General Avoid the GP like the plague!

Currently reading:
General Avoid the GP like the plague!

Uno is still going strong in Brazil :) http://uno.fiat.com.br/

fiat-uno-brazil-2012.jpg


Not a patch on the old Uno
 
First I will start by saying I've never driven anything but a basic spec gp. But 6 years ago just after my mk1 punto had gone the swift went in for a recall I got given 1.2 active punto of the same age and roughly at the same time cost of my swift. This is still despite plundering fiat and suzukis back catalogue for courtesy cars before and since one of the worst cars I have driven. It just got all the basics wrong. In spirit it should have been like a 55s, making up for the lack of pace with lots of revs and cornering on the door handles, but it just wasn't, the controls saw to that, the steering was lifeless, the brakes were either on or off and it didn't matter how hard you revved it it didn't go.

At the time I was happy cos the car I had felt 10 years more advanced, but tbf my mk1 16v felt more advanced too so maybe the bottom spec ones are significantly worse than an average one.


Perhaps the 1.2s aren't so good. My t-jet certainly has some poke and the brakes are far from on/off. In fact I remember thinking on the test drive that they felt less 'servoed' than those on the 407 I was driving at the time. The steering is lifeless which is a shame but at least the weighting is consistent unlike a 207's which jumps all over the place.
 
Whether you like or agree with surveys they do act as a gauge of how well a manufacturer is (or is not!) doing.

From my perspective it seems the dealers are the issue,niche makes (lexus etc) have a small but dedicated network while larger manufacturers are concerned with little else but units sold.

Larger manufacturers like Ford have a better reputation that French/Italian manufacturers, could this be because they don't understand the UK market or a case of selling units is more important than what the customer wants.

The problem (IMO) is the larger dealership chains have too much influence, it's clear to see from surveys that the manufacturers that have 'control' over their dealerships perform better.
 
The dealer I brought my GP from was terrible.

I used a number of different dealers until I found one that was fantastic.

The dealer I brought my Focus from have been brilliant can not fault them at all.

Both of the good ones being small independent dealers.

I test drove the Kia cee'd prior to the focus, they were not very good and I have used a skoda dealer to buy something and they were not at all helpful.
 
The GP at the time of its launch did have good equipment and tech, it was and still is a good looking car.

However it is majorly let down on a number of things I have said on here before.

Design faults being a major attribution to a number faults on the GP which massively harms it's reputation. People on this forum are of problems with the GP, however the thousands out their who don't read this forum for example are not going to understand why their alternator keeps failing, because Fiat designed water to pour onto the back of it. I have never seen another car do this.

Water in the fusebox? Poor design

Splitting wiring loom in drivers door? Poor design

Washer hose splitting the boot? Poor design

Top mounts that have water sitting on them? Poor design

Water pouring onto the brake servo and rusting through potentially causing bulkhead failure? Poor design

Steering rack failures that really should of been sorted after the MK2 Punto again is poor design.

The list could go on for a long time, and most people on here have experienced faults on their cars that you just would not get on other cars so soon.

On top of that the GP is decidedly average to drive. These surveys will tend to be completed by people with lower to mid spec cars equipped with the underpowered 1.2 or 1.4 with no equipment on them. Combined with all the faults average driving dynamics I'm not surprised that it scores so low.

I would much rather be driving a dull looking car that's fantastic to drive and is reliable then standing their late for work or at the side of the road looking at a nice looking car going no where because the alternator failed.

On a side note, I read the other day that the M32 gearbox that is so awful and notchy can trace it's design back to the seventies. No wonder they keep failing also!!!

The GP would of been so much better had more time been spent on it then trying to rush it to launch before the chassis sharing Corsa came out, which incidentally is better made, better to drive and less faulty.

Again I suppose it's all personal opinion - I learned to drive in a (then brand-new) 1.4 8V Corsa, and I hated the damn thing; the trim was cheap, the interior was bland, the ride and seats were uncomfortable, the engine sounded like it was out of a diesel barge and it had no low-down torque whatsoever - it was rather vague and boring to drive too. When I first bought my Grande Punto it was a huge improvement, and I enjoy driving it. And when you're bored of driving a GP, you can just sit and stare at it for a while, and then you're ready for driving again :D
 
I had a 1994 punto as my first car...and didn't really think of them again. Went through many cars since 2004 when I had the first fiat.

Fast forward to now lol hubby wrote his car off...so I said what ever new car we get it will be mine and he can have my old one.

The 2014 fiesta we had as a courtesy car for 6 weeks was a dream.....but I woke up abruptly after 6 weeks and had to give it back.

I looked at so many small cars over the last month....but set my eyes on the GP and fell in love with it. The task was to then find a 5 door GP!

Well I'm happy to say I now have one....and wouldn't swap it for (a same year) fiesta for anything lol.
 
I was happy with my GP when I got it and it was working fine. However for me sadly it was far few and between when it was not faulty which is not acceptable on a modern car.

I was proud of the car and even made an appearance at Stanford hall with it when top gear was filming their and enjoyed the styling and the Italian emotion attached.

