General Who would want to buy a 500?

Currently reading:
General Who would want to buy a 500?

306maxi

STOP! Hammer time!
Joined
Mar 3, 2008
Messages
24,547
Points
3,703
Location
The Welsh Riviera
It seems someone missed the point where Fiat stopped making crapshacks and started to make reliable and desirable cars. What a moron! The 500 is a runaway success and the 500c was selling before people had even seen the car......

http://www.autocar.co.uk/blogs/anythinggoes/archive/2009/07/17/fancy-a-fiat-or-elle-macpherson.aspx

Fancy a Fiat? Or Elle Macpherson?

James Ruppert

Elle Macpherson snapped driving Fiat 500C!

Apparently that’s what counts as a news story these days, though there is a huge whiff of PR puffery about the story, which made headlines (elsewhere) last week.

Elle%20Macpherson%20Fiat%20500C.jpg


Apparently, Elle ‘fell in love’ when loaned a 500C and will be taking delivery of her own soon. I am sure the multi-millionaire business woman will be paying for her car, too...

Quite why Fiat needs Elle to draw attention to the 500C is beyond me. Then again, quite why anyone would want any Fiat is something of a mystery to me.

Elle%20Macpherson%20Fiat%20500C%20close-up.jpg


That said, even though there have always been some difficult design periods for the marque, a Thema 8.32 would certainly be amusing and I’ve always wanted the dashboard of a Lancia Trevi as an object d’art. But that was a Lancia, wasn’t it?

No, I’ve never got on with Fiats. In fact, everyone I’ve ever known who had one has encountered problems.

Fiat%20Stilo.jpg


I thought I loved the new Panda, until a friend got one and the head gasket blew. What’s more, the dealer could not have been less interested.

Then there is the Fiat Coupe that a close relative bought. It failed so spectacularly that they were obliged to replace it with another new one. It then depreciated at a spectacular rate – he paid £25k and was lucky to get £2995 for it with only 30,000 miles on the clock.

The new Punto is pretty, but I worry. Thinking back to 1978 I remember someone I worked with got a Supermiafiori - and he quickly renamed it a Crappymiafiori.

Fiat%20Punto.jpg


A man of my advanced years may well fancy a toned ex-supermodel, but I still need a lot of convincing to invest any of my hard earned into any Fiat shaped car.

How about you?

Comments please :D
 
Utter n*bhead.

In future I am always going to base my buying decisions on something someone else bought in 1978. :tosser:

What makes me laugh is that I had a '79 Mirafiori (I can spell correctly) and it was most reliable car I've ever owned! My mum loved it so so much and she's not even a car person. If a car can win over someone who doesn't even like cars it must be doing something right.....
 
All I can say is that people who write articles like this are either doing it for effect or have deep rooted psychological problems which probably stem from having a father with unreal expectations or being repeatedly locked in a cupboard. Its odd the way they seem to take it so personally, as if Fiat were making bad cars specifically to p**s the bloke off.

Anyway I wouldn't mind going for a ride with elle mcpherson with her top down... giggety.
 
'79 Mirafiori

Mates Dad had one of these as the household 2nd car, never any bother, went like stink for its year, never any problems!

(y)



PS And what would journos know about ANYTHING!!??

Those that can....do...those that can't ......write about it......:D


PPSS As for Ms MacPherson..........:D:D:D:D;):D:D:D:D.....though she is getting on a bit.........for the likes of myself......:p
 
Fiat wise I've owned; 1972 500L (first car, purchased in 1973), 1976 126(purchased new), and a 1973 850 van. My mum has owned a 1961 600 (late 60's), 1972 500 (early 70's), and a 1976 126 (mid 70's). All these Fiats were totally reliable, despite the era we're talking!
 
Mates Dad had one of these as the household 2nd car, never any bother, went like stink for its year, never any problems!

(y)

The Mirafiori was just a great car. As is always said it was the Italian Escort :)

We had ours since about the mid 80's and it only ever broke down once which I think is an achievment for any car of that age. All my dad ever did was replace consumables on it and it ran really well.
 
Fiat wise I've owned; 1972 500L (first car, purchased in 1973), 1976 126(purchased new), and a 1973 850 van. My mum has owned a 1961 600 (late 60's), 1972 500 (early 70's), and a 1976 126 (mid 70's). All these Fiats were totally reliable, despite the era we're talking!
I think the problem with Fiats was mainly the owners. A Fiat needs to be maintained as per the handbook, some cars will tolerate a little abuse and not being service quite as regularly but Fiats just don't like it.
 
To read the words of an article that features Elle Macpherson draped over a 500c is to miss the point entirely.

:)
 
He demonstrated that he isn't a competent journalist, and that Autocar has become the Sun of motoring mags.

This is a real shame because once upon a time it was an honest compendium of automotive news and took its job seriously.

I also think there is another rather sinister angle to this. Fiat is doing very well again now, and the competition is running scared. At the moment Fiat's sales are holding up better than any other car manufacturing group in Europe. I'd not be in the least surprised if money has changed hands.
 
He demonstrated that he isn't a competent journalist, and that Autocar has become the Sun of motoring mags.

This is a real shame because once upon a time it was an honest compendium of automotive news and took its job seriously.

I also think there is another rather sinister angle to this. Fiat is doing very well again now, and the competition is running scared. At the moment Fiat's sales are holding up better than any other car manufacturing group in Europe. I'd not be in the least surprised if money has changed hands.

I know, I was being silly. It's a babe on a 500c, who cares what the annoying old man has written :D
 
I think its the influence of Top Gear. Because they've introduced a sense of fun and "laddishness" to car journalism, everyone else thinks they can do it, but whereas TG generally pull it off, most of the others who jump on the bandwagon just come across as opinionated, annoying and ill-informed. It's a fine line.
 
I think its the influence of Top Gear. Because they've introduced a sense of fun and "laddishness" to car journalism, everyone else thinks they can do it, but whereas TG generally pull it off, most of the others who jump on the bandwagon just come across as opinionated, annoying and ill-informed. It's a fine line.
The thing is Top Gear generally only criticise cars legitimately and overemphasise things to reinforce a legitimate point whereas this guy is just flat out making stuff up
 
Back
Top