for you quite cheaply and repair if needed, often substituting uprated more robust components for known weak ones) But by far one of the most common things you will come across is either a break in a wire - can be an absolute sod to track down - or a poor or damaged connection in a plug connector. So don't assume that if you're getting a fault code for, say, an oxygen sensor all you need to do is fit a new one! (I picked this example because it's not unusual to find a broken wire to it's heater circuit) Always look, very carefully, at the male and female halves of the connector for physical damage and corrosion and I also like to give them a light coating of dielectric grease - I use Contalube 770 - when reassembling.

I'll stop at that, could go on and on and on though. If you're inclined to get MES and can afford it, then I can thoroughly recommend it. You then need to "play" with it until you understand what you are doing. The more you play the more you'll learn and with MES it's very difficult to do anything which will ruin anything - might be possible if you try very hard though!

I'd be very interested indeed to hear of other people's experience and opinion of MES so please do post if you can be bothered.
 
Well as an original/first/beta tester of FES (Fiat ECU Scan) before it became MES and the MES Forum moderator etc. then I can confirm several good and not so good things about MES.

Good
-----
1) If you have decent/proven hardware (costs more) then basically it just works
2) Vehicle and system support is pretty good considering the low cost

Could Do Better
---------------
3) Some information, explanations, procedures are a little lacking or cryptic. One bit example of this is the key programming instructions
4) Developer's forum support far lower than it used to be

All in all for use Fiat owners then it will have to be either MES or AlfaOBD.

Now this may amuse some but when I got my car serviced just before the warranty expired I asked if the diagnostic "Oil Reset Change" (petrol engine!) had been done as well as the "Service Reset". I was surprise to find that then the latest Fiat Witech & software did not have this function yet MES did.

Just had a full 5 year service and my specialist remembered our last exchange and confirmed to me that now Fiat/Witech do support the Oil change Reset for petrol engined cars. This reset reset the engines "learning data" for the UniAir/MultiAir system. Has nothing to do with DPFs.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for that. I don't own one of these engines so it doesn't affect me but it's very interesting to know of this. If you don't do this reset what happens?

Its going to feel like your carbs are out of balance..

They are 'clean' petrol engines.. so no filtration for soot and junk

Jag have bought the tech to get the emissions down on their big petrol motors

Should save a few hundred quid a year in VED..
 
Thanks for that. I don't own one of these engines so it doesn't affect me but it's very interesting to know of this. If you don't do this reset what happens?

To be honest I have no idea what happens if this is not done.

On 5 year cam belt change apparently the latest (if not earlier) Fiat Witech has a reset sequence for a cam belt change. Supposedly to learn the new "edge" timings etc. to maximise engine ECU performance/control etc.

I could speculate that a lot of these modern reset procedures are "icing on the cake" and therefore not critical or essential but are best done if able to be done.

This lack of "detailed information/knowledge" from manufacturers is one of the biggest issues/beefs/etc one could currently levy at them. All smacks of "plug in", "hit the tit" (sorry no offence meant) and "don't ask questions".

All very puzzling even if you know about these things.
 
Well as an original/first/beta tester of FES (Fiat ECU Scan) before it became MES and the MES Forum moderator etc.

That's very interesting s130. Might I presume then that you are quite an expert in it's use? Please don't worry, I'm not trying to score any points here or trying to cause embarrassment to you by trying to "trip you up" but I could do with help from someone who "really knows"

The problem I'm trying to isolate is that ever since we bought Becky (2010 Panda 1.2 Dynamic Eco 60hp engine) she's had a slight reluctance to pull cleanly at large throttle openings - doesn't make much difference whether revs are low or mid range (I haven't really tried revving the nuts off her.) and she pulls absolutely fine if you only ask her to accelerate gently. You couldn't call it a miss fire, it's much more subtle than that. Mrs J doesn't feel it at all but she is notoriously insensitive regarding cars. It's probably best described as a "holding back". It reminds me very much of the way the SU carb with the swinging needle affected performance when the needle got worn down near it's base due to rubbing in the jet. You would find the engine running rich when checked so by screwing the jet up and weakening the mixture you could get a good idle reading and the engine would tick over beautifully. However when the engine speeded up and the needle started to rise in the jet, it would now be on an unworn part of the needle so, as the jet had been wound up to compensate for the needle wear at idle, the mixture would now be weak so you would get hesitation and a very similar "holding back" when a power mixture was required.

I've been looking at all the parameters on MES and haven't seen anything definitively wrong - although I have some suspicions regarding the MAP. I'd really like to be able to look at the short and long term fuel trims like I can on the VAG stuff using my VCDS and even on other makes using the generic OBD reader which is part of VCDS (It won't "speak" to the Fiats unfortunately) but I can't find any reference to Fuel trims in the menus. Grant and I have been having some interesting conversations about it but haven't yet really reached a final conclusion.

So can I ask you if you know if I can view fuel trims in MES? Maybe they don't call them fuel trims? I'm thinking of something called "learned values" - can't quite remember the exact name though.

Any light you can cast on this, or if you are aware of others who have suffered this hesitancy (which is almost undetectable when in open loop by the way) and sorted it would be very gratefully received. By the way I've looked at hoses and tried to find manifold vacuum leaks etc. Must make myself a smoke tester - I see lots of instructions on you tube for making a DIY version.

Kindest regards
Jock
 
Last edited:
PS to the above:

The two Parameter values I was thinking of which i mentioned above are the "Lambda Sensor Integrator" which I think just might be a short term fuel trim? and the "Mixture Correction Learning Value" which I think just might be the long term fuel trim? I'm very unsure though so wonder if you know specifically what these values refer to?

