| | #1 | ||
| Hi All, Have just put a deposit down on a 2.0 petrol Eleganza, pre reg, 9 miles on clock 05 plate from Betts in Hemel for 12995. I spent most of the afternoon deliberating over the new petrol, a 53 plate/2.0 JTD Eleganza (26000 miler)same price or an 04 plate/2.2 JTD Eleganza (10k but £500 more). The new model swung it for me but I'm still unsure about economy and general living with it. Betts offered me 10.5k for my 05 Nissan Primera 2.2 Dci SVE (3700 miles), which was about the right book price. Reason for changing my Nissan - am expecting triplets in Jan!!! And the Nissan just isn't big enough - so had to be an MPV....did usual research - Ulysse seemed great VFM, and having driven both the petrol and diesel the newness won over (At the time). Question for all you Ulysse buyers, what economy can I expect from the petrol or should I go back and buy a diesel? Your advice would be much appreciated whilst I scour Ebay for many baby seats etc.... PS Am looking forward to the Ulysse ownership...........
__________________
| |||
| |
|
| | #2 | ||
| Re: New Ulysse - 2.0 16v petrol economy The petrol should consume 25%-30% more. In addition the Diesel, especially the 2.2, has far higher torque which results in much better everyday performance. Don't be impressed by 0-60 and max speed data, they are not reflecting actual performance.
__________________
| |||
| |
|
| | #3 | ||
| Re: New Ulysse - 2.0 16v petrol economy Apis, So you think a second hand diesel is a better bet than a un-used, new petrol then?
__________________
| |||
| |
|
| | #4 | ||
| New Ulysse - 2.0 16v petrol economy What I say is that a Diesel is much better, but of course new car is much better than a used one... Make your own considerations
__________________
| |||
| |
|
| | #5 | ||
| It was broken, honest | Re: New Ulysse - 2.0 16v petrol economy Congratulations, sounds like you need a MPV with triplets on the way. I have a petrol automatic and it is fine, with a manual you should get at least 28mpg as we get 27mpg round town. From what others have experienced with the Ulysse, the diesel doesn't offer more than a 15% difference in fuel consumption. The fuel burning heaters in the diesels add about 10% consumption in the winter which goes some way to explain why the difference isn't as great. If it is the economy of the diesel your worried about, then the additional cost of the car, diesel fuel and servicing costs (12K diesel and 18K petrol), probably don't add up to much if any saving for the average family mileage. A lot of diesel cars simply don't make sense due to the additional running and purchase costs unless you are doing a lot of mileage. I haven't driven the 2.2 diesel, but the petrol was much better than the 2,0 diesel I drove. I think the diesel would only show an advantage up hill if the car was fully loaded. Check out www.eurovan2.com as this has loads of info specific to the cars.
__________________
| ||
| |
|
| | #6 | ||
| 5vp3r m0d | Re: New Ulysse - 2.0 16v petrol economy Our long term average, as per the Ulysse trip, is about 33mpg - this is on a 2.2JTD - not sure how accurate this is, though, but makes sense with the 15% comment above. It would be interesting for me to experience a 2.0 diesel - the pull in our 2.2 is immense BUT there is a very good reason for that! REMAP Having left south coast earlier [after seeing poggy and his family ], we travelled 120 miles north, mainly on dual carriageways and motorways - the car has immense pull, and is left in 5th gear ALL the time on long stretches - no need to change down for overtaking, and makes the driving so much more relaxing. I don't think many cars actually overtook us
__________________ Electroclash Panda 100HP ![]() Red brake calipers - done / Red highlights on engine cover - done Red GSR kit - done / Red badges - done / Cobra springs - done ![]() ![]() | ||
| |
|
| | #7 | ||
| It was broken, honest | Re: New Ulysse - 2.0 16v petrol economy Now if I could have a remapped 2.2 diesel automatic, I would probably take that for the torque alone. Don't know how much you can add with a 2.0 remap, we drove a standard one. I am waiting to be able to remap our petrol engine to get more torque. Out of interest I reset the computer today when I met Stu and got 28.6mpg, which was town and country lane driving.
