I'm doing not much better then 40-41 MPG.
Yes - but haven't you tuned yours? Or is it still the standard 85?I'm doing not much better then 40-41 MPG.
Yes - but haven't you tuned yours? Or is it still the standard 85?
'expert' reviews...nippy and powerful when needed, however, the mpg in real life is only about 35 if you're lucky.
In my experience you can make fairly rapid progress without wringing the neck of the thing. I can't imagine thrashing it to the point where I can get below 40mpg - I would imagine that's a lot of noise and not necessarily the best use of the power and torque bands. I don't hang about and the worst I've seen is 45mpg - during its first 1000 miles. Since then the mileage has improved.In my experience, 'Nippy' needs qualification. Once the turbo kicks in it will keep going and pull pretty well but to get it going from a standstill you need to wring its neck a bit. Make sure you try a steep hill from a standing start. If you're okay with leisurely it will do fine. And yes, the mileage is shocking for such a tiny engine. At least you'll be getting a low tax band if you're buying used.
In my experience, 'Nippy' needs qualification. Once the turbo kicks in it will keep going and pull pretty well but to get it going from a standstill you need to wring its neck a bit. Make sure you try a steep hill from a standing start. If you're okay with leisurely it will do fine. And yes, the mileage is shocking for such a tiny engine. At least you'll be getting a low tax band if you're buying used.
May I Ask where youve had this experience.?
I have a Cross which I bought new nine months ago. The gearing is likely different from the Easy, so that will also be a factor.
Part of the problem here is we're not all comparing the same cars. The AWD models have different gearing, are heavier and the transmission must also make a difference too. So comparing 2WD and AWD is like comparing apples and pears. Even the Cross and the Panda 4x4 are different.My experience may well be different from that of other TA owners, but my Cross has now done 23k miles, and I haven't detected any performance gains since new. The fuel economy is also unchanged - it continues to average 41mpg, as it did from day 1.
Any opinions and advice?
Part of the problem here is we're not all comparing the same cars. The AWD models have different gearing, are heavier and the transmission must also make a difference too. So comparing 2WD and AWD is like comparing apples and pears. Even the Cross and the Panda 4x4 are different.
Yes. I take your point - you were talking about economy gains and I was remarking on how the economy seems to vary wildly between owners. The other aspect I failed to mention was terrain - which is likely to be the biggest contributor.Granted, but my point is still valid. I haven't noticed any improved performance or fuel consumption as the miles have piled on. No comparison with a 2WD or 'ordinary' 4x4 involved in that observation.
Do not buy this car, however much discount they offer. There will always be that nagging doubt at the back of your mind about just how seriously it was damaged.