Well better late than never. Finally got round to getting a couple pics of my runaround

Here's one;

And this morning I had a rolling road day and with the saab been off the road I thought f**k it stick the fiat on.
And bearing in mind it is completely standard and hasn't been serviced for a while it made and this is no joke. . .

How the hell? Chuffed and confused. Lol
After seeing this I definatly have some plans for this.

Stay tuned

Either it's been 1.2'd (and that's still a good result) or the dyno was over optimistic (most likely).

If I didn't know any better, I'd be tempted to say that's lewisp's old cento...in which case it was deffo a 1.1?!

(I'm going by what I think are a TSG sticker and possible NS sticker that are just aboot visable?)

Yep it's Lewis's old Sei. Can't say the rollers was optimistic judging by the cars that was on before and after the fiat. Who knows was a good result and a ruddy good starting point. Lol

Rollers tend to be slightly optimistic on these performance dyno days for headline figures. Regardless, i'd doubt that it'd be 10bhp out on a 54bhp engine, (20%? and that's assuming the car had 54bhp, most are a little down on power due to mileage and lack of servicing etc).

Have seen the odd cento standard on dyno days put out good results beyond manufacturer claims (there is the odd standard one that has been known to give around 60bhp), so it's not impossible that it's just one of those engines coupled in with a slightly generous dyno, either way certainly a good result

What i will point out is the torque figures don't seem to add up to the increased bhp figures, with 20% more power, you'd expect a jump in torque too, yet there isn't.

Genuinely no idea how it made that power. And yea the torque doesn't seem to add up. According to the graph the bhp was still going up even at the redline. It didn't start tailing off as you would normally see.