__________________
| ||
| |
|
| | #8 | ||
| 5vp3r m0d | Re: New Ulysse - 2.0 16v petrol economy The remap, for any noobs out there, not only took the 2.2 from 122bhp to about 165bhp, but also increased the torque immensely.
__________________ Electroclash Panda 100HP ![]() Red brake calipers - done / Red highlights on engine cover - done Red GSR kit - done / Red badges - done / Cobra springs - done ![]() ![]() | ||
| |
|
| | #9 | ||
| RIP L181 VBB | Re: New Ulysse - 2.0 16v petrol economy i suppose if fuel economy isnt as good as hoped maybe LPG could be something you would consider at a later date perhaps
__________________ ![]() 2001 Modded Sei Sporting - GONE!! 1998 Ford Mondeo 1.8LX - P/X'ed 2002 02 Ford Focus 1.6 Zetec w/ Climate Pack! | ||
| |
|
| | #10 | ||
| Re: New Ulysse - 2.0 16v petrol economy @ poggy! The JTD is a little lazy at the first 1-2 seconds after standing and at extreme engine speeds. Maybe that gave you the impression that the petrol is stronger. In all other situations the Diesel is much faster. Regarding the additional heater, It is significant in short journies at cold weather (<50 degrees). If it is not that cold or the engine have reached operating temprature, it will not work.
__________________
| |||
| |
|
| | #11 | ||
| It was broken, honest | Re: New Ulysse - 2.0 16v petrol economy The petrol seems to out accelerate the 2,0 diesel easily from a stand still and when overtaking, I think the difference may come when it is fully loaded with 7 people and luggage. There is almost 2.5 seconds between the 0-60 times of the two cars and you can feel it from a standing start, I found the petrol to be a lot more responsive when trying to pull out of junctions etc which is when you need the acceleration. As we normally only have 4 in the car, it seemed to be the best option.
__________________
| ||
| |
|
| | #12 | |||||
| Re: New Ulysse - 2.0 16v petrol economy
I have a JTD 2.2 and on long journeys I have had as high as 37 MPG (Polish fuel: has always given the best in all my cars) to 27 MPG (quite heavily loaded). The average on out of town driving is about 32-33 MPG which ties in with the 15% difference quoted by Poggy this is with it being pushed. In London driving it is not good with an average of around 28 MPG. I'm sure I test drove a Peugeot 807 diesel 2.0 and found the 2.2 diesel to be more powerful. Having said that the equivalent Fiat feels more powerful and is definitely more responsive then the Peugeot. Lou
__________________
| ||||||
| |
|
| | #13 | |||||
| Re: New Ulysse - 2.0 16v petrol economy
Stuart, what is this remap thingy and where can i get it done, i am driving 2.0JTD on an 04 plate. I have had the beast for 3 weeks now and to be honest i love it. Kev...
__________________
| ||||||
| |
|
| | #14 | ||
| 5vp3r m0d | Re: New Ulysse - 2.0 16v petrol economy Hi Kev I would recommend you get in touch with alfanige at www.angeltuning.com - they also advertise on this forum [see top banner]
__________________ Electroclash Panda 100HP ![]() Red brake calipers - done / Red highlights on engine cover - done Red GSR kit - done / Red badges - done / Cobra springs - done ![]() ![]() | ||
| |
|
| | #15 | |||
| Re: New Ulysse - 2.0 16v petrol economy
Thanks Stuart. Have called them and got the tech bits. Can anyone who has had this done please PM me with there comments etc. Thanks Kev..
__________________ 2.0 JTD 16V Ulysse Dynamic & loving it | ||||
| |
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1.6 16v Fuel Economy | jcarrier | Multipla | 6 | 12-10-2006 07:35 |
| Tipo 2.0 16v. green injectors | tododelado | Tipo | 1 | 18-04-2005 18:32 |
| Power loss and emission error on 2.0 16V | DanD | Ulysse | 13 | 30-01-2004 23:12 |