Vietislav
New member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2017
- Messages
- 15
- Points
- 9
I'm 6'5" tall with arms and legs long enough for a man of 6'8", so it's very rare indeed for me to climb into a car and feel immediately as if it's been specifically tailor-made for me. But that's precisely how I feel about the Fiat Qubo. And it feels so good. Glory hallelujah.
Add to this the fact that I'm specifically looking for a smallish car which does many miles to the gallon and which also has significant load space - and you'll understand just how tempting the Qubo looks both on paper and in person. I also prefer non-mainstream cars (as long as they're not damn silly like the Nissan Cube), so again the Qubo scores well.
But here's the thing. Everywhere I look, I see adverse reviews of the vehicle by people who actually own one. Whether it be reviews of the Qubo/Fiorino on Roadtestreports.co.uk or on Carbuyer.co.uk, or whether it be reviews of the identical Peugeot Bipper Tepee or Citroen Nemo Multispace or their van equivalents, I see negative after negative.
Okay, so people who don't have an axe to grind don't generally make a beeline for Owner Review websites in order to sound off, so in theory I could kid myself that all the moaners and groaners on those sites are an unrepresentative sample of Qubo owners, most of whom are happy and therefore silent. But what I do notice is that it's basically the same problems which are being mentioned again and again in the unfavourable reviews: judderings in high gears, electronics failing, wheel bearings developing problems, front tyres wearing out far too fast, electric windows conking out, warning lights being permanently displayed, door catches misbehaving, nasty smoke coming from the exhaust, fumes pouring from under the bonnet etc., etc., etc. Even the rear door hinges on the vans go rusty too early in their lives, it would appear.
Glancing at eBay and AutoTrader.co.uk, I also notice that there are a lot of Qubos/Fiorinos (and their Peugeot and Citroen equivalents) which appear to have had an unnatural number of owners, e.g. seven-year-old cars with five previous owners, which implies that after a year or so of ownership the owners simply admit defeat and give up the unwinnable struggle. Or an advertiser will say ‘recent new turbo’ or ‘thousands spent’, which at first glance reads like a recommendation but which can also be taken to mean that the car is simply a money pit on wheels. Fiat customer service at dealership level doesn't appear to be too great either, rendering the whole concept of a warranty something of a travesty. That's to say, if Fiat dealers can't figure out what's causing a problem with a Qubo, they simply shrug their shoulders and do nothing.
I find all this deeply worrying and have several times decided to forget all about Qubos, since my finances are tight and I can't afford to make a costly mistake. But every time a Qubo, Fiorino, Bipper or Nemo passes me on the road, I get this wistful feeling, not least because I know I'd feel so unbelievably comfortable behind the wheel. (Years ago, when I was hoping to learn to drive, I approached 25 driving schools before I found one with a car I could actually fit into, so you'll appreciate just what an amazing find the Qubo represents on that score.)
So, what would you advise? Are only a relative handful of Qubos absolute clunkers? Are most of them great and that's why you're all on this web forum, to agree how great they are? Or are Qubos sadly a good design wrecked by poor quality control in a factory in Turkey and therefore to be avoided at all costs? And would I be out of my mind to contemplate a 600-mile round trip in one? Is it only safe to use them as run-arounds close to home?
In a nutshell, is owning a Qubo like supporting Notts County - something which only a romantic idiot would do, because the reality is that there's actually no positive, rewarding aspect to it at all, just never-ending frustration and misery?
Thanks for your thoughts.
Add to this the fact that I'm specifically looking for a smallish car which does many miles to the gallon and which also has significant load space - and you'll understand just how tempting the Qubo looks both on paper and in person. I also prefer non-mainstream cars (as long as they're not damn silly like the Nissan Cube), so again the Qubo scores well.
But here's the thing. Everywhere I look, I see adverse reviews of the vehicle by people who actually own one. Whether it be reviews of the Qubo/Fiorino on Roadtestreports.co.uk or on Carbuyer.co.uk, or whether it be reviews of the identical Peugeot Bipper Tepee or Citroen Nemo Multispace or their van equivalents, I see negative after negative.
Okay, so people who don't have an axe to grind don't generally make a beeline for Owner Review websites in order to sound off, so in theory I could kid myself that all the moaners and groaners on those sites are an unrepresentative sample of Qubo owners, most of whom are happy and therefore silent. But what I do notice is that it's basically the same problems which are being mentioned again and again in the unfavourable reviews: judderings in high gears, electronics failing, wheel bearings developing problems, front tyres wearing out far too fast, electric windows conking out, warning lights being permanently displayed, door catches misbehaving, nasty smoke coming from the exhaust, fumes pouring from under the bonnet etc., etc., etc. Even the rear door hinges on the vans go rusty too early in their lives, it would appear.
Glancing at eBay and AutoTrader.co.uk, I also notice that there are a lot of Qubos/Fiorinos (and their Peugeot and Citroen equivalents) which appear to have had an unnatural number of owners, e.g. seven-year-old cars with five previous owners, which implies that after a year or so of ownership the owners simply admit defeat and give up the unwinnable struggle. Or an advertiser will say ‘recent new turbo’ or ‘thousands spent’, which at first glance reads like a recommendation but which can also be taken to mean that the car is simply a money pit on wheels. Fiat customer service at dealership level doesn't appear to be too great either, rendering the whole concept of a warranty something of a travesty. That's to say, if Fiat dealers can't figure out what's causing a problem with a Qubo, they simply shrug their shoulders and do nothing.
I find all this deeply worrying and have several times decided to forget all about Qubos, since my finances are tight and I can't afford to make a costly mistake. But every time a Qubo, Fiorino, Bipper or Nemo passes me on the road, I get this wistful feeling, not least because I know I'd feel so unbelievably comfortable behind the wheel. (Years ago, when I was hoping to learn to drive, I approached 25 driving schools before I found one with a car I could actually fit into, so you'll appreciate just what an amazing find the Qubo represents on that score.)
So, what would you advise? Are only a relative handful of Qubos absolute clunkers? Are most of them great and that's why you're all on this web forum, to agree how great they are? Or are Qubos sadly a good design wrecked by poor quality control in a factory in Turkey and therefore to be avoided at all costs? And would I be out of my mind to contemplate a 600-mile round trip in one? Is it only safe to use them as run-arounds close to home?
In a nutshell, is owning a Qubo like supporting Notts County - something which only a romantic idiot would do, because the reality is that there's actually no positive, rewarding aspect to it at all, just never-ending frustration and misery?
Thanks for your thoughts.
Last edited: