Panda (Classic) Panda 4x4 Sisley [H951 THO]

Currently reading:
Panda (Classic) Panda 4x4 Sisley [H951 THO]

Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
4,289
Points
1,184
Location
Selby
MOT. New tyres, battery, exhaust. Good original example. Family owned since 2000, RED, £1,550 60k

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201405053930817/


1.jpg

2.jpg

3.jpg

4.jpg

5.jpg

6.jpg
 
www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Fiat-Panda-SISLEY-4X4-/322406752673?hash=item4b10f0a1a1:g:XwsAAOSwA3dYjmU0

£5000

silverstonecars said:
Two original keys, Rare panda sisley 4x4, Lots of history,Metallic red, Runs and drives well fun little car. WE OFFER COMPREHENSIVE RAC WARRANTY'S ON ALL CARS -Specialists In Sourcing High Quality Used Cars, £5,000

ebay Spec.PNG

01.jpg

02.jpg

03.jpg

04.jpg

05.jpg

06.jpg

07.jpg

08.jpg

09.jpg

10.jpg

11.jpg

12.jpg

MOT HISTORY said:
Check the MOT history of a vehicle


Registration number: H951THO


  • Vehicle make FIAT
  • Vehicle model PANDA
  • Date first used 8 February 1991
  • Fuel type Petrol
  • Colour Red


MOT history of this vehicle


  • Test date 17 January 2017
  • Expiry date 16 January 2018
  • Test Result Pass
  • Odometer reading 70,942 miles
  • MOT test number 6630 8192 4050
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
    Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases slight blow front pipe area (7.1.2)
    nearside rear Rear wheel bearing has slight play (2.6.2)

  • Test date 18 November 2016
  • Test Result Fail
  • Odometer reading 70,939 miles
  • MOT test number 4662 8025 4735
  • Reason(s) for failure
    nearside front Direction indicator not working (1.4.A.2c)
    Exhaust system not adequately supported centre rubber hanger broken (7.1.1)
    nearside front lower Front suspension has excessive play in a lower suspension ball joint (2.5.B.1a)
    nearside front Front suspension retaining device ineffective track arm inner bolt loose (2.5.A.4)
    engine mounting bracket insecure and likely to fail rear gearbox mount (6.1.D.1b)
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
    Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases slight blow from manifold area (7.1.2)
    offside rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive inner sill under (5.2.6)
    offside rear Rear wheel bearing has slight play (2.6.2)

  • Test date 10 June 2015
  • Expiry date 15 June 2016
  • Test Result Pass
  • Odometer reading 68,910 miles
  • MOT test number 3285 0196 5133
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Nearside Front suspension ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)

  • Test date 10 June 2015
  • Test Result Fail
  • Odometer reading 68,910 miles
  • MOT test number 8887 2176 5129
  • Reason(s) for failure
    Nearside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
    Offside Headlamp aim beam image obviously incorrect (1.8.A.1b)
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Nearside Front suspension ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)

  • Test date 16 June 2014
  • Expiry date 15 June 2015
  • Test Result Pass
  • Odometer reading 60,334 miles
  • MOT test number 8366 3776 4107
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Nearside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)

  • Test date 5 June 2014
  • Test Result Fail
  • Odometer reading 60,334 miles
  • MOT test number 9360 5605 4150
  • Reason(s) for failure
    Offside Lower Front suspension ball joint dust cover excessively deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
    Nearside Track rod end ball joint dust cover excessively deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.2.C.1c)
    Offside Track rod end ball joint dust cover excessively deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.2.C.1c)
    Nearside Rear Brake pipe inadequately supported (3.6.B.1)
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Nearside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
    rear prop shaft(rear uj) slightly worn

  • Test date 20 August 2013
  • Expiry date 19 August 2014
  • Test Result Pass
  • Odometer reading 60,295 miles
  • MOT test number 2175 6223 3283
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Oil leak

  • Test date 24 July 2013
  • Test Result Fail
  • Odometer reading 60,289 miles
  • MOT test number 6698 1570 3238
  • Reason(s) for failure
    Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
    Fuel pipe leaking (7.2.3)
    Front Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
    Centre Exhaust system not adequately supported (7.1.1)
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Oil leak

  • Test date 20 August 2012
  • Expiry date 19 August 2013
  • Test Result Pass
  • Odometer reading 60,262 miles
  • MOT test number 5493 2313 2295
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    under body condition poor

  • Test date 1 December 2011
  • Test Result Fail
  • Odometer reading 60,243 miles
  • MOT test number 1857 9553 1390
  • Reason(s) for failure
    Nearside Front Direction indicator not working (1.4.A.2c)
    Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
    Centre Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
    Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b)
    Offside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b)
    Nearside Rear Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b)
    Offside Rear Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b)
    Nearside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b)
    Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
    Offside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
    Offside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
    Offside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded (5.2.6)
    Vehicle structure excessively corroded within 30cm of towbar mounting (6.6.6)
    rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
    Nearside front brake binding (3.7.B.1)
    Nearside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
  • Advisory notice item(s)
    Rear Service brake: service brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
 
Last edited:
This post contains affiliate links which may earn a commission at no additional cost to you.
Looks like it's had it's fair share of welding! Bur has it been done to the required 5K Standards ;)

There was a guy asking about this in the Facebook group a few weeks ago. He felt he got ripped off after buying it from a dealer following seeing how much they bought it for. Looking at the pictures it doesn't seem any thing too special. Certainly not £5k special but may look different in the flesh.
 
There was a guy asking about this in the Facebook group a few weeks ago. He felt he got ripped off after buying it from a dealer following seeing how much they bought it for. Looking at the pictures it doesn't seem any thing too special. Certainly not £5k special but may look different in the flesh.

He didn't pay anywhere near £5k for it though did he?! He was on about painting it too so it can't be perfect.
 
It's not the first of April yet is it [emoji209][emoji209][emoji209][emoji209][emoji209]Possibly its just an advertising ploy.
 
Here is one that has been mentioned on the forum before, its a Sisley 4x4 H951 THO being sold this time through silverstone car sourcing, Towcester

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Fiat-Panda-SISLEY-4X4-/322406752673?hash=item4b10f0a1a1:g:XwsAAOSwA3dYjmU0

Was for sale in May 2014 through Autotrader, and then again in January 2017 according to this thread. For the purposes of keeping all the information together I am posting this in the original thread from 2014 which was updated in January with MOT results etc

Hasnt been papped on flickr
 
This post contains affiliate links which may earn a commission at no additional cost to you.
Back
Top