buying a camera, help

ok im buying a digital camera

currently I use an olympus OM10 and OM lenses for my really good photography, and im not looking to go digital SLR just yet as i will keep using this set up.

For more normal stuff and ease of use stuff, i have no camera at the moment, and recently went to a wedding where i used my old mans Fuji camera for doing some pictures for the bride and groom (in my style, not posed pictures) and found it an alright piece of kit, so been looking around and found the following cameras im interested in, but i know next to naff all about digital photography/camera technology, but im after something i can bung in auto or play with manually (like the fuji i used)

looked at

this fuji

this other fuji
and this wild card

the fujis are good for the money, take AA batteries which is great so when it runs out i dont have to bother charging them, but the panasonic one impressed me with its lens quality on far away and close up work, but it uses a battery pack.

please help!

how much do u want to spend?

you can pickup something like a d40 / 350d (400d with rebeat?) for not a lot and with the kit lens (more toward the d40) will be as (if not more) capable than a bridge camera.

if you want a bridge though, canon powershot g9 is good bit of kit.

the fujis as well are good, i dont know about the models you've posted but know the 9600fd was a nifty bit of kit.

Mmm, depends what you want it for really

If you are truly happy with keeping using the 35mm slr, then almost any of the smaller compacts are ok (personally I'd go for either a Canon, or possibly an Olympus mju for the weather protection - I have one of these at the moment)

However I suspect you'd quickly (well, within 6 months / a year) find yourself wanting a dslr (you'll become used to the convenience!), so you may as well buy one of those now and just accept it! In which case I'd also go for a D40 (and indeed did!)

It is nice to have both a compact and a (d)slr, as then you can either carry round a big thing if you're taking 'serious' images, and just a compact for all other times.

Good luck

pretty sure its going to be one of those fujis

what dya reckon?

I have just baught the Finepix s5800 and i cant fault it... so i can only assume the ones you have selected will be great but perhapse with more functions than you will ever use

not too worried about functions i wont use as i probably will

used to be into photography in a big way until about 10/12 years ago (used to do my own developing as well!)

I wont be getting rid of my film SLR stuff as they are just too good.

I last used them properly at my mates wedding in 2004 and their favourite photos were ones that i took, especially one, and as it was on film they blew it up and it was still pin sharp and bang on. (to be honest its my best photo i have ever taken as it wasnt a posed photo and it captured everything that was happening at that moment) (i also dont take pictures of people in poses at weddings coz they look demented)

Problem with film is you can end up taking 100 photos and 30 maybe cack and its costs you money in film and developing.

I tried to use a digital camera at a track day but the bloody thing wasnt quick enough, yet my film photos were bang on and used by the team whos car was in the picture.

Going to get back into it as i need a hobby that doesnt involve me fixing cars or buying records

the fuji i have (5800) has a burst mode which whilst not 100% perfect enables you to take several photos (one every .6 or.8 of a second IIRC)

this was taken on a fuji 5700



full post here

http://www.detailingworld.co.uk/foru...ighlight=donny


a few of my shots...






not bad to say its on the neighbours house roof

the last ones a bit dodgy, the rose is quite good but the bikes a bit grainey.

I think my problem lies in that im looking for something to replace my OM stuff (which i will still use) but on reflection its just an inbetween and a lazy camera for me.

Think im going with the s8000fd but its reviews are varied and two professional camera shops have said its better value for money and a better CCD than the panasonic one

oh im stuck now

buy a DSLR then. they're not as slow as other digital cameras, shutter lag is minimal and you can just shot in continous mode if you want to make sure you get a shot.

i think you'd only be disapointed with a bridge camera if you keep comparing it to film.

them pics, the last one is dodgy because of chromatic aberation (light of different colours / wavelenghts focusing at different points) and is a weakness of the lens.

Not to mention it was free hand, using the digital zoom, with anti hand shake mode.....

when you look at it like that i dont think it did too bad

tip though. don't use the digital zoom. it is the same as just cropping the image in photoshop and blowing it to massive size. you may as well use photoshop for that, as it'll do a better job than the camera will.

got the s8000fd delivered today, i have had a play and im realy impressed with the macro shots i did and a few other playing around shots.

After speaking to my dad (who is a former pro photographer) i have to use new techniques to get certain pictures. using the example above- track stuff- instead of using my film slr techniques i need to use, as suggested, the multishot feature, as its not like i'll run out of film/waste film, and this can get away from problems like this.

Im going to have a practice at our local track

The Fuji's are really good...I started out with the S5000 when I first got going and that lasted me for years producing shots that I used in brochures and everything! Great camera's Although DSLR quality can't be matched by them really...

well, im still impressed by it.

My mates in the pub have tried to ruin me saying i should have bought nikkon, which i think are crap

Nikon are far from crap...I upgraded my fuji to the D70s after a few years when i decided to make a serious go of it...but there's certainly nothing wrong with Fuji's!