I too would say 1.9.The power advantage of the 2.4 is not worth the hassle in terms of repairs.
I do not condone the cutting of bolts either,in one of my last posts i said the engine would need shifting in the bay thus needing removal of the mounts and joggle the engine about.This is the only way i can see work being done on the offside of the engine,although ive read of the bolt cutting way.Not quite engine out but not far off.
Mine has had this type of operation done twice.(engine moved in the bay method)First time for the timing belt,water pump,adjuster and idler,and second time recently for the alternator replacement.
I do not condone the cutting of bolts either,in one of my last posts i said the engine would need shifting in the bay thus needing removal of the mounts and joggle the engine about.This is the only way i can see work being done on the offside of the engine,although ive read of the bolt cutting way.Not quite engine out but not far off.
Mine has had this type of operation done twice.(engine moved in the bay method)First time for the timing belt,water pump,adjuster and idler,and second time recently for the alternator replacement.