Again many thanks if you can cast any light on any of this.
 
That's very interesting s130. Might I presume then that you are quite an expert in it's use? Please don't worry, I'm not trying to score any points here or trying to cause embarrassment to you by trying to "trip you up" but I could do with help from someone who "really knows"

The problem I'm trying to isolate is that ever since we bought Becky (2010 Panda 1.2 Dynamic Eco 60hp engine) she's had a slight reluctance to pull cleanly at large throttle openings - doesn't make much difference whether revs are low or mid range (I haven't really tried revving the nuts off her.) and she pulls absolutely fine if you only ask her to accelerate gently. You couldn't call it a miss fire, it's much more subtle than that. Mrs J doesn't feel it at all but she is notoriously insensitive regarding cars. It's probably best described as a "holding back". It reminds me very much of the way the SU carb with the swinging needle affected performance when the needle got worn down near it's base due to rubbing in the jet. You would find the engine running rich when checked so by screwing the jet up and weakening the mixture you could get a good idle reading and the engine would tick over beautifully. However when the engine speeded up and the needle started to rise in the jet, it would now be on an unworn part of the needle so, as the jet had been wound up to compensate for the needle wear at idle, the mixture would now be weak so you would get hesitation and a very similar "holding back" when a power mixture was required.

I've been looking at all the parameters on MES and haven't seen anything definitively wrong - although I have some suspicions regarding the MAP. I'd really like to be able to look at the short and long term fuel trims like I can on the VAG stuff using my VCDS and even on other makes using the generic OBD reader which is part of VCDS (It won't "speak" to the Fiats unfortunately) but I can't find any reference to Fuel trims in the menus. Grant and I have been having some interesting conversations about it but haven't yet really reached a final conclusion.

So can I ask you if you know if I can view fuel trims in MES? Maybe they don't call them fuel trims? I'm thinking of something called "learned values" - can't quite remember the exact name though.

Any light you can cast on this, or if you are aware of others who have suffered this hesitancy (which is almost undetectable when in open loop by the way) and sorted it would be very gratefully received. By the way I've looked at hoses and tried to find manifold vacuum leaks etc. Must make myself a smoke tester - I see lots of instructions on you tube for making a DIY version.

Kindest regards
Jock

Hi Jock

I have to say that I'm not "quite an expert in it's use". This is because I've not had to diagnose and route out a problem in any detail. My cars (past/present) have only thrown firm errors which MES is good at picking up errors and showing secondary data associated data at the time of the fault (eg. time/temp/rpm/etc/...)

When it comes to no fault code diagnosis then my experience is limited and I would fall back on "prior old school thoughts/experience".

Regarding you mention "reluctance" then if this has always been that way then I would be pondering "normal" factory settings. Example: My 500X has a Sport Mode and Auto Mode setting. The Auto Mode is lethargic but does deliver when fully floored. The Sport Mode is lively (too lively for some) so at low pedal settings (compared to Auto Mode) that car is a real lively beast. However at higher "pedal" positions (note pedal position does not map linearly map to throttle position) performance tails off due to the non linearity of the pedal to throttle plate mapping.

In Sport Mode the pedal position to throttle opening is very much a steep exponential curve. In Auto mode I performs like a reverse exponential curve. All one can say is that the two curves only cross at idle and max RPM.

I've just looked in MES and I'm a little confused (not owning a Panda) about what MES has for 2010 models, Natural Power? No fuel trim values that I can see but regarding "learning" there are several "adjustments" that can be performed. However if i were you I would want for know the full relevant history of the vehicle before delving into "adjustments".

You mention running "open loop" appears to be OK. This would suggest to me that basically the system is sound (i.e. no air leaks, lack of compression, etc) and the ECU is responding/operating on delivered sensor information and/or out of adjustment values.

I'll hold my hand up very high and say that what I've posted is probably no different or an enhancement on what you have already concluded but is still a little confirmation of your/our current think.

MES is able to graph all "measurement" values. So one could go back to real basics and graph some values. Engine power is basically dictated by fuel delivery, air intake, temperature and other similar factors. Take a look at the list of parameters that MES has to offer and rule out immediate "not relevant" ones (A/C Compressor, Odometer, Universal Code, etc.

Sorry not an ideal response but hopefully an encouraging one?
 
Sorry not an ideal response but hopefully an encouraging one?

Thanks for responding and yes, very encouraging. I'm actually getting enormous enjoyment and learning a lot as I go trying to get to the bottom of all this. Becky, although actually in quite good condition, is a bit of a project "toy" for me. I get to fiddle and mess around with her without having to worry too much about disabling her because Mrs J can always use my Ibiza if she needs to.

I've read other posts on our forum from people who talk about similar effects (more with the 69hp VVT engine though) so you may well be right that it's actually a "standard feature" and could be linked in some way to emissions compliance? Becky is a Dynamic Eco (£30 road tax) and from all I've been able to find out they managed to get her into that tax band by doing a factory fill of very "thin" oil, using low rolling resistance tyres etc. I've not seen anywhere that they "tweeked" the actual engine settings to achieve this, as far as I know it's just the same 60 hp engine that was used in earlier versions. But I find myself "wondering".

Anyway, I'm having a lovely time "tinkering", learning a lot about using MES as I do it and having some very interesting conversations with Grant at Gendan who is very keen to know how things turn out. If I find out anything concrete which might be of interest I'll make a post about it in the "Tech" section - but don't hold your breath will you.

Thanks again
Jock
 
Back
Top