General The Return of the Cento

Currently reading:
General The Return of the Cento

Joined
Sep 26, 2003
Messages
23,887
Points
3,817
Location
Northern Ireland
I just wanted to draw your attention to this post by ivantate in Lets Talk Fiat.

"Fiat Auto and Ford Europe are near a deal to build their next minicars at Fiat's plant in Poland starting in 2008, Automotive News Europe reports.

Fiat will build 120,000 units annually of each vehicle in its Tychy assembly plant, 310km south of Warsaw. Fiat's version will replace its Seicento minicar starting in 2008.

The Ford version will replace its Ka entry-level model starting later that year. The two companies are expected to sign the final agreement by the end of October. They signed a memorandum of understanding in late August.

Both vehicles will share a shortened version of the Fiat Panda's platform.

The Panda also is built in Tychy. The two vehicles also will share their entire powertrain and a number of major components, but will have very different body styles.

"It won't be the basic shape with just three different front and rear ends like the Citroen C1, Peugeot 107 and Toyota Aygo minicars," said a source familiar with the project. "Ford will add its own body to the Fiat underpinnings."

Ford's version will hit the market later because Fiat already has started development of its new minicar. To keep the designs different, the two cars won't share any body panels. Even the doors - one of the most expensive body parts - will be specific to each model. The C1, 107 and Aygo share their doors, roof and the entire greenhouse. Technically, the deal won't be a joint venture; it will be a manufacturing contract.

Fiat has similar product-supply agreements with Suzuki and PSA/Peugeot-Citroen. Starting in early 2006, Suzuki will supply Fiat with a version of its new SUV built in Hungary. Fiat will call its version the Sedici. By 2007, Fiat's longtime Turkish partner Turk Otomobil Fabrikasi (Tofas) will supply Citroen and Peugeot with a new light-commercial vehicle, currently dubbed the Minicargo. Fiat will make all the investments, except the parts specific to the Ka replacement, which Ford will pay for. Fiat will recover the research and development and plant tooling investments from the production fees it will charge Ford for the Ka replacements it builds.

Fiat will call its new Polish-built minicar the 500 after its famous predecessor. Between 1957 and 1977, Fiat built 3.9 million units of the 500, the icon of Italian basic transportation. The new Fiat 500 will be a three-door hatchback with four seats and an overall length of 3400mm. The design is derived from the 3+1 concept car unveiled at the 2004 Geneva motor show.

The new Ford will replace the aging Ka, built since 1997 in Valencia, Spain.

The cars will debut offering two, four-cylinder engines from Fiat: a 1.0-litre petrol unit and a 1.3-liter common-rail diesel. Fiat's powertrain subsidiary, Fiat Powertrain Technologies, also is working on a smaller petrol engine, which the two minicars will use by 2010.

Currently under development, this new engine will be a two- or three-cylinder unit with less than 1.0 litre of capacity. Fiat expects CO2 emissions to be less than 100 grams per kilometre. By 2008, European carmakers' average CO2 emissions in Europe should be less than 140g/km, so the small engine would help reduce the corporate average for both automakers."

It looks like the Cento name is safe and that's got to be good news for Cento owners and especially for Club Cento. :)
 
Hmm...

One hand says new new 500.. mmmm :D

The other hand says Dammit, I wont be able to point and laugh at small Ford things anymore
 
don't like the thought of them going back to 2/3 cylinders though. the 899 is nippy because it's a 4! If anyone has ever been in a suzuki swift you'll no what i mean, the three cylinder engine they have is awfully slow to pull away.

We're looking at around 30 seconds 0-60 i would've thought, which is ridiculus for a modern car. If they make it a twin it'll be even worse.
Modern 2 cylinder motorcycles are only quick coz they're light, if you put a 750 twin into a car theres no way it could top 75mph, so nobody in the uk would buy it. ok around town but downright dangerous on the motorway.

They way to beat emissions would surely be an electric/petrol hybrid. Leccy for around town and petrol for the open road, or when the batteries need a boost. best of both worlds that way, and it doesn't add much weight.

Jon.
 
project-cinqy said:
If anyone has ever been in a suzuki swift you'll no what i mean, the three cylinder engine they have is awfully slow to pull away

The old one was a shed but the new swift is a great machine, same with the mitsubishi colt
 
i think the cinq 899 is quick enough for the engine size

the only car that i really race and beat is the smart car

they are slower than anything
 
dillinger39 said:
the only car that i really race and beat is the smart car
Oh now thats just not fair - racing Smart cars is a bit like arm-wrestling old ladies.

As for three cylinders being sluggish, it depends on the car. Aren't most new Novas three cylinder? And the old Daihatsu Charade was three cylinder and very nippy with it. I just hope the new car looks like the Trepiuno show car!
 
project-cinqy said:
don't like the thought of them going back to 2/3 cylinders though. the 899 is nippy because it's a 4! If anyone has ever been in a suzuki swift you'll no what i mean, the three cylinder engine they have is awfully slow to pull away.

We're looking at around 30 seconds 0-60 i would've thought, which is ridiculus for a modern car. If they make it a twin it'll be even worse.
Modern 2 cylinder motorcycles are only quick coz they're light, if you put a 750 twin into a car theres no way it could top 75mph, so nobody in the uk would buy it. ok around town but downright dangerous on the motorway.

They way to beat emissions would surely be an electric/petrol hybrid. Leccy for around town and petrol for the open road, or when the batteries need a boost. best of both worlds that way, and it doesn't add much weight.

Jon.

Every engine is different. There should be nothing wrong with a modern 3 cylinder. Have a look at the engine in the Aygo/107/1007, that's a 3 cylinder. 3 cylinders is also likely to bring down costs etc.

Don't get me started about hybrids, I hate them!
 
project-cinqy said:
don't like the thought of them going back to 2/3 cylinders though. the 899 is nippy because it's a 4! If anyone has ever been in a suzuki swift you'll no what i mean, the three cylinder engine they have is awfully slow to pull away.

We're looking at around 30 seconds 0-60 i would've thought, which is ridiculus for a modern car. If they make it a twin it'll be even worse.
Modern 2 cylinder motorcycles are only quick coz they're light, if you put a 750 twin into a car theres no way it could top 75mph, so nobody in the uk would buy it. ok around town but downright dangerous on the motorway.

They way to beat emissions would surely be an electric/petrol hybrid. Leccy for around town and petrol for the open road, or when the batteries need a boost. best of both worlds that way, and it doesn't add much weight.

Jon.

You wanna race my Lupo TDi mate. Didn't think so. You'd soon change ya mind about 3 cylinders being quick off the line. Oh and BTW £85 a year road TAX says my emissions are good
 
MotorWorldChink said:
You wanna race my Lupo TDi mate. Didn't think so. You'd soon change ya mind about 3 cylinders being quick off the line. Oh and BTW £85 a year road TAX says my emissions are good

Erm, you can't compare a Turbo Diesel to a 'normal' petrol engine! Take the Turbo off the Lupo, and then it'd be like a normal Diesel... ie. slow.

Lupo's look like great cars though, and the TDI's look like very good engines (y)
 
not really, coz theres a big difference between a turbo diesel and a 993cc petrol motor!!!!! i mean a small 3 cylinder lump would be pants! they're gonna make it 1000cc max by the look of it. As long as it's ohc it wont be 2 bad.


Jon
 
Thats pretty good, Ok I stand corrected. If only suzuki had put that motor in the swift they'd've been laughing. My mates looks fast, and goes v. slow. makes around 49 bhp I think. lol Our 899 cinq makes more than that! lol

Jon
 
They way to beat emissions would surely be an electric/petrol hybrid. Leccy for around town and petrol for the open road, or when the batteries need a boost. best of both worlds that way, and it doesn't add much weight.

I have to agree, I think a hybrid engine would be far better if Fiat are trying to hit emmisions. The new Lexus is a hybrid and meant to be a very good one at that, id like to see Fiat head the same way but :bang: not gonna happen!

Adam
 
Smart cars are slow but those citroen 2cv's now they are slower than anything.

Infact am surprised they are allowed on the motorways, I got stuck behind one once on the M6 it was struggling to do 58mph i was like come on, come on arghh.

come on 899 hahahaha

leave them in my dust hahahah.

I do think that the 899 is a really well designed engine though. It eats hardly any petrol compared to cars in the same class. It accelarates well up to about 60 (then it struggles) and cruises well at 70. I do reckon that the 899 cinq is faster than the 899 seicento though. I have raced one of them.

If fiat decide to use a small engine in the car i reckon the 899 would be perfect. But if they use something smaller it would be more like a large smart car

Slow and clumsy and easy to get past
 
Back
Top