Saying they were both driven by the stigg...
GP has 181.6 bhp @ 306 ft-lb + 1205KGs
vs
vRS has 173.2 bhp @ 290 ft-lb + Weight - 1315KGs
vs
vRS has 173.2 bhp @ 290 ft-lb + Weight - 1315KGs
Which one would be fastest? don't be biased!
well alot of ppl in sheffield think the fabia would win.
well alot of ppl in sheffield think the fabia would win.
well alot of ppl in sheffield think the fabia would win.
nah i think there stupid and winding me up.
A remapped vRS wasnt quicker than a standard Punto?!You think right. I've owned both. Well a remapped fabiarse and a standard GP. The fabia 'Felt' quicker but wasn't in reality its just its stupid lumpy torque curve from the crap turbo.
Always good 'My car vs another make of car' threads. All I can presume after owning a remapped vRS is that there isn't going to be much in it between the two cars. They're both 1.9 turbo diesels with similiar performance figures in standard tune, a remap on both won't drastically change much between them.
So the Punto stands even less of a chance than the vRS against a C2???From what the peeps reckon on Briskoda a remap takes the 0-60 down to just over 7 seconds..so it's at least on a par out of the blocks with a GPS, probably quicker. Still handle like a Robin Reliant with that big heavy diesel lump, quite a bit heavier than the GPS engine I believe.
Seen a guy **** all over a remapped Fabia Vrs in a pretty much standard C2 VTS on a trackday up at Anglesey. 180bhp Skoda v 135bhp VTS - Not even close....
Might have plenty of power but the Fabias still look and go like sh!te.
If we're going to do this thread... then we need specifics! track? quarter mile? Dry road? Ice?
There is so much more to a car than bhp/torque.