Re: Opinions on website (from normal people, not geeks)
all i see is this
all i see is this
@Mig: just wondering are you in the business? as i've said already internet development is a major part of my course..we are doing basic stuff at the moment as it's first year. doing htm and css and all that. Found it very boring at the start but it's getting interest now that we are able to script proper websites. just wondering if you have just done scripting or have you done any software coding? Another module of the course is programming..doing VB6 at the mo and I hate it!! just wondering if you are in the business and if so whats it like? a bit of career guidance!!!
I also understand your frustration with programmes like dreamweaver and the like!!
yeah, but he has made a website to display his pictures.. not launch a career in IT!
i fully understand what is being said about web standards, had it drummed into my head enough at uni - and yea i agree every site should pass w3c validation, but surely all this ranting should be targetting at the people behind Dreamweaver, not Chris!!
i'm doing business information systems..its a bit boader than just IT..the main modules are system and business analysis..sofware programming..web development along with all the business side of things..like management and financial accounting..economics..business stats..marketing..psycology etc. The prospects over here for highly skilled graduates seem much better. The course covers almost every aspect of business. we already had Deloitte poaching..they came in and gave us a presentation..like 3months into the course!
i've not changed my mind
i was looking at the site for what it is, and what is going to be used for. then the thread shifted toward web standards etc which are important, but i then brought it back to what the site is meant to be used for and the reasoning behind why the coding is not going to be validated.
Have to say I am amazed at some of the comments here. Bloke puts up a link to a website for comments. Someone says looks nice & clean. A purist comes on and makes a comment about standards and now the first bloke changes his mind!!
Reminds me of a program I saw recently where these so called critics at an art exhibition waxed lyrical about style, feeling, expression around some paintings.Turned out they had been painted by an elephant.
Everyone's an expert it seems. Anyway, I may be on here a lot less as I will be checking the html on every site I go to.
I am also a purist, but as I was doing a million and one other things I didnt run the code through the validator when I first looked, which is something I would do to any site that I had been asked to comment on normally. Anyway, think of me what you will, I really dont care much for personal opinions on me of someone the other end of a computer.
I just validated www.fiatforum.com and found errors.
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.fiatforum.com
So goodbye all :wave:
So now you are saying it is ok if it is NOT validated?! :bang:Forums will (pretty much) never validate because the code is generated by a piece of software
So now you are saying it is ok if it is NOT validated?! :bang:
Who is passing judgement?I wish people who don't understand these things wouldn't pass judgement!
I wish people who don't understand these things wouldn't pass judgement!