However it all became to much! The faults, the noisy agricultural engine, the steering all became more apparent as the faults arrived. Perhaps if the faults did not happen I could over look the other shortcomings!
 
Well some can rest happy because the punto/punto evo will eventually cease production and not be replaced.

I cast my mind back to the days when I had my Uno 45s what a hoot that was to drive with it's 1.0 fire engine! Hah

Times have most definitely changed with merging and collaborating motor manufacturers, the good old days are a thing if the past......

If the name goes i'll be sad to see it go, both my mark 1 puntos were good cars, a bit rubbish in places with the 55s but enough character to make up for it and the 85 elx was like driving a modern car that looked like a mk1 punto.

I'm also an Ex 45s uno owner, and that car demonstates everything a GP should have been but is not. It wasn't exactly reliable, it wasn't rapid or even mildly quick, the limits were hilariously low but it had a sense of fun to it, that was enough. Hell I stuck a sticker on the speedo so that over 80mph all the needle pointed to was a sign saying BELIEVE!!

I blame vauxhall...corsa chassis FTL
 
I remember seeing the adverts for the mk1 Punto and thinking it was a really cool car!!

A mk2 was my first car - and I loved it (most of the time)
 
I don't think the GP is a bad car at all, after reading that article it lowered my confidence about my car a bit, but I know as soon as I go look at it in the morning it will make me smile!

it's a cheap car, and it's a fiat, especially being the 1.2 it also doesn't move :D

They're alright cars, nice and comfortable to drive on my 2nd gearbox and clutch with bits of interior and exterior trim constantly rattling and such, but without slating any other members, I really cant imagine why someone would want to buy these cars new, especially a 1.2 / 1.4 active :/

Fiat imho really need to make a decent hot hatch with good interior build quality, lots of features, and decent sized pokey engines instead of the engine with the equivalent power of the motor that spins my microwaves glass plate around, instead of this 'mostly ugly people-carrier type cars, a bravo aka big grande punto, a punto with small engines thats half of the worst car knows as the corsa, and a spoilt teenage girls 14 reg first car aka the 500 that comes also in 500 different variations.'

Of course not everyone has the daft 21k+ required for a new abarth.

Originally I wanted a more higher spec more powerful GP for a new car soon since I really love the look of grande puntos, I mean the outside of them is stunning, especially in caribbean orange but imho you can get so much more for a lot less on the 2nd hand market.

I mean, if you want power you can pick up a clio 182 for <2k compared to a 1.4 tjet with high miles asking for 5/6k+
 
I thinks this is where Fiat missed the trick with the GP.

Fiats of old were about buzziness, fun and rortiness.

The GP was launched with a bland looking interior, was a fairly dull car to drive with mediocre power trains. It had good styling in its favour.

If you look at for example at a Fiesta 1.25 of the same era.. Very bland looking car also with a bland interior however you start pushing one of those with the Yamaha 16v engine, it's sweet short throw IB5 gear box excellent ride and handling you were grinning. Yes it wasn't fast but it was fun.

I always remember the most fun driving I have ever had was in a mk1 KA with the original 1.3 59bhp Endura E engine courtesy car.

The slowest least fun cars I have ever driven again both courtesy cars were a Peugeot 207 1.48v - terrible car anyway and a GP 1.2 woefully underpowered and equipped.
 
Further to the above 2nd on my list of the most fun I've had was surprisingly a 1.3 multi jet Panda. Grin inducing car to drive and again what Fiat should be about.
 
I thinks this is where Fiat missed the trick with the GP.

Fiats of old were about buzziness, fun and rortiness.

The GP was launched with a bland looking interior, was a fairly dull car to drive with mediocre power trains. It had good styling in its favour.

If you look at for example at a Fiesta 1.25 of the same era.. Very bland looking car also with a bland interior however you start pushing one of those with the Yamaha 16v engine, it's sweet short throw IB5 gear box excellent ride and handling you were grinning. Yes it wasn't fast but it was fun.

I always remember the most fun driving I have ever had was in a mk1 KA with the original 1.3 59bhp Endura E engine courtesy car.

The slowest least fun cars I have ever driven again both courtesy cars were a Peugeot 207 1.48v - terrible car anyway and a GP 1.2 woefully underpowered and equipped.


Agreed, my old uno wasn't fast but you could scream it along. The fire power plant was a great engine ?
 
If we're going down the route of fun cars to drive, my current TA 500 is grin inducing when you push along and the FIRE engined early Pandas can't be beaten for smiles per miles fun, at speeds that won't lose your licence.
 
There is a world of difference between the low spec GPs and the better trim/engined ones.

The 1.2 is still a great engine its just too underpowered for the heavy GP, its fine in other applications. The same is true of most superminis, my mum used to have a 59 reg 1.2 Clio and it was the slowest dullest thing in the world yet no one slags off the 192 because the smallest engine models are crap do they?
 
The 1.2 fire in the panda and 500 are fun, in the GP no fun. The same can be said of the also woeful 1.2 and 1.4 Corsa engines. I can not even begin to imagine what the 1.0 3cyl is like
 
Back
Top