Technical Post your MOT results here

Currently reading:
Technical Post your MOT results here

Well, did it pass?

  • Yes, passed without advisory items

    Votes: 14 53.8%
  • Yes, passed but with advisory items

    Votes: 5 19.2%
  • Yes, but only after having additional work done

    Votes: 4 15.4%
  • No, I took it away to get fixed elsewhere

    Votes: 3 11.5%

  • Total voters
    26

jrkitching

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 1, 2010
Messages
11,382
Points
2,927
Location
Dorset
Well it doesn't take long for three years to pass by, and it's time for Maybelline's first MOT moment.

Whilst waiting, I thought it might be useful to start a thread where everyone can post their MOT results - hopefully over time we can build up a picture of common failure items, so that we know what to look out for before submitting our cars for testing.

I'd suggest we post the age of the car, the mileage, what needed fixing and how much we had to shell out.

I'll be back in a few minutes...
 
3rd year passed with advisory on corrosion to rear silencer, no need to act
4th year passed with advisory on brake pads and discs, i knew this and replaced a few months later with uprated items
5th year passed with advisory on corrosion to rear silencer, no need to act
 
I'm back now and all is well (y).

First MOT - 3yrs / 19779 miles
Result: Pass - no advisory items
Cost: £54.85

Where I live, there are many garages offering cut-price MOT's for as little as £25. However, I chose to ignore all of these offers and paid the full price to have the test done at my local small independent garage. Why, you may ask, would the notoriously super-frugal JR choose to pay more than would seem necessary?

Firstly, no garage can make a profit doing MOT's for £25. It's a good 40-45 mins work, you need quite a bit of expensive testing kit which also needs frequent recalibration, and the testers need to be both well qualified and regularly trained. So those cut-price discounters are banking on getting enough additional profitable work to cover the loss they make on the testing. Their main business is selling stuff like tyres and exhausts - both very common failure items - and if you're looking at an instant fail, they know you'll be much less likely to shop around & will quote you accordingly.

Secondly, the risk of collateral damage is greater if you go to a Kwik-fit style MOT centre - and if they put a lifting beam in the wrong place & dent the sills, you'll be posting to another popular thread here :mad:. Leaving the car in a workshop where YTS apprentices chuck exhausts about next to the MOT bay just doesn't do it for me.

Thirdly, I like to support local village businesses if I can. There's truth in the old adage of 'Use it - or lose it'.

Fourthly, it's convenient. I just drove the car over & walked back home, made a cup of tea & sat down to write this drivel... A phone call to say it'd been done & I was back home 5 minutes later.

The best bit was when I cautioned the tester against jacking a 500 on the sills; he just smiled & said "I'd never jack any car on the sills - there are just too many fragile panels & plastic trims on modern cars to ever take the risk". Those words alone made it worth every penny :).
 
Last edited:
I'm back now and all is well (y).

First MOT - 3yrs / 19779 miles
Result: Pass - no advisory items
Cost: £54.85

Where I live, there are many garages offering cut-price MOT's for as little as £25. However, I chose to ignore all of these offers and paid the full price to have the test done at my local small independent garage. Why, you may ask, would the notoriously super-frugal JR choose to pay more than would seem necessary?

Firstly, no garage can make a profit doing MOT's for £25. It's a good 40-45 mins work, you need quite a bit of expensive testing kit which also needs frequent recalibration, and the testers need to be both well qualified and regularly trained. So those cut-price discounters are banking on getting enough additional profitable work to cover the loss they make on the testing. Their main business is selling stuff like tyres and exhausts - both very common failure items - and if you're looking at an instant fail, they know you'll be much less likely to shop around & will quote you accordingly.

Secondly, the risk of collateral damage is greater if you go to a Kwik-fit style MOT centre - and if they put a lifting beam in the wrong place & dent the sills, you'll be posting to another popular thread here :mad:. Leaving the car in a workshop where YTS apprentices chuck exhausts about next to the MOT bay just doesn't do it for me.

Thirdly, I like to support local village businesses if I can. There's truth in the old adage of 'Use it - or lose it'.

Fourthly, it's convenient. I just drove the car over & walked back home, made a cup of tea & sat down to write this drivel... A phone call to say it'd been done & I was back home 5 minutes later.

The best bit was when I cautioned the tester against jacking a 500 on the sills; he just smiled & said "I'd never jack any car on the sills - there are just too many fragile panels & plastic trims on modern cars to ever take the risk". Those words alone made it worth every penny :).

Here here, i always take my car to the local village garage, sure its more expensive (not by much at all though) but the chaps are friendly, trust worthy and always get a good MOT/Service

My MOT is not for another 6 months, when I bought the car the MOT slip was a straight pass
 
In Greece mot is after 4 years so i have some time :)
And my indie offered to pass me 'no matter what, 100% pass :)
 
Last edited:

Attachments

  • Bodge1.jpg
    Bodge1.jpg
    21.6 KB · Views: 203
Last edited:
You know i actually think so you should see the state of some of the bangers here. The other day i saw a fiat uno on the road with a bent chassis! The rear wheels were to the right of the front wheels!
 
Last edited:
1st MOT, pass - no advisories
2nd MOT, pass - no advisories
3rd MOT (just a week or two ago), pass - with advisories*:
- front tyres nearly illegal (got them replaced)
- one of rear drums sticking (repaired)

*Having said this, I wasn't present, this was a report from another family member, the car had its service at the same time (at our local garage) so I guess maybe those things were done in the service and then it was tested... either way, those were the issues.

We also have had a corroded back box replaced about a year ago.
 
I should also mention that when I had my first MOT, they failed it on there being damage to the tyre, but that's not the cars fault and personally I think they were being OTT as it was only a tiny cut, drove home, popped my winters on and triumphantly passed the MOT, the dealership monkey wanted to fail me because my wheels were a touch corroded. Jobsworth.
 
My Abarth passed its first MOT in November, no advisories. It did have a corroded back box on exhaust when I bought the car which I didn't notice, and did appear to be blowing slightly, but on complaining the dealer swapped the exhaust for a new one. I count myself very lucky that they did this! I'm not sure if it would have failed because of this though.
 
He wanted to try and pry some more money from you, more like.
I would sooner have had the car failed and come back when I got my front tyres replaced. he was also enough of a fugwit to tell the service receptionist to tell me that I shouldn't drive around in the summer on winter tyres. I was tempted to go around the back and imprint the E mark from the tyres on his forehead :)

I actually like my dealership though, that said I might take it to the council depot this year.
 
I've got a brilliant guy that's 2 mins drive from my place - first went there 7 years ago with my Jag XJ40 (which drew some remarks from him as I was 27, running a 3.6L metallic gold Jag!), and he's remembered me ever since.

Always fair, realises I know what I'm talking about, and knows that whilst I won't necessarily give him work to do, I'll always take my cars (and family members) there.
 
Back
Top