| |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #16 | ||
| Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Guildford
Posts: 406 Thanks: 23 Trader Rating: 1 | Re: Panda 100HP, turbo or not to turbo? Being old helps - £210 fully comp as stock, £310 with Rotrex and full mods declared. Could have been a lot worse by the sounds of things...
__________________
| ||
| | Quote
|
| | #17 |
| Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Southampton
Posts: 189 Thanks: 0 Trader Rating: 0 | Re: Panda 100HP, turbo or not to turbo? Haha, haven't been on here for ages, funny seeing this thread as the three members cars that are turbo or charged I have been involved with in some way lol. Alfa115spider Good to hear my old panda is still going strong, Jusdel30 glad you've got yours complete now ![]() Ringa glad yours is all sorted ecu wise -Andy
__________________ Clio RS200 271bhp 330lb/ft!!! /// Seicento 1.2 8v turbo 197bhp!! Panda 1.4 16v turbo 160bhp /// Honda Civic B16 Turbo 236bhp /// Punto Mk2 1.2 8v turbo 135bhp /// Punto MK2 1.2 8v NA 98bhp Last edited by shakey_hand_man; 13-04-2012 at 08:15. |
| | Quote
|
| | #18 | ||
| Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Guildford
Posts: 406 Thanks: 23 Trader Rating: 1 | Re: Panda 100HP, turbo or not to turbo? Andy - good to see you back. A risk of going off topic (well it is an old thread anyway) - what the hell have you done to that Clio to make power like that? More turbo's? Top result whatever you've done....
__________________
| ||
| | Quote
|
| | #19 |
| Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Southampton
Posts: 189 Thanks: 0 Trader Rating: 0 | Re: Panda 100HP, turbo or not to turbo?
__________________ Clio RS200 271bhp 330lb/ft!!! /// Seicento 1.2 8v turbo 197bhp!! Panda 1.4 16v turbo 160bhp /// Honda Civic B16 Turbo 236bhp /// Punto Mk2 1.2 8v turbo 135bhp /// Punto MK2 1.2 8v NA 98bhp |
| | Quote
|
| | #20 | ||
| Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 153 Thanks: 4 Trader Rating: 0 | Re: Panda 100HP, turbo or not to turbo? cheers andy-thanks for all your help m8-it was invaluable in putting it all together. cars kicking out 150bhp and goes like stink-havent met anything on the road i cant suprise yet! need new tires though-groan thats 400 quid shell out for the summer. motors-might as well just burn the cash instead its quicker!!
__________________
| ||
| | Quote
|
| | #21 |
| Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 267 Thanks: 5 Trader Rating: 0 | Re: Panda 100HP, turbo or not to turbo?
__________________ There are pretenders among us..... Geniuses with the ability to become anyone they want to be. |
| | Quote
|
| | #22 | ||
| Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: North Hampshire
Posts: 458 Thanks: 5 Trader Rating: 0 | Re: Panda 100HP, turbo or not to turbo?
__________________
| ||
| | Quote
|
| | #23 |
| Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Southampton
Posts: 189 Thanks: 0 Trader Rating: 0 | Re: Panda 100HP, turbo or not to turbo? This was my setup: http://youtu.be/V1teEMeYWMA http://youtu.be/gG5W_U31ZrY http://youtu.be/u36ZP8MDo1g -Andy
__________________ Clio RS200 271bhp 330lb/ft!!! /// Seicento 1.2 8v turbo 197bhp!! Panda 1.4 16v turbo 160bhp /// Honda Civic B16 Turbo 236bhp /// Punto Mk2 1.2 8v turbo 135bhp /// Punto MK2 1.2 8v NA 98bhp |
| | Quote
|
| | #24 | ||
| | Re: Panda 100HP, turbo or not to turbo? Sorry, just got distracted by your sig. 197hp out of a Punto 60 engine?!
