cardinalbiggles
Member
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2008
- Messages
- 600
- Points
- 94
Does that apply to the newer 165 as well?
Does that apply to the newer 165 as well?
a Alfa/fiat specialist who said anything over 40k and you're on borrowed time. Especially with a 16v mj as they go through water pumps, so make sure it gets replaced too.
What advice should we be taking here as there are many different recommendations floating around. The specialists say the above but the Fiat recommendation for the timing belt change is at much higher mileage? I know that it is practical to have the water pump changed at the same time as the belt but what about the other way around. Does the belt need doing if the pump is done?
My Bravo is approaching the 40,000 miles mark, just shy of 38k at the moment and the car will be 4 years old in November 2013.
So to take this as an example, if a Fiat specialist is saying the above, is it wise the change the water pump at around the 40k mile mark? and if so does the belt also need doing at the same time?
This is all quite confusing as it doesn't follow Fiat recommendations... I just want my car to see me through without any big avoidable problems, as I'm sure everyone else does - but it would seem crazy to spend money unnecessarily!
Austen
Fiat do recommend 72k or 5 years whichever comes first. Personally I would use that as a maximum rather than a recommended time.
My car is now just over 5 years old since registration, but over 5.5 years since build. I have checked my belt and it is in remarkably good condition, it would probably go for another 20,000 miles easily, BUT...
Belt might be ok but the tensioners might be weak. Just not worth risking, unless you paid £200 for the car!
Belt might be ok but the tensioners might be weak. Just not worth risking, unless you paid £200 for the car!