__________________
| ||
| | Quote
|
| | #25 |
| Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Southampton
Posts: 189 Thanks: 0 Trader Rating: 0 | Re: Panda 100HP, turbo or not to turbo? Well a 06 panda engine, with a lot of work, I built the engine for a guy in Denmarks car
__________________ Clio RS200 271bhp 330lb/ft!!! /// Seicento 1.2 8v turbo 197bhp!! Panda 1.4 16v turbo 160bhp /// Honda Civic B16 Turbo 236bhp /// Punto Mk2 1.2 8v turbo 135bhp /// Punto MK2 1.2 8v NA 98bhp Last edited by shakey_hand_man; 25-05-2012 at 19:58. |
| | Quote
|
| | #26 | ||
| Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 369 Thanks: 7 Trader Rating: 0 | Re: Panda 100HP, turbo or not to turbo? Personally I wouldnt bother and just buy a faster car. Its not only the expense you have to think about but the reliability issues too. Everything has to be uprated to cope like clutches and drive shafts and all the bushes and bolts inbetween. Far easier and less hassle to buy something thats been designed for the power from the ground up. If you want to beat your friend with the Abarth 500 then buy an Abarth 500. Remember you will be spending a lot of money just to get to his level. If you do get there he will laugh in your face as he can spend that amount of money to tune his Abarth and get to a level you cant reach.
__________________
| ||
| | Quote
|
| | #27 |
| Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Southampton
Posts: 189 Thanks: 0 Trader Rating: 0 | Re: Panda 100HP, turbo or not to turbo? The above is understandable, but The cost of a abarth 500 vs the cost of a 100hp and turbo arrangement would be pretty similar, if not the panda being cheaper, unique and just as reliable if completed correctly. My example that makes people laugh was with my clio it cost 16k I spent about 3k tuning it, and had a race with a F430 soft top, the owner couldn't believe how quick the clio was and didn't understand why his car wasn't quicker. Tuning all comes down to how effectively you spend your money. -Andy
__________________ Clio RS200 271bhp 330lb/ft!!! /// Seicento 1.2 8v turbo 197bhp!! Panda 1.4 16v turbo 160bhp /// Honda Civic B16 Turbo 236bhp /// Punto Mk2 1.2 8v turbo 135bhp /// Punto MK2 1.2 8v NA 98bhp |
| | Quote
|
| | #28 |
| Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3,627 Thanks: 226 Trader Rating: 0 | Re: Panda 100HP, turbo or not to turbo? The above is understandable, but The cost of a abarth 500 vs the cost of a 100hp and turbo arrangement would be pretty similar, if not the panda being cheaper, unique and just as reliable if completed correctly.
__________________ Still a 500 enthusiast. |
| | Quote
|
| | #29 |
| Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Southampton
Posts: 189 Thanks: 0 Trader Rating: 0 | Re: Panda 100HP, turbo or not to turbo? Well at low boost my car was running over 190Nm between 2300 and 5000rpm (peak of 196Nm) and the car covered 12k miles with standard clutch (with no slip). -Andy
__________________ Clio RS200 271bhp 330lb/ft!!! /// Seicento 1.2 8v turbo 197bhp!! Panda 1.4 16v turbo 160bhp /// Honda Civic B16 Turbo 236bhp /// Punto Mk2 1.2 8v turbo 135bhp /// Punto MK2 1.2 8v NA 98bhp |
| | Quote
|
| | #30 | ||
| | Re: Panda 100HP, turbo or not to turbo? A common tactic with turbo centos (1108/1242cc) was to use a stilo 1.4 clutch and flywheel, possibly the same bits as standard on a 100hp?
__________________
| ||
| | Quote
|
| |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Panda Current car -Panda 100HP turbo | shakey_hand_man | Members Motors | 68 | 07-02-2012 00:56 |
| | euro panda | Panda | 13 | 04-02-2011 22:07 |
| | PandaFreakTurbo | Panda | 27 | 11-06-2010 07:19 |
| | Henne100HP | Panda | 14 | 10-03-2009 07:50 |